Skip to main content

Steph V Brie

Am I the only one who wants to see training montages with HHH/Steph a la Vince/Shane back in '99?  Complete with chicken chasing, chugging raw egg yolks & Steph screaming "I HATE BRIE!!  I HATE HER!! SHE'S GONNA BE MY BITCH!!"

​Sadly, the chickens and Steph's implants were sold off as part of the cost-cutting, so I don't know how well those montages would work now.  But I look forward to them trying!  Of course, that would also imply that they have a sense of humor about how terribly acted this whole storyline really is thanks to Brie, but given that it was positioned in the main event slot of RAW, I don't think that's the case.  ​

Comments

  1. I'm watching the Vince vs Stephanie match right. Brie vs Stephanie would be lucky to reach 10% of the brutality of this match.



    Vince is getting NUCLEAR heat!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Featuring the frumpiest Stephanie of all time.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Charismatic eNegro Jef VinsonAugust 1, 2014 at 7:25 AM

    If DBry was up to it physically I would have liked to have seen video of him working with B-Cup Bella and teaching her submission holds (specifically the Yes lock)

    ReplyDelete
  4. I'm glad to see someone agrees with my take on this whole angle. I give them a lot of credit for positioning the angle the way they have, and Stephanie has been flat-out terrific, but Jesus Christ, Brie Bella is just an AWFUL actress and I think it's accentuated even more when she's put up against Stephanie, whose skills trump her tenfold.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Charismatic eNegro Jef VinsonAugust 1, 2014 at 7:26 AM

    She was fine until they put the mic in front of her.

    ReplyDelete
  6. She's just terrible. There's no way around it. She seems like a nice girl and I particularly thought she came off that way in that Daniel Bryan WM documentary they have on the Network, but she is amateurish. It's almost embarrassing.

    ReplyDelete
  7. You don't really wear makeup to a no-holds barred match.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Charismatic eNegro Jef VinsonAugust 1, 2014 at 7:29 AM

    Oh don't get it twisted, I think she is terrible. But I feel that if they limited her exposure you wouldn't know HOW terrible she was.
    If RAW was any indication the crowd is turning on her and they will boo her unmercifully at the PPV.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Which is why they will have Daniel Bryan in her corner to prevent that from happening.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I was thinking...Cena Vs. Brock II is a really important main event because it's the first hyped-up top babyface (arguably) vs. heel monster in a long time. If it doesn't pop a good buyrate, I'd say Cena, a good merch and house show draw but not really a ratings or PPV dynamo (the big money), has to take some blame.

    ReplyDelete
  11. The funny part is I think that whole deal was like a week before her wedding and everyone was threatening Vince not to actually bruise her up by accident in that match, considering Vince is a klutz in the ring most of the time.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Charismatic eNegro Jef VinsonAugust 1, 2014 at 7:31 AM

    Vince could get nuclear heat visit one of those Make-A-Wish kids.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Cena vs Brock III.

    ReplyDelete
  14. That would be the smart thing to do, but I get a feeling they're not putting DB on TV until he's ready to come back. Which I also understand.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Man, if Summerslam was in a mark city, Steph might get cheered over her.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Sometimes, The WWE can have a sense of humor about itself and it works wonders. Team Hell No was meant to be a midcard joke and it created a main eventer the crowd loved.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Charismatic eNegro Jef VinsonAugust 1, 2014 at 7:32 AM

    I wonder if he'll be there at the beginning or if he comes out mid-squash?

    ReplyDelete
  18. That's best for the long-term, but they can't afford to play for the long term at the expense of Summerslam. They need as many hooks for Summerslam as possible.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Charismatic eNegro Jef VinsonAugust 1, 2014 at 7:33 AM

    I still think she will.

    ReplyDelete
  20. I think Brock-Cena is enough of a hook for Summerslam. Bryan showing up in the corner of his wife isn't going to put more eyeballs on the show.

    ReplyDelete
  21. I'm afraid you've got some bad views.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Not to mention you're blowing your Bryan-welcome-back pop just to save his wife some boos? No thanks. They've done everything within reason to get Brie over in this stupid angle, and she hasn't taken advantage of it because she's terrible.


    I'm sure she's a nice girl, but she's awful in this role.

    ReplyDelete
  23. I don't really see it.

    ReplyDelete
  24. MikeyMike, WitnessAugust 1, 2014 at 7:42 AM

    Funny how it kinda happened by accident. Their biggest star in years!

    ReplyDelete
  25. This is a rare instance. Not to mention that they didn't want him to be a main eventer coming out of that team.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Charismatic eNegro Jef VinsonAugust 1, 2014 at 7:43 AM

    This role was tailor-made for AJ Lee.

    ReplyDelete
  27. If I wasn't a Network subscriber, and I wasn't interested in Summerslam (I am and I am), advertising Bryan in Brie's corner isn't making me feel any different.

    ReplyDelete
  28. MikeyMike, WitnessAugust 1, 2014 at 7:44 AM

    Backlash 2003 got forgotten about. Funny how different the dynamic was for that match.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Wasn't there a teased Stephanie/AJ feud that got aborted about 2 days after it started?

    ReplyDelete
  30. I believe the WWE should take the blame entirely for how well their PPVs go, not the stars. They are so restrictive on stories and the way the talent gets over, that they should be fully blamed when things go wrong. Usually when things go right, they loosen the reigns.

    ReplyDelete
  31. MikeyMike, WitnessAugust 1, 2014 at 7:45 AM

    You know that Brie putting Steph in the Yes Lock is for sure happening.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Charismatic eNegro Jef VinsonAugust 1, 2014 at 7:45 AM

    Yeah. I don't know why.

    ReplyDelete
  33. I think it's time to retire the "pop a good buyrate" phrase as a means of gauging the effectiveness of a show's draw.

    ReplyDelete
  34. MikeyMike, WitnessAugust 1, 2014 at 7:46 AM

    She certainly had a different look. I'd take 03 Steph over today's Steph though.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Charismatic eNegro Jef VinsonAugust 1, 2014 at 7:47 AM

    That will be when C-Cup Bella interferes.
    Why do I have the feeling they do the "Barry Windham dressed like Sting" switch here?

    ReplyDelete
  36. I hadn't thought of that, but I could see it since Steph hasn't been in a match in forever.

    ReplyDelete
  37. MikeyMike, WitnessAugust 1, 2014 at 7:48 AM

    That would be even worse than Windham dressed like Sting.
    Brie and Nikki don't resemble each other at all anymore.
    There's the obvious reason and even in the face there's a pretty distinct difference.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Don't be a lemon Scott!

    ReplyDelete
  39. MikeyMike, WitnessAugust 1, 2014 at 7:54 AM

    I'm a bigger fan of Brie but she looks anemic in that Seahawks pic.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Rusev winning the title is the logical choice.. That's why they won't do it of course.. idiots

    ReplyDelete
  41. Charismatic eNegro Jef VinsonAugust 1, 2014 at 7:56 AM

    Probably because she's picked up DBry's eating habits.

    ReplyDelete
  42. Yup so I was wondering what they rounded up to 700k from. I absolutely believe Dave. So it's officially at 690k which means that theyve gained 23,000 people since mania. Ouch.

    Also there seems to be some thinking around here that the international release will put it over the top. 1)no matter what it does internationally it still needs 1.4 million domestic subs to make up for its costs and here and the loss of domestic ppv income which is on its way to zero 2)if the Canada example is anything like the rest of the world they are getting a watered down shitty version and not many people are going to buy that

    ReplyDelete
  43. Didnt everyone and their mother hate bad news backstage. I know in Brets book he devotes about 40 pgs to his hatred of this man.

    ReplyDelete
  44. But if Rusev becomes U.S. Champion, it means he'll have to lose non-title matches every week to Cena, Orton, and Sheamus.

    ReplyDelete
  45. Not sure if it'll carry the same heat as when Nikita Koloff won the US title from Magnum TA. I mean it needs to be done, but not sure if it'll be more than "ok".

    ReplyDelete
  46. MikeyMike, WitnessAugust 1, 2014 at 7:57 AM

    And Nikki's picked up Cena's. I could legit see Nikki's weight exploding once Cena leaves her for a 22 year old in a few years.

    ReplyDelete
  47. I wonder if they thought the #s would be this bad from jump. I assume the planned on a slow start, but man.

    ReplyDelete
  48. Wwe sure is spending a lot of time building up a piss break match. I'll be there live and I can guarantee you I wont be in my seat to see watch old Stephanie fucking have a wrestling match agaisnt a diva...even a dbry run in won't make this worth it.

    On the other hand my dream scenario is that either this match or reigns vs orton goes on last so I can leave before the traffic.

    ReplyDelete
  49. They cut costs to the point that they only need 500,000 subscribers to break even.

    ReplyDelete
  50. Charismatic eNegro Jef VinsonAugust 1, 2014 at 8:00 AM

    I don't know how old the Bellas are but in about 10 years they will look more like mother and daughter than sisters.

    ReplyDelete
  51. This is what happens when you only allow employees who are yes men to talk to you. They never ever saw this coming. No one wants the damn thing

    ReplyDelete
  52. MikeyMike, WitnessAugust 1, 2014 at 8:00 AM

    I think they just hit the big 3-0. And absolutely. Already looks a few years apart in age.

    ReplyDelete
  53. Brice's awful at acting, but she's likeable, and her actual relationship with Bryan helps her on TV, as the fans are aware they care about each other. Unlike Nikki, who always comes off as the sarcastic high school queen who is a babyface because they make her, complete with sighing and eye-rolling. "Ugh, I have to be NICE to people? I hate this job."

    ReplyDelete
  54. People do want the Network, but they've done a terribawful job of promoting it. Competing with stuff like Hulu, Netflix, and other pay channels, plus free stuff like DM and YT isn't easy.

    ReplyDelete
  55. Charismatic eNegro Jef VinsonAugust 1, 2014 at 8:02 AM

    Nikki just embraces being a bitch.

    ReplyDelete
  56. For real? If so, that's pretty cool (well, not for the future endeavored people, but you know what I mean)

    ReplyDelete
  57. Your loss. It's a McMahon match, so I guarantee that they pull out all the stops to make it an entertaining spectacle.

    ReplyDelete
  58. They way overestimated and combine that with the fact they are putting out a weak product, that is why the numbers are where they are at.

    Did people really think adding SNME was going to add a ton of subscribers?

    ReplyDelete
  59. So you are calling them idiots before even seeing if they're gonna do it? That is a peculiar attitude.

    ReplyDelete
  60. MikeyMike, WitnessAugust 1, 2014 at 8:03 AM

    Ouch. How many people did they fire?

    ReplyDelete
  61. Yes, that helps, but what will really be telling is Q3, when the first batch of 6-month subs runs out. Growth right now is terrible unless it's Wrestlemania, and gaining only 23k subs since then isn't good at all.

    ReplyDelete
  62. What if he rechristens it as the Russian title? Then he's in unchartered waters.

    ReplyDelete
  63. MikeyMike, WitnessAugust 1, 2014 at 8:04 AM

    He's allowed to have an opinion.

    ReplyDelete
  64. MikeyMike, WitnessAugust 1, 2014 at 8:05 AM

    My interest in Rusev has already decreased dramatically.

    ReplyDelete
  65. The tough thing is that it's logical to give Rusev the US title and give him heat, but they backed down a couple of weeks ago when Russia was blamed for that plane crash, so it's a tough spot.

    They can't go for giving him heat for being Russian when they're going to get heat for him being, you know, Russian.

    ReplyDelete
  66. Due to my own fear of new technology, I still truly believe that lots of fans are simply intimidated by the Network, and are embarrassed to ask questions about it and stuff, so they are resisting it. I really don't think it's about a good or bad product. (At least for the older demographic that I just mentioned). I really don't think they'd go "Hey, Dolph Ziggler is getting pushed, so NOW I'm getting the network.

    ReplyDelete
  67. Rusev is currently feuding with a pro-American wrestler. It's perfect. Give America an evil foreigner to chase. They could run this until Mania with Rusev blustering and ducking Swagger until taking the ankle lock in San Francisco or a suburb thereof.

    ReplyDelete
  68. Charismatic eNegro Jef VinsonAugust 1, 2014 at 8:07 AM

    Best of seven series of GTFO.

    ReplyDelete
  69. so am I. And I think his comment was ridiculous. (lulz, used your own logic against you!)

    ReplyDelete
  70. The network is one of the easiest things in the world to sign up for and access.

    ReplyDelete
  71. "Bad News came up to me, with tears in his eyes, and he said...no, wait, actually he just beat the shit out of me."

    ReplyDelete
  72. It's awful growth, really.

    And the international Numbers aren't going to jump it up that much as they are down across the board too.

    ReplyDelete
  73. Tell that to someone who only uses the internet for e-mails, and for stock updates, which their kids gave them an easy link to access. Not everyone is like us.

    ReplyDelete
  74. One of which must be a flag match.

    ReplyDelete
  75. That's why I say the network doing poorly is due to poor promotion. Is it a good idea to watch the current product at a discounted price? Sure, so promote it as such. Is it a good product to watch old WCW matches? Sure, again, promote it as such.

    You can't say "it's like Netflix" because (as we've seen before) the fed thinks its fanbase is made up of idiots. So, you have to train them on how to obtain the Network, what it does and what you can get from it.

    More than anything, their lack of promotion on this, to me, is the most glaring fact that they're out of touch with their fanbase.

    ReplyDelete
  76. The only thing that bothers me about the network is how they won't put up more content to the archives to the point where it feels like a very aggressive attack on those of us who purchased the network for it. Why have Joey Styles promise every episode of ECW and then only put up a few and then stop putting any up? Why not provide stuff from any of the different territories they own? Or even put up pre raw WWF shows?

    And it's one thing to abandon the archive because you don't give a shit about it or the people that paid to see it, but then why have such an attitude about making the ppvs suck since they are free. It seems like the wwe is unwilling to put out good b show ppvs because they are free so who cares, and also unwilling to utilize the archives because they don't like old time fans. I'm confused as to what the goal of the network is or who its aimed too? Do they really think people want wwe original programming like total divas or legends house? I dunno but they need to pull their heads out of Vince's ass and improve the network if they want it to be huge.

    ReplyDelete
  77. Meh, those things are overrated and predictable. Just wake me up for the obvious 7th match.

    ReplyDelete
  78. Who on the roster is even popular to run a best of 7 series with that would make people care? At least when Nikita won, people LOVED Magnum.

    ReplyDelete
  79. It'd be just like watching an NBA series!

    ReplyDelete
  80. What stops? Run ins? A table spot? Dude I'd rather go get some beers or take a piss, or hopefully even leave early.

    ReplyDelete
  81. If my 55 year old parents can figure out this whole "Cutting the cord" thing, than anyone can.

    ReplyDelete
  82. Charismatic eNegro Jef VinsonAugust 1, 2014 at 8:12 AM

    Have Rusev sweep.

    ReplyDelete
  83. So, you paid money to see a live event, and then fantasize about leaving early?

    ReplyDelete
  84. This. A lot of wrestling fans are over 40 or do jobs that don't require internet access. The 800 number and the advertising really needed to drive home that they'd walk people through exactly how to do it.

    ReplyDelete
  85. I think even someone like that could figure it out. It is literally that easy.

    ReplyDelete
  86. It really couldn't be easier, sign up, download, watch. But I agree people are dumb and the wwe fanbase is probably the dumbest of the dumb.

    ReplyDelete
  87. Yeah, you'd think that most people who wanted it badly enough have already obtained it, so the international numbers shouldn't make a substantial difference.

    With the NFL around the corner, I have a feeling the Q3 report is going to be very, very bad. And I know the fed can cut more people, but how much more can you cut?

    ReplyDelete
  88. I think Dodger fans are notorious for arriving in the 3rd inning, and leaving in the 7th. That's what they do!

    ReplyDelete
  89. a best of 7 sweep, and a 30 second ladder match are 2 things I would mark out for, just for the sheer balls it would require.

    ReplyDelete
  90. Charismatic eNegro Jef VinsonAugust 1, 2014 at 8:15 AM

    It would suck if that match on went last and the crowd leaves en masse to beat traffic.
    The visual alone would be crazy and next to impossible for the announcers to cover for.

    ReplyDelete
  91. Supposedly they cut 60 people (based on a CNNMoney report). WWE Magazine is toast.

    They could still cut live talent, but wondering where do you go from there.

    ReplyDelete
  92. I'd love to get out early if the matches I wanted to see are over. Absolutely. Its moot point because Cena vs Brock is going on last but if they could somehow put steph vs brie on last (like piper vs Lawler at the kotr or something) then I'd be thrilled to beat the traffic.

    ReplyDelete
  93. Lesnar/Cena is going on last, no doubt.

    ReplyDelete
  94. I think he'd have been great in JCP. Shit, they had Kendall Windham.. BNB would have killed his promos and probably feuded with Ronnie Garvin. A feud with Dusty would have been great too.. a lot of jive talking and bloody matches..

    ReplyDelete
  95. But they don't KNOW it's "that easy". People are often afraid of change, that's all I'm saying. Hell, WWE could hire techs to come to fans houses and install it for them, step by step. I bet that would actually get them extra suscribers.

    ReplyDelete
  96. Well that happened to me a concert out here, I went to go before the encore and about half the crowd had the same idea

    ReplyDelete
  97. Have the 4th match be a 30 second ladder match, and there's your dream.

    ReplyDelete
  98. Just doing a little fantasy booking

    ReplyDelete
  99. They make it a point to have commercials during every RAW that give instructions.

    ReplyDelete
  100. This. People act like "it's so easy" to do X or Y, but there's other factors involved as well.

    ReplyDelete
  101. Which people complain about and say why are they beating me over the head with this!?!? Like with the app.

    ReplyDelete
  102. People act like things are so hard when they really aren't.

    ReplyDelete
  103. I laughed....and I'm the one who sent the e-mail.

    ReplyDelete
  104. Yeah, that's the one.

    ReplyDelete
  105. I agree about the original programming.

    No one is buying it to watch reality shows or the developmental program

    ReplyDelete
  106. I've never stayed for a chargers game past the 3rs quarter. I will watch padres games to the very end but only because I can walk home from the stadium.

    Also FYI, dodgers fans rape, rob, steal, kill, and maim. That's what those animals are notorious for.

    ReplyDelete
  107. Not saying it's not easy. Human factors are something no one can really account for.

    Otherwise, Amazon wouldn't promote face-to-face chatting for their Kindle tech support.

    ReplyDelete
  108. Stranger in the AlpsAugust 1, 2014 at 8:20 AM

    I have an update for you all: they're bringing an Ebola patient to Atlanta. That's right, the Ebola virus has reached American soil. I've seen Outbreak, and I've seen Contagion. It was nice knowing you all. I will be in my basement with the Network until this rolls over.

    ReplyDelete
  109. Charismatic eNegro Jef VinsonAugust 1, 2014 at 8:20 AM

    I would LOVE to see someone just run up the ladder and grab the briefcase.

    ReplyDelete
  110. WWE thinks people want what they tell them they want, because they're awesome and wouldn't they know what people really want anyway?

    ReplyDelete
  111. Charismatic eNegro Jef VinsonAugust 1, 2014 at 8:20 AM

    Miami Heat fans do that too.

    ReplyDelete
  112. Expect a shoot interview a day. Just let me seal myself in my apartment first

    ReplyDelete
  113. Not for people that still wonder why their WebTV doesn't work anymore..

    ReplyDelete
  114. I don't think Bad News needed to be in his prime for it to work. He was a capable brawler and the stark contrast would have been great. Flair, Sting, Steamboat, Luger, even Dusty could have worked some great stuff with him. If he was ever to go babyface, have him destroy the Freebirds (and Hayes' confederate flag robe).

    ReplyDelete
  115. Ok, people are morons, I understand that, but them being moronic doesn't mean something is hard.

    ReplyDelete
  116. Charismatic eNegro Jef VinsonAugust 1, 2014 at 8:22 AM

    Do you have enough aluminum foil?

    ReplyDelete
  117. This sounds like a perfect reason to burn Atlanta again. That city is a nightmare to drive. We're going to keep burning it until they get it right.

    ReplyDelete
  118. lol yep. "I'm a tech savvy, so I know all of this? why are they bothering ME with this?"

    ReplyDelete
  119. That is part of their own problem.

    Whoever does their market research needs to be canned

    ReplyDelete
  120. Threadjack: Cracked Article:

    "3 Fan Communities That Hate Their Own Members"

    - Nerd culture topics covered: Comic fans, Gamers, and Indy Music fans. Glaring ommission: wrestling fans!

    http://www.cracked.com/blog/3-fan-communities-that-hate-their-own-members/

    ReplyDelete
  121. Hard is relative..




    THAT"S WHAT SHE SAID

    ReplyDelete
  122. Be right back.......

    ReplyDelete
  123. ...'cause my hat is foil lined...

    ReplyDelete
  124. Charismatic eNegro Jef VinsonAugust 1, 2014 at 8:23 AM

    It doesn't help that a majority of the streets have the word "Peach" in it.

    ReplyDelete
  125. This is how it starts huh?

    ReplyDelete
  126. Brie's acting has been pretty terrible, but I'll admit I've been enjoying this feud and the crowd seems to be eating it up. Stephanie has been one of the best heels in wrestling over the past year and it'll be fun to see her get her comeuppance. I think that if done right, this match could actually be a lot of fun. It needs to be overbooked with a ton of run ins, ref bumps, etc... to cover up their lack of in ring ability. Stephanie is so in the zone as a heel right now that I think the crowd heat will be great. Put all that together and I think it might be decent.

    ReplyDelete
  127. What a nightmare that job would be.

    ReplyDelete
  128. Stupid Laurence Fishburne saving his only family and leaving us to die!!

    ReplyDelete
  129. You'd probably have to just lie and tell Vince everything is projected to do great in order to keep the job.

    ReplyDelete
  130. I'd love to see Rusev go over Sheamus at SummerSlam.

    ReplyDelete
  131. The Network is not sustainable. Eventually people will watch (and re-watch) everything they are interested in and find something else to do with the monthly expense. Without a perpetual flow of new content, it will dry up. That's the difference between the WWE Network and Netflix. There is no shortage of new stuff Netflix can keep adding to keep people paying $8/mo. It won't be right away (maybe a couple years?), but eventually I expect a large number of fans to cancel their subscriptions. The "free" special event/PPV thing is nice, but I don't know if it will keep people around.

    ReplyDelete
  132. Well you're right.. especially since he's beating an Irishman..

    ReplyDelete
  133. Rusev vs. Jack Swagger with the US Title on the line is exactly the sort of simple, sensible booking they used to be decent at. I don't even know who the US champ IS at this point

    ReplyDelete
  134. Does anyone here ever read those mark madden articles on wz? They're very short and usually entertaining if completely crap. However he made a great point about Matt hardy and TNA/ROH. There is no reason that those guys should hold dudes under exclusive contracts. Its beneficial to both companies to share talent.

    ReplyDelete
  135. I do agree that the current product is not what is going to sell the Network. It is all about the Archives and, unless they just start pulling blow-away classic PPV/special events out of their asses now, the current stuff is not what is going to drive subscriptions

    ReplyDelete
  136. I think I watched 4 hours of the Network last month as opposed to 30+ the first month. I'm at the point where I have to justify keeping this charge on my credit card.. If they don't add more territory shows, I may not re-up.

    ReplyDelete
  137. They don't even have a good enough product to keep people paying.


    And unless they go all out with their archives, I do to see how people who are disinterested in the current product will keep paying

    ReplyDelete
  138. Is it possible the reason only 150,000 people were buying ppvs isn't because they were tpp expensive but because no one gives a shit?

    ReplyDelete
  139. At least you had some at some point

    ReplyDelete
  140. Yeah, at this point they should be sharing talent back and forth again, but TNA always decides it would rather piss off their partners than contribute anything of note.

    ReplyDelete
  141. Can it be "all of the above"?

    ReplyDelete
  142. My interest in Lana is constantly rising.

    ReplyDelete
  143. Agree.

    Wrestling is in a poor state overall that talent sharing would help out all non-WWE companies

    ReplyDelete
  144. Maybe because they'd be insulted at the fact that someone would rather NOT work at TNA.

    ReplyDelete
  145. I think the PPV/Specials have been pretty strong, and for example, just Cena/Brock II could be worth the price of a regular PPV for a 6 month subscription. (But if i'm not mistaking, SummerSlam is still part of the original 6 months from day 1, right? I would have totally scheduled it to make it over 6 months after the launch date)

    ReplyDelete
  146. Which, if true, would show how far up their own ass their self-awareness is.

    ReplyDelete
  147. Yes, SummerSlam is part of the 6 month commitment.

    But Battleground was a nothing show.

    Personally, I think all PPV's for $9.99 monthly along with the library is a steal but not everyone will think that way.

    The need a consistently good product for people to stay subscribers.

    ReplyDelete
  148. We're the 1% biggest wrestling fans. For a casual fan I wonder if they would even care about seeing every monthly ppv especially when they kind of suck?

    ReplyDelete
  149. I'd say a little of both. Take a show like battleground, which even though I have the network, I haven't watched yet mainly because I didn't give a shit.

    ReplyDelete
  150. That's the thing. They either need to stack the Archives or produce blow-away events (and promote them as "included" in the Network subscription). Or both, ideally

    ReplyDelete
  151. It was a cute bit when HHH was asking for "Jerry" when Steph was arrested. But if he REALLY wanted her out of jail, shouldn't he have asked for Otunga?

    ReplyDelete
  152. Maybe not, but they're hoping fans are like Scott, eating up the archives. At that price, it's really good.

    ReplyDelete
  153. Agree 100%

    To keep casual fans subscribed, they need to put out a really strong product and not reality shows

    ReplyDelete
  154. Or you could half ass both and fire half your employees and cut all expenses

    ReplyDelete
  155. That shows a disconnect with their target demo, IMO.

    ReplyDelete
  156. Exactly. It's more important than ever to have really great PPV/Specials and build new, sustainable stars. Because the appeal of the Archives will not last forever. You can only watch the great shows so many times before that money is better spent on something else.

    ReplyDelete
  157. See, that's exactly what I think will happen on a mass scale. Having ALL that material at your fingertips is a great novelty....for a while. Then you watch Wrestlemania 17, Bash '89, etc a few times and realize that the In Your Houses, ECW ppvs, and most WCW shows pretty much sucked and the novelty wears off.

    ReplyDelete
  158. Charismatic eNegro Jef VinsonAugust 1, 2014 at 8:42 AM

    The porn star daughter?

    ReplyDelete
  159. Again, have the PPV/Specials since the Network launch been *THAT* bad? Some new guys are being elevated, and good matches are being had, even with Daniel's unfortunate injury.

    ReplyDelete
  160. MikeyMike, WitnessAugust 1, 2014 at 8:42 AM

    He comes off like a jackass, but I rarely disagree with Madden when it comes to wrestling. He's a big Matt Hardy fan.
    I also agree with him that Cornette is a jackass. He rips into him more than he ripes into Russo nowadays.

    ReplyDelete
  161. I didn't say they were bad. I said "it's more important than ever to have really great PPV/specials and build new, sustainable stars." They are working on building stars right now and the PPVs this year have not been bad at all.

    ReplyDelete
  162. When I read this story this morning it just struck me as incredibly stupid. Not that we have no interest in our nationals that go abroad, but the risk of bringing a deadly disease to the U.S. is not worth it. It's also hypocritical of the government to tell U.S. citizens not to fly to West Africa due to Ebola and then bring it right back home on the taxpayer dime.

    ReplyDelete
  163. It's a weird dynamic. For the casual modern fan, is the appeal of the Network really having all the Clashes or having Bash '89 at your fingertips? For the older fan, is the current product really enough to keep you subscribing, once you've watched and re-watched all the SNMEs and the relative handful of great PPVs? Marketing to both types of fans is fine, but they have to make sure they deliver for BOTH, or else it's not going to work over the long-term

    ReplyDelete
  164. Why? Neither lawyer knows how to take a bump.

    ReplyDelete
  165. MikeyMike, WitnessAugust 1, 2014 at 8:47 AM

    It's a shame how bad the current WWE product is. There's pretty much a zero percent chance that they will get any more subscribers (at least in a large spike).
    I can't think of a time since I've been a fan where the product has been this born and unexciting.

    ReplyDelete
  166. Which of these if any would drum up more network interest?
    1. An r rated type weekly wrestling show in the vein of the old ECW shows with real music, thong cat fights and f bomb promos
    2. Buying out all the current ongoing indy promotion footage and letting people see like all ROH or dgusa etc on the network
    3.Hiring real filmmakers to make 30 for 30 type documentaries (that Vince isn't allowed anywhere near) that win actual awards are very good
    4. Having that weeks raw available to watch on Tuesday
    5. Making a deal with NBC universal to show archives of a bunch of their TV shows on the network

    ReplyDelete
  167. Both. Even in 2000,when most of their product was awesome, I only bought the shows that seemed *really* great. Even when they were $30/mo that was kind of a lot of money to me and I had to be selective.

    ReplyDelete
  168. Yes because they've only netted 23k since mania. No one wants to see what they are selling right now.

    ReplyDelete
  169. The CDC should be on some uninhabited island somewhere with a nuke or two wired up and ready. Not in a huge city like Atlanta.

    ReplyDelete
  170. I'm actually surprised they got 23k more. That means 23k people chose not to watch WM, and THEN ordered it? Unless they were one of the PPV buys for WM?

    ReplyDelete
  171. Having Raw available on Tuesday would do it for me, but it would have to be good and watchable, or after the first billing period i'm out.


    Using indy footage would be neat, but would never happen. Same with documentaries that aren't spun in a correct way. An "R-rated" show would probably encounter the same problems a regular Raw or Smackdown does. As for the NBC deal, meh.

    ReplyDelete
  172. In reality I have a good chuck of the archive on VHS sitting in boxes in my basement. I keep a working VHS player and standard definition TV down there as well. If I really have the itch to watch that stuff, it is there. I don't *need* the network. I'm not sure why creating a better product and creating a sense of urgency to Raw and the "special events" is such a foreign concept to a company that was once the best in the world at it.

    ReplyDelete
  173. For real. Base this off South Carolina or something, not in one of the major metropolitan cities in the country. I think Obama is going to take a political hit for this.

    ReplyDelete
  174. That's another good point. I'm in the same boat. I haven't subscribed and have no plan to. It's not even monetary either. I could afford it and would enjoy it, but I don't need it. The great matches, promos, angle, etc are all attainable either through YouTube or shit I already own. It's not like this WWE vault of material has been completely inaccessible.

    ReplyDelete
  175. Yeah, there are plenty of locations for it. I never understood having a place like that in a major city, or even in the continental U.S.

    ReplyDelete
  176. Yes, they REALLY think people are going to dig Legends House and such. That's why they sent out that survey a few months back with all those awful reality show ideas (the only good one was Steve Blackman's bounty business).

    ReplyDelete
  177. No.

    I want that Steve Blackman bounty hunter show.

    ReplyDelete
  178. Worst_in_the_WorldAugust 1, 2014 at 8:54 AM

    How hasn't she taken advantage of it? The crowd is popping for her. The segments are hot. Shitty actress or not (and who teh fuck cares? This is wrestling, not American Hustle) her and the angle have worked.

    ReplyDelete
  179. They should have brought him to Pittsburgh, America's Enema.

    ReplyDelete
  180. From the time Nitro started up until about Summer of 2005, Raw and WWE in general was must see TV. I felt a sense of urgency to watch it or I might miss something. I rarely finish a full Raw and fall asleep during special events. I haven't watched Smackdown in years.

    ReplyDelete
  181. They indeed could "future endeavour" the entire Legends House concept, yep. Probably costs a ton of money to produce.

    ReplyDelete
  182. The one thing I don't have a good archive of is Nitro and they haven't put one episode up.

    ReplyDelete
  183. If Vince pulled an ole Anderson and just told all the talent they were getting their pay completely slashed to the lowest possible amount and anyone who didn't like it could fuck off would that exodus of talent/flood of new cheap talent make any difference to the ratings or buyrate? I kind of think the wwe has bottomed out to just about as low it as it could go so why not replace expensive names with cheap nobodies to save cash? Also if Cena, Bryan, Orton etc all left and went elsewhere would it make any ripples at all?

    ReplyDelete
  184. #3 would be interesting. I think WWE should embrace the whole "shoot interview" market and let their guys, especially the retired ones, do honest interviews on the Network. It would bury the shoot interview guys, but maybe WWE should just hire them anyway. It would be hard since they would probably never let it get beyond WWE PR fluff, but I think that's an "original content" avenue worth exploring.

    ReplyDelete
  185. Bringing back Saturday Nights Main Event exclusively for the network.

    ReplyDelete
  186. More cities should have streets that describe their city like that. St. Louis can have Beer St, Beer Ave, Shithole Dr, Beer Blvd, etc.

    ReplyDelete
  187. 1: Nah, not for a while. And who do you use, anyway? Because trying to crossover from PG WWE to this new show would be bad for all involved, IMO.
    2: Interesting, but is the crowd there? Also see: lack of 80's stuff (other than PPVs) on the Network. There's already a large library to add, but more never hurts.
    3: No way in hell does this happen under the WWE umbrella. Unlike ESPN, WWE does have "blood on its hands", although not in the literal sense.
    4: If RAW was "must-see-live", this could work. But RAW in its current state would cannibalize its ratings, as people would just wait to see the "good parts".
    5: Nah, then you might as well call it the Universal Network.

    ReplyDelete
  188. I'm not sure where they would go anyway. Some billionaire would have to want a wrestling promotion and sign everyone

    ReplyDelete
  189. I don't recall him saying anything particularly negative about BNB. Just said that BNB was stiff but other than that he just told stories about how much of a badass (BNB) was. The rib that they played on Karl Moffatt was pretty funny.

    ReplyDelete
  190. Yeah, I think each episode costs like hundreds of thousands for production.

    ReplyDelete
  191. Hard to say - a lot of WWE guys now are marks and would take the pay cut.

    ReplyDelete
  192. Agree, although I lost interest by 2002. It used to be must-see and now I find even the Hulu version to be a chore.

    ReplyDelete
  193. I'm with you. I haven't subscribed yet because they don't have a lot of ECW, AWA, or even Prime Time Wrestling up. If they add that, I'll subscribe out of a curiosity to watch it. There's no one in the current product I'm really dying to see to want "free" pay-per-views.

    ReplyDelete
  194. I'd say there is a pretty good shot that happened this week.

    ReplyDelete
  195. Yeah, I can't even sit through the whole Hulu version of Raw, let alone pay money to see the PPVs. I'm perfectly OK seeing the random blow-away classic match on YouTube a month later or something. I saw Wrestlemania 30 a few weeks after the fact just by googling it (not even any nefarious downloading or anything). It's just not "can't miss" TV anymore and I'm OK with waiting

    ReplyDelete
  196. For #1 you just use the current talent and keep it only on the network. I think this was the original idea behind shotgun Saturday night so its not like they haven't thought about it before

    For #2 I do think theres probably a few thousand fans who like dgusa or ROH etc that don't watch wwe so depending on the price (and if those fans would pay wwe, but they might for easy access to big quality versions of the shows) it could be worth it

    ReplyDelete
  197. Depends - how has morale been in the locker room?

    I figure stuff picked up a bit after the WM payouts, but them complaining about dress code doesn't help.

    ReplyDelete
  198. They quasi had that with Legends Roundtable. They were willing to make that show for 24/7/Classics on Demand, but not the Network? Whatever.

    ReplyDelete
  199. Rusev being the US champion is so perfect and logical that it will never, ever happen.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment