Skip to main content

So, Extreme Rules....

Instead of a Daniel Bryan home game in Seattle, will be at the Izod
Center in Jersey, home of last year's Smarkapalooza Raw following
WrestleMania.
http://www.f4wonline.com/more/more-top-stories/96-wwe/35304-location-of-extreme-rules-2014
So they are possibly going in front of the same crowd that gave
Ziggler one of the all-time pops, shit on Sheamus/Randy Orton, and
amused themselves by singing Fandango's theme song with rematches of
Orton/Batista and Cena/Wyatt? Sign me up.

Personally I'd be happier with WWE getting their head out of their ass and pushing the people we want to watch rather than another shitty PPV ruined by angry fans hijacking the show.  

Comments

  1. Not me, with me not being a big fan of the current product there's nothing I like more than a crowd shitting on their ideas. Sounds good to me

    ReplyDelete
  2. I love it more when it's a cena or orton match.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Extreme Rules after Mania never made sense to me. It should be a PPV that ends feuds with a bunch of gimmick matches but it comes after a PPV that should too.


    Book stuff from Jan. to Mania. In April start clean and build to Extreme Rules in June. Start fresh again in July with MITB and blow it off at SummerSlam. Book from Sept. to Dec do the same with TLC. Repeat.

    ReplyDelete
  4. And speaking of PPVs, they need to bring back In Your House as a network special and call it In Your Ipad.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I'll quote myself from a recent post, as it is applicable here:

    "Look at how we're discussing a MAIN EVENT of Wrestlemania. What the
    fuck are they thinking when their proposed World Title match has to be
    discussed in terms of how best to hide it to avoid mass audience revolt?
    There's not listening to the fans and then there's THIS. It makes no
    fucking sense! Orton's heat has died due to The Authority angle and the
    fans are already shitting on Batista to the point he has to cut
    in-commercial promos praising the home-towns sports teams. How can they
    possibly think a Batista/Orton match is the way to go at 'Mania at this
    point?

    It is literally the Skinner quote: "No Seymour, it's the children who
    are wrong." Except instead of a comedically naive school principal,
    it's people who run a multi-million dollar business. I just don't get
    it."


    If they actually go through with the Batista/Orton match as a World Title match, that will be the most damning indictment of their unwillingness to listen to fans that I've ever seen. It makes no sense from a fiscal standpoint and it's CLEAR the fans don't want it. Now they don't even have the "Extreme Rules is in Bryan's home-town so it will mean more for him to win the belt there," excuse.


    Look, I'm as sick as anybody of the constant "PUSH BRYAN" talk but the reason everyone's perservering with it is because it is the only thing that makes sense and yet it seems they STILL won't do it. They're insane.

    ReplyDelete
  6. That would take forward planning and initiative, so it ain't gonna happen. It would be the ideal way to book, though, I agree. Kinda like four seperate (but combined) 3-month seasons of television.

    ReplyDelete
  7. The Royal Tumblr?

    ReplyDelete
  8. King of the Bing?

    ReplyDelete
  9. I know it is unrealistic to expect them to book Mania to Mania like back in the day, but I don't think it would be hard for them to do what I suggested above if they wanted to.

    ReplyDelete
  10. In Your Tout?


    That sound gross.

    ReplyDelete
  11. "Personally I'd be happier with WWE getting their head out of their ass and pushing the people we want to watch rather than another shitty PPV ruined by angry fans hijacking the show."



    Oh Scott, but it doesn't matter what the fans want. What matters is that they stupidly wrote stupid shit into Batista's contract because they think he's a movie star for some reason.


    Fun fact: Stacy Keibler is a bigger mainstream star than Batista.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Halloween Hulu is way better. Fuck.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Legit question because I don't really follow the ratings or understand them like some other people do: would doing what the live crowds want translate to what the home viewer wants? Or would the ratings absolutely tank because there's evidence the new guys can't draw yet?

    I realize that it is the WWE's fault for not doing shit over the years to build strong new talent. However, I am unsure if the solution would be as easy as transitioning the old guys out and the new guys in.

    It may be a tough situation. Perhaps by trying to quiet the hijacking fans they end up affecting other numbers such as the ratings. Again, my knowledge on this is a little weak so maybe others can comment on it.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Or Huluween Havoc.

    The real winner here is puns.

    ReplyDelete
  15. People who know who Stacy is but not Batista don't watch wrestling so it doesn't matter.

    ReplyDelete
  16. It would be fitting if they returned to using the Backlash name for the first post Mania PPV.

    ReplyDelete
  17. I've said it before but it bears repeating: Imaging if this company put as much effort into giving us what we want instead of working around hostile crowds.

    ReplyDelete
  18. And people who watch wrestling didn't watch Batista's movies.


    And people who will watch Guardians of the Galaxy aren't going to watch Batista wrestle.

    ReplyDelete
  19. There is a pretty big crossover of wrestling and comics fans.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Can't wait for all the Mania rematches at Extreme Rules.

    ReplyDelete
  21. PWI had something up today (more rumor stuff that I'm not really believing) that the locker room is under the impression that Triple H will beat Bryan at WrestleMania. IF that happens and its the middle of the card or second from the top, I really feel bad for who has to follow that match.

    ReplyDelete
  22. It's a bizarre thing that, as the general crowd's wishes have started to meld somewhat with the IWC's (ie. Punk, Bryan being beloved) HHH and presumably Vince's adversarial relationship with the IWC has become an adversarial relationship with the fanbase as a whole. In the past, HHH could snark about guys like Jericho, RVD and co. and say they were "internet darlings" but not big enough to be the guy. Now we have their actual audience saying week-in week-out "We WANT these guys!" and he's persisting with that attitude. It's a frankly bizarre way to run a business and it could only happen in wrestling. Say what they will, they're all still carnies at heart and we're all just the marks who they see as inferior.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Ratings are a tricky thing. Viewers basically need a feeling of consistency in order for ratings to get a good sense of the ratings. I mean, hell, a couple weeks ago they got a huge ratings gain and it was all attributed to Batista. Well, Batista is still in the same exact position and still appears in the same amount of segments, yet the ratings have gone back down to their usual level. Does that make him any more or less a draw than anybody else no the roster now?


    I'm not sure if that really answers your question, but ratings discussions drive me crazy. It's just such an archaic form of measurement and it's not entirely accurate either. Such a tiny percentage of fans are actually Nielsen family -- FAR less than the 10% that is always attributed to "internet fans."

    ReplyDelete
  24. I think that Triple H feels like having a guy work with him is giving them a huge rub whether the Nose lets his opponent win or not. I think Bryan will get the Sheamus Mania 26 treatment with Triple H going over in about 10-12 minutes.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Part of me wants that to happen to see the IWC explode and the live audience + post-Mania RAW go freakin' nuts.

    ReplyDelete
  26. If Triple H wants to build a huge new heel, he should have the Authority "sponsor" or back someone and have them beat Bryan at Mania. Instant mega heel.

    ReplyDelete
  27. I'd say comic book movies have become more mainstream in general. The last couple of women I've dated LOVED the Avengers.

    ReplyDelete
  28. For the record, I don't believe that either, but if he really did have the balls to do that, would we see an NWO level like trash being thrown in the ring? Would they make it a cage match so they couldn't throw trash in the ring? That would definitely give them some unexpected PR.....let me stop giving them ideas lol.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Extreme Rules *USED* to be in the June slot. Why did they move it?

    ReplyDelete
  30. People are already saying no way to Tout.

    ReplyDelete
  31. He's jobbed at 'Mania plenty in the past so I don't know if I buy the rumours. That being said, if they do that, it will be fascinating to watch the crowd outrage. HHH may wish he was viewed as a Legend but, as has become clear from his attempts at post-match sympathy in the last few years, he ain't the Undertaker and a handshake to a plucky opponent is not rub enough alone.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Considering Triple H's reputation among those who now make WrestleMania a spectacle for attendance and such, if there's one thing might cause the fans to throw stuff at the ring and induce a riot, him going over Bryan clean with a Pedigree would do it.

    ReplyDelete
  33. He'd probably hit that pedigree, then take a minute to make the cover and have Bryan lay there and sell it the whole time.


    Fucking douche.

    ReplyDelete
  34. I could just see the headlines on Entertainment Tonight or TMZ "WWE's Wrestlemania event delayed due to angry fans throwing trash in the ring....."

    ReplyDelete
  35. I loved the storytelling of this era and I don't care if I'm hated for enjoying Russo's style in the then Wwf

    ReplyDelete
  36. Actually, I'm wondering if all this Bryan stuff has made the general "angry audience" warm up to Cena a bit. Whereas Orton and Batista and Big Show and Triple H and all these other guys have seemingly either taken Bryan's place or gotten in his way, Cena has basically stepped aside and done his own thing (partially due to injury, admittedly). And while some guys have reacted negatively to Bryan chants (Triple H, Batista, Orton) or have tried to hijack his catchphrase (Big Show), John Cena has SPOKEN OUT for him. He's one of the few top guys who doesn't seem to be the problem.

    ReplyDelete
  37. The most annoying thing? THEY PUSHED HIM IN THE FIRST PLACE! Somebody gave Bryan the US Title, a Money in the Bank win, and a World title. And tons of TV time with Kane in a bullshit angle that he shouldnt' have gotten over, but did anyway. They created this monster and he's way more over than he should be, and they refuse to pull the trigger on it?!


    Fuck, not only that, they put him on that fucking Diva's show, too! They give him a ton of time on mutliple platforms and are SURPRISED people want to see him on top?

    ReplyDelete
  38. Really? I don't even remember that.


    My PPV lineup would be:
    Rumble
    Battleground
    Mania
    Elimination Chamber
    Backlash
    Extreme Rules
    Money In The Bank
    SummerSlam
    No Mercy
    Night of Champions
    Survivor Series
    TLC

    ReplyDelete
  39. If you had to choose one, do you choose Bryan vs. Sheamus or Bryan vs. Triple H at Mania?

    ReplyDelete
  40. Bryan over HHH is the logical way to go.

    ReplyDelete
  41. If ratings are so inconsistent like that, I don't see how slowly shuffling the guys the live fans wanna see further up the card would affect too much. It's not even a matter of completely taking the "draws" out but slowly moving guys up instead of having them tread water.

    I mean, yeah, if the ratings suddenly went down 1.5 points in a month there's a severe problem but it would likely just be some small dips until the consistency you mentioned is in place.

    ReplyDelete
  42. I'd say Bryan vs HHH ONLY if this is his retirement match.

    ReplyDelete
  43. I'd use some WCW names -- Halloween Havoc and The Great American Bash.

    ReplyDelete
  44. I'd like to see that as well, but who knows what they are thinking.

    ReplyDelete
  45. The fucked up thing is THEY THINK they are booking Mania to Mania long-term.

    ReplyDelete
  46. Call me crazy but I loved everything about this Kane-Undertaker feud. It was all so absurd but in a lovable kind of way.

    ReplyDelete
  47. it's still funny, because Triple H still has a large nose.

    ReplyDelete
  48. You're exactly right. And this whole angle since Summerslam has been built around denying him the belt and saying "You're not good enough! You're too short and ugly, etc." which only makes sense if you're planning on giving him his big triumphant moment to prove those comments wrong. Otherwise, why the hell book that way?


    People like Lance Storm say "He's still being pushed. He doesn't have to be World Champion to be a star." To which I'd retort, the WHOLE ANGLE is saying to be a true star he HAS to win the title! If not, what the hell was Summerslam-Hell In A Cell all about?

    ReplyDelete
  49. I never liked Cena more when he was putting Bryan over clean as a sheet at Summerslam.


    Although I did hate how the angle started with Bryan just sort of handing him a title shot.

    ReplyDelete
  50. Elimination Chamber shouldn't be its own PPV anymore. Same as the Cell, it should be used when it's needed, not because it's February.

    ReplyDelete
  51. Question, do you think Cena is a little envious of DB's crowd reactions. DB gets universal cheers from kids and adults alike while he just gets cheers from the kiddies.

    ReplyDelete
  52. Bryan / Triple H with Bryan winning. Bryan's loss amplified by the fact that the audience are now apparently marks for themselves would cause the rest of the show to be ruined if Triple H won.

    Out of all the stupid things WWE has done over the past 6-8 months, giving the crowd a Slammy was the absolute dumbest.

    ReplyDelete
  53. I agree with HIAC but Chamber is like the Rumble at this point, its a big multi man gimmick match.

    ReplyDelete
  54. The melding thing is fascinating.

    The minority has become the majority, but they think they can still pretend they don't exist

    ReplyDelete
  55. Jeez, I know they're sick of the "Bryan" chants but you don't think they'd make him RETIRE, do you?!

    HHH is a monster!

    ReplyDelete
  56. I would throw WCW names on there but realistically, that would never happen. If I could name them whatever I wanted It'd be:


    Rumble
    SuperBrawl
    Mania
    King of the Ring
    One Night Stand
    WrestleWar
    Great American Bash
    SummerSlam
    Clash of the Champions
    Halloween Havoc
    Survivor Series
    Starrcade

    ReplyDelete
  57. I see what you did there.........

    ReplyDelete
  58. Bryan vs HHH for the title.

    ReplyDelete
  59. HHH pins Bryan and becomes WWE champion,I can see the crowd going BATB 96 with that result.

    ReplyDelete
  60. Your_Favourite_LoserFebruary 5, 2014 at 5:56 PM

    i really dont even care anymore. there's nothing we can do. whatever happens, happens. just suck it up and move on

    ReplyDelete
  61. That's out motto,suck it up and move on.

    ReplyDelete
  62. Your_Favourite_LoserFebruary 5, 2014 at 5:57 PM

    "another shitty PPV ruined by angry fans hijacking the show."

    we didn't ruin nothin'! that ppv will go down in history as must-see

    ReplyDelete
  63. Probably. And that Bryan is getting those "universal cheers" is why I don't understand why they don't turn Cena heel and make Bryan the #1 face. He can do all the stuff Cena does -- probably better.

    ReplyDelete
  64. For the bad reasons

    ReplyDelete
  65. See that's how I feel. I'm more amazed they continue to make decisions despite what the fans want (and I'm not saying the fans should always get what they want exactly when they want it). I'll watch for stuff that's interesting, the moment it stops being at least remotely entertaining, I stop watching.

    ReplyDelete
  66. I hate Elimination Chamber matches. The only one I've like is the one from 2005, and not so surprisingly that's the one with the best workers.

    ReplyDelete
  67. But he's a goat! Don't you see?

    ReplyDelete
  68. I just hope it doesn't morph into "they treat us like we are a part of it all, let's shit on everything!" and stays confined to loudly letting them know that they suck.

    ReplyDelete
  69. YES! If the whole point is for the bad guys to say, "you can't be champion," then if that angle doesn't end with that guy BEING CHAMPION, what's the fucking point?

    ReplyDelete
  70. Your_Favourite_LoserFebruary 5, 2014 at 6:01 PM

    the home viewer is a live crowd member waiting to happen

    ReplyDelete
  71. Your_Favourite_LoserFebruary 5, 2014 at 6:02 PM

    i'm not sure people know who she is outside of "i think i saw her name linked to clooney"

    ReplyDelete
  72. HHH going over might have been the plan with the Punk/HHH match (which I can totally see them justifying if Punk was saying he's not re-upping in June), but doing that with Bryan would be so insane.

    ReplyDelete
  73. People who read Us Weekly aren't buying PPVs.

    ReplyDelete
  74. She fucked Clooney, and he's in a movie that hasn't come out yet.


    Yeah, I'd say she's more popular.

    ReplyDelete
  75. Your_Favourite_LoserFebruary 5, 2014 at 6:06 PM

    what, is she all over us weekly or something?

    why are *you* reading us weekly?

    ReplyDelete
  76. Could not be more false.

    ReplyDelete
  77. I hate all of those people that dress up and chant stuff at the theater when I'm trying to watch The Rocky Horror Picture Show. Why can't those people just sit back and quietly enjoy the movie?

    ReplyDelete
  78. Is this just going to be another case similar to Cena? Whenever a wrestler the WWE tries to push gets shit on, they'll just say said wrestler is controversial?

    ReplyDelete
  79. You've introduced a fresh new twist to an American pastime.

    Good job!

    ReplyDelete
  80. How much would the company and the wrestlers lose if they changed to a once a week super card house show in big markets? God knows it would benefit the bodies and mindsets of the wrestlers.

    ReplyDelete
  81. But if the PPV is already shitty, how can the fans ruin it?

    ReplyDelete
  82. Your_Favourite_LoserFebruary 5, 2014 at 6:30 PM

    i thought you said he had a great idea

    ReplyDelete
  83. Stranger in the AlpsFebruary 5, 2014 at 6:31 PM

    Slight threadjack here: Netflix is now showing The History of WWE. All 9 hours of it.

    ReplyDelete
  84. When the PPV was titled "Backlash" it made a lot of sense.

    ReplyDelete
  85. Heel Cena, Batista, Orton, and Lesnar is a super group isn't a great idea, it is the GREATEST IDEA.

    ReplyDelete
  86. Your_Favourite_LoserFebruary 5, 2014 at 6:32 PM

    what's your favorite country?


    say it! say it!


    asshole!

    ReplyDelete
  87. The doc is legit great. I was shocked at how much they were able to put in there.

    ReplyDelete
  88. Stranger in the AlpsFebruary 5, 2014 at 6:33 PM

    I haven't picked up the set yet, so I may just check it out over the weekend on NF.

    ReplyDelete
  89. She banged Clooney and was on Dancing with the Stars. In the WWE's eyes, SHE should have won the Royal Rumble and main evented Wrestlemania.

    ReplyDelete
  90. Has ton of controversy in there,right?

    ReplyDelete
  91. If GoTG becomes a hit Batista will beat Bruno Sammartino record as champion.

    ReplyDelete
  92. Stranger in the AlpsFebruary 5, 2014 at 6:34 PM

    I haven't seen it, but I'm assuming that there will be some rewritten history in there at some point.

    ReplyDelete
  93. Switch Eliminator Chamber and Backlash

    ReplyDelete
  94. a 9 hour documentary?

    ReplyDelete
  95. Not really from what I remember. They even go pretty hardcore into the steroid trials.

    ReplyDelete
  96. Seriously, just Batista, Orton, and Cena together as a heel faction would be an amazing idea post Wrestlemania. At this point, WWE can hedge their wagon to Bryan

    ReplyDelete
  97. Brock can be their "break only in case of emergencies" weapon.

    ReplyDelete
  98. That finish would be consistent with previous results.

    Triple H has "made" three men in wrestling: Batista, Chris Benoit, and John Cena. That's all. No one else has decisively defeated Triple H the way these three men did in 2004, 2005, and 2006. Before and after that? The man is useless. He actually thought (on multiple occasions) that booking himself to initially beat a guy in the first showdown to set up the rematch would actually generate better numbers, when classic storytelling shows that it's usually the COMPLETE OPPOSITE.

    Examples:

    --Wrestlemania XVI, where he decides to put himself over The Rock. The idea here is that Rock would eventually get him at Backlash and win the title. This was the one time the formula worked, but then again Rock would be cheered regardless.
    --Wrestlemania XIX, where he books himself over Booker T. He insults him, he says mean-spirited things with racial undertones, and....no comeuppance. Triple H takes a short nap after pedigreeing him, and kills Booker's heat in the process.
    --Summerslam 2003, where he puts himself over Goldberg, for Christ's sake! Goldberg was a complete afterthought when this show was over, and eventually winning the title wouldn't change a damn thing about it.
    --Unforgiven 2004 and Wrestlemania 25: Randy Orton gets the honors twice, first as a member of Evolution and later as a member of the Legacy. I've never seen a more deflated ending for a babyface than the end of Wrestlemania XXV. Sure, eventually Orton won the title at Backlash, but not before Triple H cements himself as the winner of the main event on the Silver Anniversary of Wrestlemania.
    --Elimination Chamber/Wrestlemania 2010: Triple H had a chance to make Sheamus out of the gate, but he pinned him twice before Sheamus could finally get a chance to destroy him at Extreme Rules.

    See, that's not good decision making. Outside of the guys listed at the top, Triple H seems to like making sure that his needs are met first before he can elevate anyone and pass any kind of torch.

    With that said...expect Triple H to beat Bryan at Wrestlemania XXX (when it matters), and then Bryan will get his piddly revenge win at the following PPV.

    STUPID.

    ReplyDelete
  99. If anything, the fans hijacking the show makes it more entertaining. It helps if you picture Vince throwing a shit fit backstage.


    "I don't understand it! I gave them another Cena/Orton match, and they're still chanting for Daniel Bryan. WHAT DO THEY WANT FROM ME?!"

    ReplyDelete
  100. Except Batista is not the star of the movie. Bradley Cooper's voice is.

    ReplyDelete
  101. Bradley Cooper isn't either. Chris Pratt is.

    ReplyDelete
  102. It's better that way. The Backlash after the biggest show of the year!

    ReplyDelete
  103. That's basically what they did in 1998 and 1999, too. The storylines basically reset after WrestleMania XIV and gradually built towards Summerslam. Then everything after Summerslam culminated in the Deadly Games Tournament. Then after Survivor Series, everything built to Rock vs. Austin at WrestleMania XV and so on...


    Ah, the days when the WWF actually had a long term direction.

    ReplyDelete
  104. Survivor Series of Poker?

    ReplyDelete
  105. You're on to something with John Cena turning heel the night after Wrestlemania XXX. I mean, the bulk of their fans would be locked in, so why not take a chance?

    Only problem...the minute he turns, you guys are going to fall in love with him. He'd be very good as a heel, and I don't think you guys know HOW good he would be, if it happened.

    ReplyDelete
  106. The WWE would have a LOT of work to do in rebuilding the reputation of Cody and Ziggler to get them to even remotely be believable. Hell, even with DB, I'm halfway programmed to think there would be a screwjob in a match with either of these guys, Zigs and Cody are jobbers compared to them.

    ReplyDelete
  107. If this is true, it's pretty remarkable that they would change the location of PPVs to actively avoid the Bryan thing.

    ReplyDelete
  108. No! No rematches after Mania. f that noise. The backlash after Chamber yo.

    ReplyDelete
  109. Fandango's totally winning the WWE Title

    ReplyDelete
  110. I too think it's possible this stuff starts a terrible trend. I'll point to the examples of Daniel Bryan chants while Punk was getting put through the announce table at RR, and then chanting for Punk during the best match of the Orton-Bryan series (though to be fair it is the 100th match they've had together in 6 months) I think the fans are starting to fall in love with the idea that they can be heard and acknowledged for going "against the grain" ie: chanting for anything BUT what happens in the ring.

    I get that initially it was based off legitimate protest, but as it spreads to the mainstream fans it may become the equivalent of the people who have to throw themselves in front of the camera during local news broadcasts.

    ReplyDelete
  111. Only way a Cena heel turn backfires is if they put him against bland babyfaces like the Miz. Put him against Bryan and people will choose Bryan over him.

    ReplyDelete
  112. Plus, when he was a heel, Cena made a Kobe Bryant joke. What if it happens again?

    ReplyDelete
  113. Primetime Players will another new manager.

    ReplyDelete
  114. Stranger in the AlpsFebruary 5, 2014 at 7:13 PM

    Documentary + matches.

    ReplyDelete
  115. I've never seen a company in such open opposition of its own fanbase. Like, why even become an entertainment entity if you're going to go to such lengths to not do what the fans want to see? Egos, I'll tell ya.

    ReplyDelete
  116. This idea is so awesome I'm angry at you over the fact that I didn't come up with it myself.

    ReplyDelete
  117. It took me a minute to process lol

    ReplyDelete
  118. Less offensive than some options. I'd have him Honky Tonk the hell out of it for a couple of months. Summer Rae with a megaphone, the whole nine.

    ReplyDelete
  119. Was it ever confirmed Extreme Rules was definitely going to be in Seattle?

    ReplyDelete
  120. The idea is so awesome I'm angry Vince didn't come up with it.

    ReplyDelete
  121. Not to mention facing Undertaker, losing, then Undertaker challenges HIM to a rematch at 28.

    ReplyDelete
  122. I watched up until they got to the Attitude Era and thought it was great. Are the matches on Netflix?

    ReplyDelete
  123. Sooo.. Am I the ONLY one that thinks Wyatt/Cena could be good?

    ReplyDelete
  124. I think since Batista already won the Rumble they should have Bryan win the chamber then as he is celebrating, Heyman comes to the ring with Lesnar. Lesnar then beats the living crap out of him. Batista makes the save.


    Bryan(c) vs. Batista vs. Lesnar at Mania for the belt


    Bryan retains somehow then defends in a singles match with Lesnar at Extreme Rules.


    Undertaker works with Reigns or something.

    ReplyDelete
  125. It sounds great! For something like Extreme Rules or Payback.

    It's not exactly how you should sell the signature show on its 30th Anniversary.

    ReplyDelete
  126. Wyatt changed my mind completely at the Rumble. The guy has talent. He is a modern day Mick Foley.

    ReplyDelete
  127. It could be good. It's just not a WrestleMania program.

    ReplyDelete
  128. What would you like to see Cena do as his Mania program?

    ReplyDelete
  129. Yeah I thought that he looked great. I mean he was working with Bryan and that gets you have way there, but I though that he held his end up.

    ReplyDelete
  130. Besides Taker, since they aren't going that route.

    ReplyDelete
  131. I thought it was a total puff piece.

    ReplyDelete
  132. I've been on that bandwagon since forever, but if they're not doing it I think Wyatt is a decent program.


    Of course Wyatt needs to win,

    ReplyDelete
  133. "may become the equivalent of the people who have to throw themselves in front of the camera during local news broadcasts."

    Very apt comparison, but at the same time wouldn't you think - as far as WWE is concerned - if fans want to pay to get into an arena to chant the opposite of what's in the ring rather than what it's in it, it's win/win for them at least in terms of live event revenue?

    ReplyDelete
  134. Why not Cena vs. Orton vs. Bryan?

    The whole thing is eight months in the making, dating back to Summerslam 2013.

    ReplyDelete
  135. Bryan retaining at Mania and Wyatt beating Cena would throw Bryan vs. Wyatt into an immediate title program because of Wyatt's Rumble win. I'd like that.

    ReplyDelete
  136. That would be neat. The chamber should've been for another #1 contenders spot.

    ReplyDelete
  137. I don't think they're actively avoiding anything by going to IZOD, dude.

    If anything, they're walking into the fire. Much like the March 3 Raw.

    ReplyDelete
  138. We will never let that one gol

    ReplyDelete
  139. I have been trying to think of any company, not just an entertainment one, that does this and I'm drawing blanks. Can you imagine Pepsi Co. continuing to push Crystal Pepsi as consumers continue to crap on it? It took them 3 minutes to get that stuff off the shelves.

    ReplyDelete
  140. That would be awesome. A fresh main event scene just like that, with two guys that work well together.

    ReplyDelete
  141. Go ask Abe Washington what happens.

    ReplyDelete
  142. Adidas and the NBA seem to be doing with the dreaded sleeved jersey abominations, now that I think about it. They've been universally crapped on by both the players and the fans yet they keep trying to shove them down our throats.

    ReplyDelete
  143. Well the difference is Pepsi has Coke, Dr Pepper, bottled water, etc as competition, WWE has.........MMA....although not really the same.

    ReplyDelete
  144. I was for them unifying the two titles, but situations like this make more sense for them to have two world titles. Cena and Orton and Batista can go blah blah on one of the titles, and Bryan vs. Wyatt can wrestle for another.

    ReplyDelete
  145. I don't think they are going to last through the year if they don't sell. Now if they were pushing it for the next six years while fans openly revolted well...........

    ReplyDelete
  146. But that was the post WM crowd, with out of county/ state people. Are we sure that the regular crowd can pull it off.

    ReplyDelete
  147. Granted it's not a 1:1 comparison, but still no other company purposely antagonizes their fanbase like those boys from Stamford.

    ReplyDelete
  148. You can write another letter!

    ReplyDelete
  149. Maybe WWE didn't like all of those guys hogging spotlight that could be on the guys they want it on.

    ReplyDelete
  150. No I agree with you, I'm just saying the reason they can get away with it is because there's no real pressure on them from a competing company to change their ways. If this were 1996 instead of 2014, I would feel pretty safe in predicting DB would probably either have the championship, or be a MAJOR favorite to win the championship at Wrestlemania because they would be trying to steal viewers from WCW.

    ReplyDelete
  151. That general area has some of the best wrestling fans in the world. Anything close to NYC will bring some rowdy crowds.

    ReplyDelete
  152. Why not? We are always bitching about WWE never elevating anyone, this is their shot with Bray.

    ReplyDelete
  153. Lol, I felt like such an idiot for that, and for fighting with Jobber123.

    I almost feel like Sgt. Slaughter here....I want my country back!

    ReplyDelete
  154. It's getting me so mad, that I'm thinking about getting an angry avatar.

    ReplyDelete
  155. Although they don't have a wrestling company competing with them they are still battling for entertainment dollars. That's why I don't understand the mindset.

    I went to Raw back in November and spent a total of about 70 bucks. There are still other ways I could have spent that for entertainment. It's like they don't believe I will, or don't care.

    ReplyDelete
  156. I thought Big Show made that joke.

    ReplyDelete
  157. I'm just scared that after Mania they will treat Bray like everyone else and he'll be in the 50/50 mix.

    ReplyDelete
  158. You make valid point but I still say take the risk

    ReplyDelete
  159. The WWE app need a camera on Vince at all times now. That would be a real fun second screen experience.

    ReplyDelete
  160. Yeah but here's my thing with Wyatt - why would he care about titles? What's his endgame and motivation?

    ReplyDelete
  161. The guy has been around eight months, and has not even had one real, tangible, plausible reason for anything he's done so far. That's why.

    ReplyDelete
  162. If I ever disagree with you about anything again, point me to this post and I will rescind whatever I am saying.

    ReplyDelete
  163. I almost feel like this is Cena's "Rock n'Sock vs. Evolution" match.

    ReplyDelete
  164. Fine. With the powers vested in me, I officially pardon you for past crimes against the BoD. Your punishment is teaming with Jim Duggan and feuding against jobbers.

    ReplyDelete
  165. Promo videos following you around the country or GTFO

    ReplyDelete
  166. It gets buried on the card and elevates no one, that's why. If Taker-?, HHH-Bryan, and Batista-Lesnar/Orton are going on the card, Cena-Wyatt is buried (I'm beginning to hate that word, but bear with me) on the mid card. It will have all the impact of Sheamus-HHH at WM26 or Batista-Umaga at WM24. If Wyatt wins, it's not making a big enough splash on that particular night. If Cena wins, then it's business as usual.


    Don't get me wrong--it could be a hell of a match and a program to elevate Wyatt. But it'll get lost on Mania night.

    ReplyDelete
  167. Far be it from me to actually know what's in VKM's mind (not sure I'd want to know actually lol), but my guess is they think something like this:


    While they want to be more than just a wrasslin company, they know they dominate "this" space, they ran their biggest competition out of business years ago, so they "know" what it takes to run their business. Which they do, but times change, tastes change. What do the fans know about "this business"? they've been doing it for decades.


    And if you get enough insular thinking like that, without any outside pressure which threatens their well being (their financials aren't setting the world on fire, but they aren't poor either), you get plans that don't change no matter what the fans say. As long as they meet their minimum numbers for Wall St., they're good to go.

    ReplyDelete
  168. You're a terrible person and worse BoD poster.

    ReplyDelete
  169. How did they sell the signature show on its 20th Anniversary?

    It's tradition. Every 10 years, three guys fight for the main title at Wrestlemania.

    ReplyDelete
  170. Plus, "the Devil made me do it" is not a justified reason for his actions. It's a punchline to a Little Caesar's commercial.

    ReplyDelete
  171. Trust me, with a card this lackluster, noting is getting lost if it stands out. Bray going over in 4 star or close match will make him.

    ReplyDelete
  172. Perhaps the Authority are his higher powers.

    ReplyDelete
  173. If the top of the card does fall apart and they put too much stock into Batista-Orton, you will be right about that one.

    ReplyDelete
  174. Why do you need a reason? It is entertaining. He fucks with people and cuts creepy promos, what is not to love?

    ReplyDelete
  175. Yeah, and it would fit with the way this year has been going.

    ReplyDelete
  176. As much as I hate to admit it, you are right. From that pov it makes sense, but nothing says I have to like it. Though I don't think many of us do

    ReplyDelete
  177. FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF

    ReplyDelete
  178. I was about to reply about X and was like "Oh yeah..."

    ReplyDelete
  179. Don't get me wrong, brother. The character is quite fascinating...but Chris Jericho played a better Max Cady in 2008 than Bray is doing right now. At least Chris Jericho was a wronged man who sought out his own twisted justice.

    ReplyDelete
  180. I think Bray's doing more than fine with his character, master evil plan or not. His interactions with the Shield were the only highlights to last week's Raw other than the main event.

    ReplyDelete
  181. Triple H even referenced Yokozuna having to defend the title against both Bret and Luger the week after Shawn signed the contract.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment