Skip to main content

Another 1995 question

Hey Scott, you've mentioned before how much Diesel was tanking business and as soon as they put the belt on Bret, business picked up again and I want to know why that was. You've also mentioned before that once Bret won the title he was booked as a lameduck champion, but reading your 1995 Raw reviews, Bret was also being booked as a lameduck challenger too as the guy was still feuding and having problems with Jerry Lawler, a guy anybody can beat. Hell even Aldo Montoya pinned the King once. So yeah, my question is since the booking didn't improve, and since Bret's credibility seemed to be pretty low at this point, why did business pick up?

​Because people liked and cared about Bret Hart, and not about Diesel.  ​

Comments

  1. There is some truth to that, but at the same time WCW showed they can destroy anyone's marketability as Bret stopped being a draw towards the end of his run there and it's not like Bret was booked any better in 95 than compared to his WCW run as Bret was essentially booked as a midcarder.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Diesel was the lowest drawing WWF champion in history. Bret wasn't. Not sure what more you need here.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Looks like somebody needs to take another look at Nash's chart display.

    ReplyDelete
  4. But don't blame Big Kev for that, Scott. All he does is complain about the guys they put him up against. Bret at Rumble, HBK and Mania, feud with Sid, Mabel at SummerSlam. I imagine Nash thought he could draw if he was against tomato cans like Jarrett for a year.

    ReplyDelete
  5. WWF was leaking on Diesel power, and it needed filled up.


    This was remedied by filling it up with someone's tears that just watched a Bret match, and the WWF ran again!


    THAAAAANK YOUUUUUU, BRETTTTTTT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  6. By the end of his WCW run the company was running on fumes and everyone knew it was a matter of time before they went under. They were dead by mid 99

    ReplyDelete
  7. Diesel also started only slapping hands with people if it had a black glove on it. That could've been what turned business around

    ReplyDelete
  8. Sniff...go get'em, champ...

    ReplyDelete
  9. They also turned hall and nash into huge draws.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Take it easy. No ones doubting the awesomeness of your fellow canadian

    ReplyDelete
  11. The general sentiment around here is usually that neither Diesel nor Michaels drew as champ. Nash lost the belt to Bret in November, Shawn won it at Mania. Are we saying that Brets 6 month reign really boosted business in a notable way? I dont know the #s, so I really am asking, not antagonizing

    ReplyDelete
  12. That's the weird thing, even Shawn had more world title credibility than Bret during this time, but even Bret did better business than him regardless.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I'm not sure where this revisionist history that says when Bret had the belt they were raking in money hand over fist came from. Do you use Canadian dollars when Bret had the belt?

    ReplyDelete
  14. ....Just like Bret does not doubt El Dandy.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I don't know if anyone's making that claim, just that he drew more than Nash. Which is a fair claim, since you and I drew almost as much as Nash.

    And Bret was a legit draw internationally.

    ReplyDelete
  16. The idea is that Diesel was the lowest drawing champion. The question then becomes, how much higher up was Bret on that list? Probably not that much higher.

    ReplyDelete
  17. I know you're never serious but to answer the question for others who may be, you can look at history of wwe and look at the attendance numbers in September and October 1995 and compare them to December 95 and into January and February 96 and there is a bump in attendance. For example, they drew 8,000 paid with Diesel on top in the garden but in January drew 10,000 paid with Bret. There are also a good amount more sell outs once Bret takes over. It's not like they doubled their attendance and he still had some low drawing shows, but Bret did draw about 1,000 more fans on average from what I looked at, sometimes more. Just my observation, I checked the site because I was curious.

    ReplyDelete
  18. I've heard the legit draw internationally thing, but it ignores the fact that international shows may draw better, but the profit is actually lower because the overhead is so much higher.

    ReplyDelete
  19. I just checked the numbers comparing Diesel to Bret in house show attendance and Bret did draw more from what I can see. I used the history of wwe site.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Was who was the champ the only difference in the cards?

    ReplyDelete
  21. Part of that had to be their gimmick. Bret was always this earnest "take on all comers" type of guy, and Shawn was a whiny douche. Which one had a broader appeal? Not saying anything about how they are/were in real life, but I could never stand shawn at all, and loved Bret. Oh yeah and fuck Kevin Nash. . .

    ReplyDelete
  22. True. But (and I have no numbers to back this up, this is just what guys who were working then have always said) they say they were going on European tours so frequently in those days because it was the only place they were making any money.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Couple of things about that. First, eventually you're going to get to the law of diminishing returns. If not, why not just become a European wrestling company? Second, it's Europe. American entertainment always draws over there. Because it's rare and seems big time. Third, how much less did hbk and Nash draw when they were champ on those tours?

    ReplyDelete
  24. Never said they were "raking money hand over fist", I said he was drawing better than Diesel, the lowest drawing champion in history.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Not much at all. The Nash-Bret-Shawn sequence was really putrid as far as business went.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Well, as far as the diminishing returns go, business picked back up before they had to cross that bridge. For all we know they may well have done more and more in Europe if it ended up being one of the only things keeping them afloat.

    ReplyDelete
  27. "Second, it's Europe. American entertainment always draws over there."

    sorry, but that's a generalization that's simple not true. if business in every European country would always be the same there wouldn't have been just four dates in Germany this year (compared to thirty (!) in 1994).

    ReplyDelete
  28. also both Michaels and Diesel had basically taken everything away that got them over in the first place: Diesel was a bad ass with a grim look on his face who beat people up, Michaels was a self centered arrogant prick who was able to backup everything he said in the ring.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Bret was booked a lot worse in WCW than in 1995's WWF.

    ReplyDelete
  30. On Michaels, Bret himself has said Shawn gets a raw deal over "not drawing," that it didn't matter who was champ in '96, WCW would still have taken the lead with the NWO being so hot.

    ReplyDelete
  31. I still love that Nash claimed that Bret wanted to be champ so badly that he told Vince he would take a cut in pay, which then cut everyone else's pay since no one could make more than the champ.


    Fucking Nash.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Exactly. It also didn't help that Nash looked like shit in any match that didn't hae him against Bret or shawn. . .

    ReplyDelete
  33. To be fair, ring work means nothing. Hogan has gone out and done the same bare minimum matches for years on top, but he connected with fans. Nash/Diesel sucked as a character once he won the WWF Title.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Bret couldn't walk down the street in Europe without women throwing their panties at him and men breaking into tears.

    ReplyDelete
  35. I don't know if he'd take a pay it specifically to be WWF Champion (though if anyone would), but maybe he agreed to a pay cut in exchange for being used better than he had been. It's not that far fetched that a guy would settle for a certain amount in return for a better push.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment