Skip to main content

Daniel Bryan questions

Hello: Three parts
 
1. Do you think people are being overly pessimistic as to how the Bryan push will go? He pinned Cena clean in the middle of the ring in the main event for Summerslam. Surely that's enough to persuade anyone that he is being pushed to the moon?
2. Do you think this in part shows that their 50/50 booking, Wins/losses approach has it's merits? Bryan had the talent and charisma to get over despite losing loads. Same ( to a lesser extent) as Ziggler. Maybe that approach has merits, in that only the cream will rise to the top?
3. Is the underdog Bryan having great matches on top of the card not enough to persuade you to watch/review Raw more often?

1.  I don't know who these people are, but I think we've established now that Bryan is a top guy for good.

2.  No.

3.  No.  I'll be doing the 90 minute show on Hulu tonight, though.

Comments

  1. #2 has probably ruined zigglers career. Bryan did tons of jobs with the briefcase but he got an actual run with the WHC and was pushed hard post 18 seconds with a great match against sheamus, the punk program and the Kane angle. Ziggler hasn't done shit but lose and get a divas angle.

    ReplyDelete
  2. TBF, ziggler is just putrid as a face. Why am I supposed to cheer this guy?

    ReplyDelete
  3. "Do you think this in part shows that their 50/50 booking, Wins/losses approach has it's merits? Bryan had the talent and charisma to get over despite losing loads. Same ( to a lesser extent) as Ziggler. Maybe that approach has merits, in that only the cream will rise to the top?"

    "No."

    Not that I'm looking to debate this point but what's your rationale behind the answer? I am genuinely curious.

    ReplyDelete
  4. "Please keep doing RAWs, even though you were really clear that you're not going to"

    ReplyDelete
  5. It makes everyone look like a loser and creates a roster with no hierarchy

    ReplyDelete
  6. Correction.


    It puts Cena (who rarely loses against the rest of the roster and only against special attractions) above everyone.


    I still think Bryan isn't a top guy until he cuts that goofy fucking beard.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Yeah I thought we were long past worrying about Daniel Bryan's push, especially after Summerslam

    ReplyDelete
  8. Funny how now that Cena's gone 50/50 booking was immediately abolished - Rhodes beat Sandow twice in a row

    ReplyDelete
  9. Small sample size.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Stranger in the AlpsAugust 20, 2013 at 10:25 AM

    Sagging ratings have probably contributed to the brass finally seeing the light as to freshening things up. They were all like "check out the reactions of this Daniel Bryan guy". They didn't have to build him up much further, because the mechanics were already in place...excellent worker, solid crowd support. Now, of course, with Cena out for a time, if ratings continue to sag, they will attribute it as not so much as Daniel Bryan at the top, but more as lack of Cena on TV, further justifying slotting Cena right back in central focus mode. DB is a good start, but more needs to be done. A possible strong heel stable is but one part.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I'm coming in on the side of cutting off the beard as well.

    ReplyDelete
  12. For #2, I'd argue that these guys got over in spite of the 50/50 booking.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Stranger in the AlpsAugust 20, 2013 at 10:34 AM

    I think Ziggler is being miscast, for lack of a better term. He just has natural heel instincts, and is not trying to do much to get himself over as a babyface. On the basis of actual ring work, there are much better match ups for him on the heel side, especially with Bryan and Punk on the face side. I would not be surprised to see Ziggler go back to heel in a few months, re-establish his solid work against a capable face, and shoot back up the card.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Ziggler said in an interview last week he doesn't plan on changing anything about his act to be more of a face. It is kind of refreshing in some ways.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Charismatic e-Negro Jef VinsonAugust 20, 2013 at 10:36 AM

    I'd think injuries were more of a contributing factor.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Cena is the perfect wrestler in the sense that he can do very high profile jobs and maintain his wacky tobacky heat.


    Punk beat him
    Bryan beat him


    Now whereas Punk had the leverage of re-signing and demanding more of a presence in the card, Bryan does not. I will go on the stance that Vince isn't behind him 100% and is only using him because of the Bellas and the diva show at this point.


    Yes he has been pushed hard since the Sheamus loss, but his title win only serves to give the new Orton/HHH regime some GREAT matches and solidfy the Orton turn.




    I dont see Bryan getting the title back anytime soon and I see Cena coming back like a knight in shining armor after Bryan has been dismissed during the fall.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Charismatic e-Negro Jef VinsonAugust 20, 2013 at 10:38 AM

    I'm surprised the WWE hasn't marketed this gem:

    http://www.vat19.com/dvds/beardo-original-beard-hat.cfm?adid=gbase&gclid=CNaZ7d26jLkCFZFFMgodDBIAVw

    ReplyDelete
  18. I like his offense as a face, but yeah, the character's falling flat for me.

    ReplyDelete
  19. And while that may work for Punk, Austin and others, it absolutely doesn't work for him. His act screams douchebag heel, especially since he doesn't have a strong body of work in terms of story development to back himself up.


    They really need to move him back as a heel, maybe this time keep him away from a "so-and-so is my girlfriend" angle and just let him be a show off.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Bryan got over while losing a lot, yes. Bryan REALLY got over, as in biggest pops in the entire company, when WWE cut the bullshit and started having him beat everyone.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Your_Favourite_AssholeAugust 20, 2013 at 10:47 AM

    hi hhh/vince/stephanie!

    ReplyDelete
  22. I think I hate him more (in kayfabe) as a face than I did as a heel. There is absolutely nothing likable about this guy's character.

    ReplyDelete
  23. YankeesHoganTripleHFanAugust 20, 2013 at 10:53 AM

    You see Scott there's your problem right there. You say that you are going to step back a little bit and give some new guys a shot and here you are posting questions on the same day, the SAME DAY that the new guys posted their Raw reviews. Didn't you notice that MIKE MEARS WAS GETTING OVER!!! Why did you have to go and steal the spotlight from him and squash any chance he has at a push. I realize that he doesn't post Raw reviews in the so called "Scott Keith style" but that's reason to bury the guy. I mean his review is literally underneath your Daniel Bryan question now.

    ReplyDelete
  24. thread jack--


    Imagining poor Dougie continuously refreshing the blog praying that my ROH review would be up was simply to heartbreaking, so I felt the need to tell you all what's up. Since this weeks ROH was a collection of matches that would have been reviewed by Curry and Ryan before me I've decided to just tack my thoughts onto the beginning of next weeks rather then do a full recap. Instead this week I'm going to work on the review of "OLE-OLE the best of El Generico that was promised to the winner of the "what the fuck is Truth Martini's tattoo" contest winner. DVD review should go up this weekend

    ReplyDelete
  25. Mears is just going to have to learn Scott Keith style. It's the only way he's going to make it on this blog.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Yeah, this is what I mean by question 1:)

    I think Bryan will get a good 6 months plus chance as the top guy. Is that enough time to see if he is a success? If he isn't, shouldn't he be kept in the upper mid carf and soneone else give a go?

    ReplyDelete
  27. Maybe his upcoming matches with the shield will help?

    ReplyDelete
  28. Bryan will probably be the Mankind to Cena's Austin.

    ReplyDelete
  29. That's true, and an excellent point.

    ReplyDelete
  30. For me, the Litmus test is:

    Have Orton and Bryan Square off in a match, at The Mobile Civic Center, in Mobile, Alabama, filled exclusively with 10,000 local fans. If the crowd is 85% behind Bryan, and Orton gets booed, I'm convinced that everything has worked out perfectly.

    Right now, I can't quite shake the feeling that Bryan is over like MAD in the Blue states, and only somewhat over in the Red States.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Charismatic e-Negro Jef VinsonAugust 20, 2013 at 11:16 AM

    ...and we know how HHH treated Mankind.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Can I just finally come clean and say that even though he's a fantastic bumper/seller and underrated on the mic, Ziggler just doesn't have it? His offense is sloppy and often inconsistent, his character doesn't really change or ever show strong motivation, and even though he's been out there on TV every week for four or five years, it feels like you don't really know him or what makes him tick. Honestly I just think he's better suited to being a good hand than a top guy.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Do we really need another in depth discussion of why 50/50 booking doesn't work again?

    ReplyDelete
  34. Charismatic e-Negro Jef VinsonAugust 20, 2013 at 11:26 AM

    Never underestimate the power of a good finisher.
    Dolph's matches have no psychology other than bumping for someone else. In HBK's book I believe it was one of the bookers that warned him about that in matches. Anyway, When you have a good finisher you have something to build to. The Zig-Zag just doesn't do that.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Charismatic e-Negro Jef VinsonAugust 20, 2013 at 11:29 AM

    Does the BoD have a developmental territory to send him to?

    ReplyDelete
  36. there's meds for that.

    ReplyDelete
  37. It seemed like they were gonna give Ziggler the superkick (that's what he used to beat Cena at TLC '12), but then that went away. That move alone could have been a huge difference maker in getting him over.

    ReplyDelete
  38. I prefer the med-free option... BAN THE FUJ

    ReplyDelete
  39. Yes, it's called 411mania.

    ReplyDelete
  40. YankeesHoganTripleHFanAugust 20, 2013 at 11:37 AM

    Saskatoon, I believe

    ReplyDelete
  41. I'll indulge you. For what?

    ReplyDelete
  42. I think it's way too early to write the book on the guy yet (he's only just recently escaped the Kofi Kingston lower card hell), but yeah, he might not be "Punk/Bryan" megastar material. Doesn't mean he can't still be a second tier guy for a long time.


    If we're recasting modern WWE as the Attitude Era (which is what they obviously did last night), I think Ziggler comps out as 1998 Triple H. He's the smarmy midcard face who talks a lot of smack, ALMOST seems like a top star but not quite, and gets his nose in the big storylines in a way that the fans enjoy.


    Unfortunately for Dolph, he's gonna have to wait awhile before he can marry the bosses' daughter and get pushed to the moon.

    ReplyDelete
  43. I think they will now. The fanbase you're speaking of reacts pretty well to what happens on TV, and I don't see how your average non-internet fan could cheer for Orton over Bryan after last night.

    ReplyDelete
  44. Question #1: Scott, you should go through the Raw live thread, you'll find plenty of folks complaining that the heel actually got the upper hand last night and thinks it means Bryan is headed right back down the card after he jobs in 6 straight PPVs to Orton and HHH.

    ReplyDelete
  45. I think Dolph is a several time WHC, but at most a brief 1-time WWE champion when it's all said and done... I agree with Ry's points on him.

    ReplyDelete
  46. Just call this Q&A The Pedigree... no one kicks out of it, including older blog posts!


    As an aside, isn't it odd that the move was never re-named? Once HHH dropped the blue-blood gimmick for DX, you think they would've renamed the finisher.

    ReplyDelete
  47. Well, get ready for the annual 0.3 ratings drop in a few weeks once football starts... hopefully there's not panic once that occurs.

    ReplyDelete
  48. That's what I'm looking at.


    Orton (a Vince project)
    HHH (the son in law)


    together?


    Bryan is gonna make Orton look GREAT in matches in the same vein Christian made Orton look great during their little fied a couple years back.

    ReplyDelete
  49. In a lot of ways, the concussion/title-loss-face-turn really fucked things up for Ziggler. If Zigs had gotten a proper heel title reign, before say dropping the title to RVD in the fall, he totally would have been made. The douchebag act with AJ and Big E had shitloads of potential— never even got to tap how much heat the boyfriend/girlfriend double champions could have drawn.


    THAT SAID, I think last night is a great sign for him. A storyline like the Corporation is built to get babyfaces over if done correctly. Just by virtue of going out there and talking trash to HHH/Vince/Steph and having killer matches with the Shield, Ziggler can get over huge. It's HHH's DX role in 98, and Jericho's role in 2000.


    Not saying it's a sure thing, but I think there's way more potential for something to break here than there would be in Ziggler chasing Del Rio.

    ReplyDelete
  50. The beard is gonna go as part of this storyline, guaranteed.

    ReplyDelete
  51. Charismatic e-Negro Jef VinsonAugust 20, 2013 at 11:48 AM

    I still think the Rude Awakening would work. Something that comes out of nowhere can pretty much be used on anyone and can easily be sold by an opponent.

    ReplyDelete
  52. Charismatic e-Negro Jef VinsonAugust 20, 2013 at 11:49 AM

    I knew that was coming. I was just happy to be the setup man.

    ReplyDelete
  53. For depressing me with your pessimistic view of Bryan's future

    ReplyDelete
  54. So basically he ends up with Chris Jericho's career? Not everyone has to hit Austin/Rock levels to end up as a success.

    ReplyDelete
  55. World needs midcarders too ya knowwww...

    ReplyDelete
  56. I dunno man, it could be wishful thinking but I don't think Cena figures into the end-game of the Corporation stuff.


    My guess, and yeah it's a guess, is that Cena really does take a shitload of time off, comes back and enters himself in the Rumble. (There's your huge selling point for the Rumble— Cena's return.) He doesn't win the Rumble (I really think this is Punk's year), and therefore does what every megastar with nothing else to do/prove has to do: He challenges The Undertaker.


    Cena's coming back for The Streak, not the Corporation.

    ReplyDelete
  57. lol... I don't even know where to begin.


    How many can't miss project has the WWE "missed"


    They average about one a year.


    I believe Daniel Bryan is a pawn. He gets the good crowd reactions, so Orton has some heat going into subsequent matches with him.


    He provides the workrate, Orton gets the duke(s). Bryan maintains his heat.


    Cena comes back, Bryan goes back to being upper midcard.


    Cena/Orton(HHH) in the winter.

    ReplyDelete
  58. Sounds good, but I feel WM 30 is title vs streak.


    Orton/HHH has to implode sooner or later.


    (kayfabe) Orton is gonna be tired of being under HHH after a while.

    ReplyDelete
  59. Does WWE even run Mobile, Alabama? Huh.


    Anyway, Anaheim CA is far from a smark town. Hell, other than the Brooklyn show the night after MITB, have they even been running Raw from any smark or Northeast towns the last few months? I don't think so, and Bryan's been over like rover at every one of them.


    I think they're past the point of Bryan being a regional fad.

    ReplyDelete
  60. And I thank you for giving me the opportunity.

    ReplyDelete
  61. it's still impossible for me to take anyone named 'Dolph Ziggler´ seriously no matter how good he may be.

    ReplyDelete
  62. We'll just have to haze him, and possibly rape him, until he learns how we like things done around here.

    ReplyDelete
  63. Well that's a lot different because the WHC at the time was on a specific brand, where now it's basically like the IC title of the 80s & 90s. Plus, Jericho was WON wrestler of the year for two straight years, something I don't see Dolph pulling off.

    ReplyDelete
  64. I'm surprised he didn't come up with some penis inspired name during the DX days.

    ReplyDelete
  65. Am I crazy or are adults that call them selves hhh fans as bad as the people in the 70's that proudly voted for Nixon?

    ReplyDelete
  66. YankeesHoganTripleHFanAugust 20, 2013 at 12:57 PM

    He was not a crook!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  67. YankeesHoganTripleHFanAugust 20, 2013 at 12:58 PM

    The Johnson Drop perhaps?

    ReplyDelete
  68. I'm happy to have you point me to post or what I should google to look it up rather than repeating it. Honestly, although I've seen references here or there I don't think I've ever seen much of a full-blown discussion other than a comment thread here or there. I'm looking for why *you* said no, not the rest of the BoD.

    ReplyDelete
  69. Dude, no way. No efinn way do they have Cena lose clean at Summerslam (one of his what, 5 clean losses in the last 10 years?) just to job Bryan out to Orton.



    Maybe HHH poses some concern over how much ass he'll show to get Bryan over, but I really think Orton is a non-issue. He's a two-strike guy who everyone realizes has reached his ceiling as a draw. He's in this spot because he's the PERFECT guy for it (main event cred, blank slate as a character) and he's there to put the babyface over. I doubt management really gives two shits about Orton in this situation.


    And we all need to stop acting like Daniel Bryan has been set up to fail by WWE and they aren't behind him 100%. Christ, the guy has been pushed from Day 1 in a way that the other midcard folk heroes (Ziggler, Kofi, Swagger, etc etc) never were. He won the WHC a year and a half in, held it for 4 months, and then spent another 4 months in WWE title matches. And then spent the better part of a year getting shitloads of TV time and defending the tag titles.

    THEN he beats every top guy cleanly, including Cena only THREE years into the company.


    Bryan's trajectory isn't Eddie Guerrero or Chris Benoit or the other "vanilla midgets" that WWE reluctantly pushed half-heartedly. His trajectory is more like John Cena's.

    ReplyDelete
  70. You know, for all his faults, Nixon did some good things. He started the EPA, he started the clean air and water acts, he continued the NASA missions which put a man on the moon (Albeit for odd reasons), and though a lot of people blame Vietnam on him, there's plenty of blame to go around and a lot of it falls onto Johnson's shoulders. He also opened up trade and dialogue with China.

    ReplyDelete
  71. He should have changed it to The Glass Ceiling years ago.

    ReplyDelete
  72. As long as Daniel Bryan beats Orton (and HHH) down the line and gets his retribution along with the WWE title, then this storyline is a WIN.


    DB is the focus of the show right now and I don't see that changing any time soon, title or not this is a huge sign he is already a top guy.

    ReplyDelete
  73. He also wanted universal healthcare and started the DEA he would likely be a Democrat today... and if he was a Republican the Teabaggers would have nothing to do with him (which is about as big of a political compliment as I can give) and try to primary him.

    ReplyDelete
  74. That's the exact problem with Miz, too.

    ReplyDelete
  75. For arguments sake, how many can't miss projects in the last, let's say five years, would you say:
    1) WWE failed on. Like, completely fucked up. (So for instance, I don't think "Brock Lesnar" qualifies because honestly, the 3-matches per year deal kinda handicaps what they could really get from him besides what they've already gotten)

    2) The projects were at the level that Daniel Bryan currently is at.


    #2 is the tricky one. That means you can't say "Nexus" because gimme a break, something like Nexus couldn't sniff the ass of what Bryan has gotten in terms of reactions, match quality, and potential to make money. Same goes for "Kofi at the Garden" or similar midcarders who got the rug pulled from them too soon.


    I'm not saying WWE doesn't fuck things up— far from it. But Vince is usually pretty good about going all the way when he has a chance to make a fan-friendly superface, and that's what Bryan is right now. I think Vince goes all the way with him.

    ReplyDelete
  76. This guy.... uhm, comments on it in a manner I agree with.

    ReplyDelete
  77. And just to extend the analogy, for all his faults HHH has had some damn good matches.

    ReplyDelete
  78. Yep. Hindsight villifies him, but the stuff he is remembered for is commonplace in the last several presidents

    ReplyDelete
  79. Bryan is a top guy now for sure, but I fear he will become more "Mick Foley" than "Steve Austin" in all of this. Bryan as the underdog getting the belt, while we build more toward Cena's big return. But I see no reason not to enjoy it for now.

    ReplyDelete
  80. WWE has an interesting luxury right now, in that even with Cena out, they still have two red-hot babyface acts going. It's almost as if they could push two guys to World titles and have it culminate in one big match in early April. (If only that other title meant anything)

    ReplyDelete
  81. Hell, if Reagan were alive and active today the Teabaggers would have nothing to do with him. Reagan actually compromised with the Democrats on issues.

    ReplyDelete
  82. Sorry, that was meant to be response to an earlier comment...I had trouble posting from my phone.

    ReplyDelete
  83. Plus the name "Dolph Ziggler" just screams "midcard 4 Ever!"

    ReplyDelete
  84. I'm glad Orton is finally a heel again. That face nonsense was stale. He's just a natural heel.

    ReplyDelete
  85. His offense? Uh...dropkicks? And uh...neckbreakers?


    He wrestles well as face, with the counters and transitions, but he's got a weak moveset.


    And he's also an unlikable dickbag as a face.

    ReplyDelete
  86. EXACTLY!


    As a heel, he had a girlfriend that he cared for and a friend in Big E, even if they were heels, at least the display of affection is a humanizing trait. As a face, he shows no compassion and no vulnerability. Sure he's "brave", but he's also a cocky frat boy that probably has sex in front of a mirror.

    ReplyDelete
  87. Refreshingly dumb.

    ReplyDelete
  88. That Mike Mears, he doesn't upvote every Scott Keith comment. He doesn't deserve his spot.

    ReplyDelete
  89. Would it be possible to repackage him now? Do you think he's too well known?

    ReplyDelete
  90. I think his main problem is that he doesn't have the Punk/Bryan "do everything possible to get the crowd to react" attitude. He's been raised by WWE, and he seems unwilling or incapable of finding a real character that people can sink their teeth into.


    He's a gifted wrestler but he's strongly lacking the crowd interaction. I think the safety net lacking indies gives guys a lot of practice improvising, and Dolph just doesn't have that desperate hunger and need for cheers and boos.

    ReplyDelete
  91. Beyond domestic policy, Nixon was a pretty good president. He'd make a great secretary of state in my dream cabinet.

    ReplyDelete
  92. ^^^^ HHH closet fan

    ReplyDelete
  93. It probably is too late, which is why they should never have given him such an awful name in the first place.

    ReplyDelete
  94. CM Punk is megastar status, he's at quite possibly the highest he can get, the crowd are eating out of his hand everywhere he goes, he's got the highest level of trust in the back, he's getting some top feuds, theres very little he has left to do. All that said, Daniel Bryan got a much better deal than Punk did in 2011 and considering that the summer of punk was somewhat of a failure...it wasn't that much of one considering Punk's level right now.

    Point being, what they are doing with Dbry is so clearly aimed at making him the top guy in the business...not just a main eventer, it's not half assed, it's not a shot in the dark. It's planned out, they stacked the odds against him, they've created a perfect foil to him in the HHH/McMahon stable and Orton (which is the most important part) they have everything from his big crowd finishers to his merch all flowing right. The guy is primed not only to be the next big main eventer but to be the next "man" in the company.

    So it would be pretty damn hard for them to screw this up.

    ReplyDelete
  95. He introduced himself to everyone for at least 2 years.

    ReplyDelete
  96. TRIM the beard. But he can't lose it entirely.

    ReplyDelete
  97. Not closeted about liking Triple H. He has some of the best psychology I've ever seen and never disappoints on the mic. He's involved himself unnecessarily in angles but that doesn't mean he isn't talented.

    ReplyDelete
  98. I think if he were renamed "Nick Ziggler", with "Dolph" being handwaved as a nickname, it could work.

    ReplyDelete
  99. In relation to #2, don't let Bryan's success retrovalidate all the missteps they've made. Just cause things work out doesn't mean you made the right decision; it means everybody worked their collective ass off to compensate, and to keep things from falling apart.

    ReplyDelete
  100. I definitely see some pessimism and paranoia from the pro-Bryan crowd. Just look at Bryan's run since WrestleMania: He's been main-eventing RAW and Smackdown for months, he's being given 15-20 minute TV matches to shine, he's gone over Orton and The Shield and Cena cleanly in the ring, he's gotten the upper hand on Vince and Stephanie on the mic, he won the WWE championship clean off Cena at one of WWE's biggest PPVs, and now he's being positioned as the top babyface in the company with Cena gone. And you can't say it's been ALL Bryan like he's succeeding despite what WWE wants. They're the ones booking the main events and the long promo segments. Clearly they love Bryan and are pushing him as such, but you still have fans who act like they're not giving Bryan a fair shake.

    ReplyDelete
  101. Nixon basically declared war on the baby boomers on behalf of their parents by painting them as dangerous radicals.

    Nixon did a lot of good things in a pragmatic sense, but I feel his enduring legacy will be that he helped create an America that only cared about a certain segment of the population, and treated the other segments as leeches.

    ReplyDelete
  102. Yeah, few things irritate like fans acting like their favourites are succeeding in spite of the higher-ups. Give credit where it's due, I say.

    ReplyDelete
  103. The same reason you're supposed to cheer for Cena and Sheamus, because.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment