Skip to main content

Dave Scherer Goes Insane, Threatens To Sue Me

Now, to be clear here, I'm not publishing e-mails from Mr. Scherer, because he has made it clear that any e-mails sent from him do not have permission to be published on this site under threat of legal action.  Even though it's been clearly established that people who e-mail me can reasonably have the expectation of having their e-mails published.  But just to summarize today's events without publication involved:

- Dave e-mails me with threats of legal action if Brian publishes e-mails from him.

- I tell Dave to blow it out his ass and leave me out of it.  That's a quote, by the way.

- Dave responds with more legal threats, plus some unwarranted personal attacks against me and Brian.  Apparently I've always been a freak.  

Given I haven't even spoken to Dave since 1995 I don't even know what his issue is anymore (and he hasn't produced any evidence of what was "stolen" in the first place) I can only presume he's gone off the deep end.  So go subscribe to his site, everyone!  

Comments

  1. Apparently, his witty name for me is "Dork Loser."


    He is far too narcissistic to realize how bad he is coming off right now.

    ReplyDelete
  2. And the reason for the threat of lawsuit with the emails is because he will look AWFUL if they were released

    ReplyDelete
  3. If you could sue over Scott publishing e-mails, than Caliber should get his lawyer on the phone

    ReplyDelete
  4. "That'll put some butts in the seats"

    ReplyDelete
  5. Of course the guy has gone off the deep end. Look at his Twitter avatar, for God's sake. He makes the Unabomber look like Pope Francis.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Again, if he emails you, he gives up protection. He has zero legal recourse.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Maybe common sense says you shouldn't have told him you were going to release them.

    ReplyDelete
  8. He is a lunatic and a bully to people who are not intimidated by him.


    Just giving it right back to him

    ReplyDelete
  9. But it sounds so close to Brock Lesnar, so that's a plus.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I'd like to see Caliber get into the mix on this one

    ReplyDelete
  11. I'd say release them, I'd make for a funny episode of Judge Judy.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I want to See Caliber in a twitter war with Scherer, I'd be pulling for Caliber.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Forget WWE.
    Forget TNA.
    Hell, forget NXT.


    THIS is where the real action is these days. This shit is gold.

    ReplyDelete
  14. The popcorn is ready.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I demand I call you that after I finally get my coffee.


    (In reality, I'm actually drinking one right now for the first time in two years because it was free, I'm so going to regret this later tonight)

    ReplyDelete
  16. You got that right.
    Here is the list
    1. Farva's death
    2. Scherer feud
    3. Caliber blowout.

    ReplyDelete
  17. This whole thing is real, huh? Shakes me head.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Also, it's hilarious that Scott suggests subscribing to Dave's site after all this. The last thing I'm gonna do is support this insane asshole.

    ReplyDelete
  19. I'm so excited.....

    ReplyDelete
  20. Magoonie NOT Teddy BelmontJune 25, 2014 at 5:59 PM

    Anybody know why Dave Scherer seems to have some sort of disdain for Scott? I don't think I even remember Scott saying anything bad about the guy.

    ReplyDelete
  21. I still don't understand how this is any different than PWInsider and other sites posting literally ALL of the Wrestling Observer.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Just having checked with my (almost) lawyer girlfriend, and she confirmed - There's no cause of action Dave may have and no expectation of privacy in an email between two individuals (no attorney-client, doctor-patient or any other privilege exists). So All of Dave's threats of legal action? All bark, absolutely no bite.


    He can threaten legal action all he wants, but any judge would laugh him and his creepy ass dog out of the courtroom.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Don't forget Meekin's botched blowout.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Sarcasm. Scott is good at it.

    ReplyDelete
  25. It's more of a sad dog really.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Scott, let me know if you want me to tell Scherer to: "Go away."

    ReplyDelete
  27. 4. Meekin's botched blowout.

    ReplyDelete
  28. I seem to recall Scott saying it dates back to Scott's general distaste or even hatred for ECW. And Big Dave basically hating Scott since then because of that.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Yeah, all Scherer.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Whatever. He's fucking creepy, then.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Just read his Twitter timeline...the guy doesn't seem all there to me. Take all of this silly nonsense with a grain of salt.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Scott he has zero ground to stand on for any kind of legal threat. The BoD update is easily covered by fair use and the email thing is a joke. You have no expectation of privacy in sending out a crazy ass rant to someone by email. Even still I can see why you would want to avoid a pissing contest with some lunatic.

    If anyone who hasn't seen the emails wants to read them just say so and give you address and I'll forward them to you unless someone else beats me to it.

    ReplyDelete
  33. I feel like it may be his stock in trade.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Aric Johnson (copyright 2014)June 25, 2014 at 6:01 PM

    Fuck, I love Scott.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Aric Johnson (copyright 2014)June 25, 2014 at 6:02 PM

    no homo

    ReplyDelete
  36. rec.sport.pro-wrestling explodes!

    Hear all the dirt they DON'T want you to know at alt.fan.don.no-soul.simmons!

    ReplyDelete
  37. Scherer's pants are in a knot because there's not enough advertising on this website. You can't possibly spread sheet news without having people pay 10 dollars a month to avoid ads.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Scherer was one of the "mutants", Scott loved tweaking them endlessly.

    ReplyDelete
  39. OOOH! steven.ferrari@gmail.com

    ReplyDelete
  40. Aric Johnson (copyright 2014)June 25, 2014 at 6:03 PM

    The difference is that Dave Meltzer is sane.

    ReplyDelete
  41. I'm going to send you an email to ask about forwarding them.

    ReplyDelete
  42. nick_piers@hotmail.com


    I must see this!

    ReplyDelete
  43. I always liked you, regardless of what anyone else here says about you.

    ReplyDelete
  44. "Break his leg, Sheik"

    ReplyDelete
  45. Report: Former WWE Name Released Today Backstage at TNA NYC Taping

    ReplyDelete
  46. Maybe he wants you to be a freak...

    ...in bed.

    ReplyDelete
  47. "Break his dog, WCW1987."


    Feels more... (in)appropriate.

    ReplyDelete
  48. It all goes back to post 18316 on rec.sport.pro-wrestling in 1994.


    A day that will live in infamy.

    ReplyDelete
  49. According to his Twitter, Bayless has been publishing news from his site without consent. That is illegal and he would have grounds to sue. The email thing is different.

    It is like if I reprinted news from behind the Wall Street Journal paywall on my site without paying them for it. It is copyrighted information and they could sue me.

    ReplyDelete
  50. I thought that was a shoot blowout?

    ReplyDelete
  51. He is only threatening to sue for the emails

    ReplyDelete
  52. Ask and he shall recieve

    ReplyDelete
  53. Except Scherer is taking that news first from Meltzer.

    ReplyDelete
  54. The consent thing got Bayless banned from the Elite account, as per the terms of service. There's nothing else he can do.

    ReplyDelete
  55. That's not really what Bayless is doing. He is saying what his site reported, but giving him full credit

    ReplyDelete
  56. I figured I got Caliber to leave with the two magic words, maybe it'll work a second time? He's a grown adult acting like he bought a pack of Pokemon cards and Brian took an energy card from it.

    ReplyDelete
  57. Aric Johnson (copyright 2014)June 25, 2014 at 6:06 PM

    No, you cannot own facts, or rumours presented as fact, only your own description of them.

    ReplyDelete
  58. Oh. That makes no sense at all then.

    ReplyDelete
  59. Its because Meltzer watches everything and does not have the time to send empty legal threats via email

    ReplyDelete
  60. It was a shoot made to look like a botched shoot. Except that shoot was botched, so it turned more into a shoot.

    ReplyDelete
  61. Sure! Kylelitke@gmail.com

    ReplyDelete
  62. Aric Johnson (copyright 2014)June 25, 2014 at 6:08 PM

    That too.

    ReplyDelete
  63. Well, it makes sense since he's crazy.

    ReplyDelete
  64. Shoot him over, jobber... justinr@placetobenation.com


    Thanks!

    ReplyDelete
  65. jeremy.woodard1@gmail.com if you weeeeel

    ReplyDelete
  66. Completely incorrect. What Bayless did is 100% covered under fair use

    ReplyDelete
  67. You can't copyright news.


    I may keep people from directly quoting my saying that "The sun blazed down on the scorched earth as the thermometer hit 92 degrees today!", but I can't stop people from saying "Zanatude said it was sunny and 92."

    ReplyDelete
  68. Scherer was, is and always will be a hack.

    ReplyDelete
  69. That poor poor dog.....

    ReplyDelete
  70. briankc1981@yahoo.com

    ReplyDelete
  71. You got the email?

    ReplyDelete
  72. Yeah, dude. Chill. I was reading.

    ReplyDelete
  73. I'M AFRAID I'VE GOT SOME BAD NEWS.

    ReplyDelete
  74. It's like the "Don't forget your scissors" of BoD shoots

    ReplyDelete
  75. kjacobson56@yahoo.com

    ReplyDelete
  76. An email exchange between you and someone else is legally YOUR property. You are free to do with them what you want - just as with regular mail. There is no expectation of privacy once something is placed in print and mailed off to someone else, and the same rule applies to email exchanges.

    ReplyDelete
  77. Magoonie NOT Teddy BelmontJune 25, 2014 at 6:12 PM

    Dave Scherer: "If ANYBODY is going to make money off of my rambling idiotic emails it's gonna be me"

    ReplyDelete
  78. Ok ok.
    :stops hovering:

    ReplyDelete
  79. I wonder if the emails are covered in spyware.......

    ReplyDelete
  80. Jgorny23@gmail.com

    ReplyDelete
  81. Sweet, thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  82. Aric Johnson (copyright 2014)June 25, 2014 at 6:14 PM

    And Brian. You guys rock.

    ReplyDelete
  83. Hopefully, Scherer goes after PTB, too. That should be tons of fun!

    ReplyDelete
  84. [citation needed]

    ReplyDelete
  85. Nah...I'm gonna experiment with taking the high road.

    ReplyDelete
  86. Uncrusimatic_Buck_NastyJune 25, 2014 at 6:16 PM

    scherer claims that scott's site is a "for profit" site since it has ads

    grasping at straws, or is that a legit statement?

    ReplyDelete
  87. Yeah he seems to forget that part.

    Let's go remind him on twitter.

    ReplyDelete
  88. Uncrusimatic_Buck_NastyJune 25, 2014 at 6:17 PM

    what if it's news about how the network is going to fail miserably?

    ReplyDelete
  89. Scott does make some money from the site, but it's petty cash at best, I imagine. He still has a full-time job.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment