Hey Scott,
Do you think they should leave PPV altogether after SummerSlam and go "all in" with the Network? According to the conference call they're not even considering PPV revenue in 2015 in their projections.
From a personal perspective, absolutely. If they're not counting on getting PPV money anymore, then might as well just commit and be done with it, plus now I'm used to getting the PPVs for free and having them available on-demand. There was never any advantage to me having to pay $60 for the show and then not have a copy for later.
Also, on a related note, the more we learn about this Rogers deal for the Network in Canada, the angrier I get about it. What a bunch of fucking bullshit, as it won't be available west of Ontario (because I GUARANTEE that Bell, for example, isn't going to play ball with Rogers on this because they're more interested in keeping TSN exclusive to THEIR app) and it'll just be the live stream. Shit like this is why I cut the cable in the first place. Especially considering 24/7 cost LESS than this service and was on-demand! FUCK ROGERS CABLE.
The entire second paragraph is like a foreign language to me.
ReplyDeleteYep, I was all in for the Network the moment it hit Canada. I didn't care if it was a dollar or two more than the U.S.. Even at $11.99, it would still be a great deal for what they were offering.
ReplyDeleteNot now, though. All I wanted was the same deal - basically a wrestling stream app like Netflix - that I could load up on, say, my PS3. I didn't want to go through some fucking cable service just to enjoy my wrestling.
So yeah, fuck that and fuck them. I don't know if it's WWE or Rogers to blame, but they just lost an iron-clad guaranteed sale from me.
I can't stand Rogers. It feels like they're constantly shoving their respective dick in my face. Rogers Blue Jays baseball on Rogers Sportsnet live from the Rogers Centre, for example. I'm sure their hockey coverage will be equally as obnoxious.
ReplyDeleteYou wanted: John Cena ending Undertaker's streak to overcome losing to Brock Lesnar.
ReplyDeleteYou got: Brock Lesnar ending Undertaker's streak to overcome losing to John Cena.
To-MAY-to, To-MAH-to.
I feel a little bad for Taker here (first time for everything), as I don't think it would have been nearly such a "shit performance" if he hadn't gotten concussed in the first 5 minutes. It wouldn't have been GREAT, I'm sure, but decent enough probably.
ReplyDeleteIs your ironclad guarantee like big show's ironclad contract?
ReplyDeleteLet's be honest. Nothing is as ironclad as Big Show's contract.
ReplyDeleteLet's just hope they don't buy the Mr. Rogers franchise.
ReplyDeleteNo, I think I liked "BROCK SMASH" better.
ReplyDeleteBut then we wouldn't have had the spectacular Undertaker/CM Punk match.
ReplyDeleteShould roger goddell or roger the alien be their mascot?
ReplyDelete" Shit like this is why I cut the cable in the first place. "
ReplyDeletehttp://getridofcable.net
I'm not an Undertaker fan but if fucking Cena was the one to end the streak, I would be done with wrestling.
ReplyDeleteI thought the same thing
ReplyDelete"This may have been addressed before."
ReplyDeleteThe Blog of Doom, beat a topic of conversation into horsemeat? NEVER!
I think it's time for a Montreal or Chris Walker thread.
ReplyDeleteWell, it IS his birthday.
ReplyDeleteBeat me to it!
ReplyDeleteFast typing comes with the journalism degree.
ReplyDeleteBroadcast journalism?
ReplyDeleteThat is worth 40K for sure
ReplyDeleteI wish...
ReplyDeleteYes, broadcast journalism. That makes sense.
ReplyDeleteWrestlemania 27
ReplyDeleteAnything would have better than Brock ending the streak, the one guy who didn't need it whatsoever. I still can't believe Calloway is such a selfish ass that he'd only job to Brock. Terrible.
ReplyDeleteI have Rogers cable already so I don't care. My love of sports means I'm not cutting any cord anytime soon. With an already-extensive tape library at my fingers, I don't give a shit about on-demand content and will gladly pay much less for every WWE PPV. Plus, I know the streaming isn't going to crap out. That's a plus.
ReplyDeleteBell and Rogers work together constantly. They co-own sports franchises and other properties, for Christ sake.
Either way, the United States might as well get used to this idea as well. If this kind of financial agreement works in Canada, I can guaran-damn-tee you WWE will pursue a similar arrangement with the likes of Comcast or DirecTV. That way, everybody wins.
(Except the fans.)
Personally, I think Cena-Rock II should have been Cena-Punk, because those two would have torn down the house as a WrestleMania main event. And forget Brock-Triple H, just have Brock-Taker happen a year earlier.
ReplyDeleteCena-Undertaker? I can't think of a good time to actually have it. It would have made more sense this year than any other. Maybe replace the third Triple H match in the cell.
Merica
ReplyDeleteCena ending the streak is worse. Much, much worse. Brock winning has given him the extra unstoppableness that is making the build to Cena/Lesnar 2 awesome
ReplyDeleteBrock and Heyman are already making way more of it than Cena would have. Cena, unless used to turn him heel, would have been the absolute worst choice possible. It not only is something he doesn't need even a little bit, it also would have made the anti Cena stuff much worse.
ReplyDeleteIf he was fully selfish, wouldn't he just keep the streak going?
ReplyDeleteI always think, nobody on the planet needed a win over Andre the Giant less than Hogan, the guy who had already been champ for 3 years.
ReplyDeleteThe Mount Rushmore of Cena topics: Cena vs. the streak, Cena turning heel, Cena calling people poopy when it's supposed to be a blood feud, Cena no-selling effects of vicious matches in said blood feuds.
ReplyDeleteAgreed, far worse. It would have hurt Cena much more than it would have helped him.
ReplyDeleteExcept while the states get all the fantastic archival footage, we're stuck with just the 24/7 live stream. That's not what I was excited about for the Network. Not to mention we're hamstrung through Rogers, not an app service that could work on multiple devices like they've been advertising for almost a year.
ReplyDeleteAlso, wasn't the whole "Taker made the decision to lose" thing shot down about 2 seconds after WM ended?
ReplyDeleteThe LAW is saying that WWE's told them it'll have both the live content and the VOD.
ReplyDeleteVince made the decision but he wouldn't have done it unless Taker was cool with it
ReplyDeleteConsidering Cena's popularity with the pre-pubescent set, I'm starting to wonder if WWE creative is made up entirely of 8-10-year-olds.
ReplyDeleteIt's true. Taker is Vince's favourite creation.
ReplyDeleteStill gonna have that Rogers stank all over it.
ReplyDeleteYou're wrong in pretty much every way possible.
ReplyDeleteI hope that's true. Without video-on-demand, it's not worth it for me (assuming my cable provider Eastlink picks it up -- called them this afternoon and no one knew a thing about it, not a good sign).
ReplyDeleteNot to mention that Taker was ready to lose to Orton and Kane at previous Manias.
ReplyDeleteBut in that world we wouldn't have got Punk/Taker and I love that match.
ReplyDeletemore than Shane & Steph?
ReplyDeleteRogers owns FX Canada and Bell is notable for not picking it up, as one example. This would seem to be a similar situation.
ReplyDeleteMan, if it happened this year I wouldn't have, because I was so into the Bryan stuff, but if it happened last year, I might have. It would just reinforce that WWE sees Cena as not only the best ever, but also someone they desperately need to protect.
ReplyDeleteI'm fully expecting Rogers to basically just reinstate what Classics on Demand was, except call it WWE Network. That's really their style.
ReplyDeleteI think Cena-Punk would have blown it away.
ReplyDeleteas long as Living Colour still live-performs Punk to the ring it's all good
ReplyDeleteYes , but "Vince made the decision and Taker agreed to do it" is a far cry from "Taker refused to lose to anyone but Brock".
ReplyDeleteFuck yeah.
ReplyDeleteA Cena Taker streak match would give me a heart attack
ReplyDeleteFor the Main Event of WrestleMania to defend the title against John Cena? Abso-friggin-lutely.
ReplyDeletethat Cena/Punk Raw match they had about a month before Mania was better than Taker vs Punk and every other match on that shitty mania
ReplyDeleteComing again to save the motherfucking day yeah
ReplyDeleteThat's not even remotely a good comparison.
ReplyDeleteIf Vince could get away with it it totally would be. Paying writers in candy cigarettes is a lot less painful to the bottom line.
ReplyDeleteI would have saved that Raw match for the post WM PPV. Pay Punk to stay 1 extra month, and say 'you may have gotten redemption by beating Rock, but you STILL have never beaten me decisively when the WWE title is on the line. " Boom, 5 star match, huge buyrate.
ReplyDeleteNo intelligence, no intensity and no integrity.
ReplyDeleteThat's great in theory (and world's better than that awful Cena/Ryback feud), but Punk was really banged up after mania. Remember that flying elbow that didn't break the table? Punk was limping bad the rest of the match.
ReplyDeleteIt's still hamstrung with Rogers, not the Netflix-like app available on most devices like down in the states.
ReplyDeleteYep, maybe work a 1 month deal where he just has to cut promos for Raw, but doesn't have to wrestle any matches until that one PPV. But oh well, what's done is done.
ReplyDeleteOnly if Cena turned heel in the process.
ReplyDeleteNo way, Brock's the man.
ReplyDeleteI would have kept the title on Punk til Mania, let Cena beat him for it in the main event. Then he can cut a scathing promo walking off the show.
ReplyDeleteWhat a crappy candle.
ReplyDeleteThing is, I was perfectly fine with the (albeit predictable) WM card. And the buyrate was over 1 million, so who are we to argue? My only problem was them giving a huge PPV match on Raw. But hey, we got a great free match, and it's not my money that was Caliber'd.
ReplyDeleteSounds like you've been getting a good Rogering by the cable company for a while.
ReplyDeletehttp://db2.stb.s-msn.com/i/9B/1C2986DB5621C9E3BE48D0B4427B_h416_w622_m2_q80_chlNasCSo.jpg
i keep hearing that. why? Did Hogan turn heel when he ended Andre's fictional 15 year undefeated streak?
ReplyDeletewe argue b/c there was no creativity in that mania card
ReplyDeleteWell I constantly hear on here that WWE can't plan long term. And when they do (the top 3 matches were pretty much set in stone for several months), then they get bashed for being predictable. But if they make a few changes to their plans, like the Daniel Bryan/Batista thing at WM, then they can't stick to a plan. WWE can never win sometimes. (note: We're all happy that they DID change WM 30, but i still hear the complaints that it wasn't the plan all along)
ReplyDeleteOops, I still had Cena/Taker in mind. I retract that.
ReplyDelete(proof that i'm... *GASP* actually not perfect!! *gasp gasp gasp*
Maybe not a bad idea for Wrestlemania 29 to have booked Punk/Cena for the title and then have Undertaker defend the Streak against the Rock. Those are two huge matches.
ReplyDeleteCena isn't Hulk Hogan. He's never, ever been close to Hogan in his prime.
ReplyDeletePredictability isn't the problem. As I said, no creativity in the WM29 matches.
ReplyDeleteRock vs Cena wasn't a feud that year. They worked an angle the year before, Rock won. Cena claims to have a terrible year that wasn't remotely terrible. Now they're headed to Mania. Cena doesn't seem extra driven to beat Rock, or vice versa. No new wrinkles added to the feud....it's a full year of act 2.
Punk vs Undertaker was only about "hey your manager died" nothing else--that is not a story.
Probably.
ReplyDeleteScott, how would you rebook the invasion?
ReplyDeleteUndertaker is a face, and Andre had just turned heel.
ReplyDeleteAnd was the biggest heel in wrestling...going against the biggest face in wrestling.
ReplyDeleteSorry if this was said below, but for me it was all the way back at Wrestlemania 27. We still keep our Taker/HBK series, we avoid Miz saying he main events a Mania, and we give that show the amazing main event that it so sorely needed to land it in firmly good territory.
ReplyDeleteThat's really good. If Miz must be champ he could've defended against Morrison, like many people wanted at the time
ReplyDeleteOR Daniel Bryan!
ReplyDeleteIn retrospect, yeah, it should have been last year when Taker could still work a match, but without that kind of knowledge - it should have been this year. COME ON, it's the big round number, WM30, what better time to do that?
ReplyDeleteAnd really, what was with Cena/Bray? THAT was the best they could do for their biggest star on the biggest show ever? THAT was the best they could think of in terms of getting people to sign-up for the Network?
I think Vince really, REALLY overestimated Batista's return.
at the time I thought Bray was gonna win (go ahead; laugh), now in retrospect it did absolutely nothing for Bray.
ReplyDeleteConsidering Punk and Cena had a ****3/4 on Raw right before Mania, if they had done a match together at Mania instead it would have been amazing.
ReplyDeleteDitto here. I'm very doubtful.
ReplyDeleteIt completely stunted brays character development.
ReplyDeleteI don't think he was necessarily wrong to expect big things from Batista; he left when he was doing his great douchebag heel character, and everyone had fond memories of him. Now, when you add the Bryan Revolution and the fact Big Dave came back sucking wind, that's where it went downhill.
ReplyDeleteBut I thought it was going to be big, at first too.
TSN=Canadian ESPN for those confused.
ReplyDeleteWe also call it sportscentre, not sportscenter.
You're welcome
Taker vs Cena or gtfo
ReplyDelete/farva
I'm out. I don't know how Shaw Cable will handle this and honestly i no longer care.
ReplyDeleteWon't even consider paying for this shit now, i'll just continue to watch illegal streams and ignore the company when they do their usual yearly houseshows like i've done for the past several years.
Don't want my money Vince? Good! Go fuck yourself, i hope the network subs fall to under 500K by the end of the year & we go back to 1994/95 levels of shit business.
How about never?
ReplyDeleteNo, really.
If it happened, Cena would have to be champ. Without that, you can call the finish a mile away: AA reversed into tombstone, pinfall. The appeal of that match is that Cena as champ can't lose the belt to a guy who wrestles once a year (obligatory "Lesnar lol"), but Taker can't lose to the guy the WWE still thinks they can get crowds to cheer for.
There's no way to book a finish to that match that'll make anyone happy, which is probably why they never did it.
It's basically ruined the Wyatts. Bray Wyatt never got boring chants before that program.
ReplyDeleteIt should have happened at 27. Rock costs Cena the match, setting up the 28 match.
ReplyDeleteTotally agree.
ReplyDeleteWrestlemania 30 could have been:
ReplyDelete- Undertaker vs. Cena
- Lesnar vs. Punk
- Bryan vs. HHH
. . .just like guys like Farva, myself, and others were rambling about since late last year. Throw in Wyatts vs. Shield, Orton vs. Batista as well.
To be fair, I've had terrible experiences with Bell too.
ReplyDeleteYep. Miz vs. Morrison could have taken its place
ReplyDeleteI agree. I think Rock vs. HHH one last time would have been fine too. After Rock loses to Punk in his last pursuit of the WWE title (Rumble '13), he's ready to say goodbye....but HHH challenges his arch nemesis for one more match. Total "special attraction" but gives both veterans something to do without taking away from the full-time guys. Do Punk-Cena 'Ironman' or something as the ultimate closure of their feud
ReplyDeleteCena vs. Punk, Ironman (or something suitably epic)
ReplyDeleteRock vs. HHH (one last time)
Taker vs. Brock (a year earlier)
Wrestlemania 27:
ReplyDelete- John Cena vs. The Undertaker (give Cena a year-long reign headed into it)
Wrestlemania 28:
- John Cena vs. The Rock
- The Undertaker vs. Triple H (2nd time, rather than 3rd in this scenario)
Wrestlemania 29:
- John Cena vs. CM Punk, IronMan
- Brock Lesnar vs. The Undertaker
- Triple H vs. The Rock
Hasn't this effectively already happened?
ReplyDeleteDude, they JUST announced the deal, and EastLink probably haven't even begun negotiations with Rogers yet. Give it a couple days/weeks. Cable TV deals don't exactly move at the speed of light.
ReplyDeleteThat would have been a good idea, better than jobbing to Miz.
ReplyDeleteRIP.
ReplyDeleteWould have been a nice stacked card.
ReplyDeleteAnyone not on Rogers needs to chill for a couple days/weeks to let the legal process go through to determine if they get it. I guarantee Shaw or Cogeco or Sasktel did not pick up the phone and call Rogers as soon as PWI reported the deal and be all "OH MA GERD!! WE NEED WWE NETWORK!! TAKE OUR MONEY NOW!!"
ReplyDeleteLet all the business/political BS take care of itself, and I'm sure there will be more than just Rogers with WWE Network. Although... I wouldn't hold my breath if you're on Shaw or Bell.
And they wonder why they can't push new talent.
ReplyDeleteYeah, they did have a decent match on Raw earlier in the year.
ReplyDeleteWould have saved the show.
ReplyDeleteThen punk could have disappeared front the company.
ReplyDeleteHe could then leave for how long again and it would fit his character.
ReplyDeleteAnd Punk had to win a match to face the Undertaker.
ReplyDeleteThat was a good one.
ReplyDeleteTo me, that's what would have made the match so fascinating and so much fun. Once they went into the whole WWE "Let me kick out of your finisher, right after you kick out of mine," routine, the crowd would have gone insane.
ReplyDeleteWhy wouldn't it be like the Disney etc. AppleTV apps are in the States, where you have to login through your cable provider and then boom you're good?
ReplyDeleteOther than Cena, Brock actually makes the most sense. I'm just thankful to whatever "higher power" there is that "Mr. Fragile Ego" HHH wasn't the one to do it, though to be fair, he DID have to be the one who walked away from his match with Taker, while the Deadman had to be carted to the back, thus making himself appear greater than Taker in just about every way possible.
ReplyDeleteMore than Shane, almost definitely. After all, he got the son he REALLY always wanted when Steph married HHH.
ReplyDeleteNever doing Cena vs Taker as a mania main event is just mind blowing. There has to be something behind the scenes of why they never pulled the trigger on it. I mean they really can't be that stupid.
ReplyDeleteIn Punk's world, and I agree, Punk should have been in Miz's spot.
ReplyDeleteIt was one of the last true main events they had.
ReplyDeleteI was never that impressed with Rocks return either. At least Cena was nice enough to carry him.
ReplyDeleteYeah I said it.
Okay, I have to know who on here attacked WWE for not sticking to the plan of Batista/Orton. Who was it?
ReplyDeleteThey always made magic together.
ReplyDeleteI never had a huge problem with Rock/Cena II other than Rock clearly out of wrestling shape and not ending the match how it should have ended. Rock kips up like the year before to catch him in the Rock bottom only Cena has learned from his mistake the year before, stops himself, and gets Rock to charge into a AA. Storyline wise it would have made sense as Cena had been going on about that being his big mistake.
ReplyDeleteI guess in my world you do Cena beating the streak, and then the following year doing Cena/Rock II with a more in ring shape Rock and a better finish.
Yeah. If Punk still leaves (instead of getting his win back over Lesnar), then audible to Brock vs. Batista.
ReplyDeleteWell, with all the cuts, they now allegedly only need like 500k subs to make a profit.
ReplyDeleteBecause it was so much cleaner and less complicated by doing it like Netflix.
ReplyDeletePetulant child
ReplyDeleteOh shit you know his real name
ReplyDeleteNo because dropping PPV entirely is an incredible short-sighted, bone-headed, ill conceived thing to do in which the company would essentially be throwing away (increasingly smaller, admittedly) amounts of money by cutting non-Network subscribers out. Trust me, there are people unwilling to change. There are people who will pay $55 for a PPV that they know how to order but will balk at $20 for a month of the Network that they don't know how to use. There are people you'll be cutting out who are unable to even GET the Network, people who live in areas without good enough internet speeds to stream the shows, and people who live in countries where it isn't or won't be available.
ReplyDeleteI mean yeah, WWE has done an excellent job of killing PPV as a cash cow for themselves thus far, but it would be ludicrous to go even deeper with it after the catastrophic attempts of getting the Network up and running. Do they have to go all-in on the Network? On the surface of things, yes, but when it's been SUCH a disaster, how can they justify to themselves and to their shareholders about getting in any deeper?
Oh, I was excited for his return too, as his heel run was fantastic. Which is why it was so confusing that they brought him back as a face.
ReplyDeletePlus, as much as people may have been looking forward to his return, nobody was looking for him to *replace* Bryan as the spotlighted act. Bringing him back could have been a good thing, but not at the expense of their most popular act.
Totally agree.
ReplyDeleteI was 100% convinced that they'd go the Raven/Foley/Austin route, and have Bray "pass out from the pain" while locked in the STF.
ReplyDeleteTHAT would have been an amazing layer to add to the character.
They started teasing it at one point. I remember a match between DX, JeriShow, and Cena/Taker on a special Raw that ended with Taker tombstoning Cena.
ReplyDeleteThe network is supposed to roll out in Canada in 12 days and Viewers Choice is shutting down Sept. 30. Hopefully they'll move faster than that.
ReplyDeleteRogers will. But I deal with EastLink at work and they are not the quickest folks when it comes to getting contracts pushed through.
ReplyDeleteThis is the first time in my life I've ever really been glad not to be Canadian.
ReplyDeletesame for Punk.
ReplyDeleteif Rock had been put with less talented (or: less motivated) workers he would have been exposed even worse than he already was.
also, so often suggested: Cena vs. Taker "I Quit" match.
ReplyDeletethe most unpredictable main event match ever because both guys are presented as workers that NEVER submit.
(yes, I know that Taker has lost once or so. but that's once in forever)
Punk vs. Taker feels similar to Batista vs. Taker to me.
ReplyDelete(= the guys seemingly trying everything to steal the show and make their match the best of the night)
I don't know if I like that one as much others because you would lose the near falls.
ReplyDeleteAll I know about TSN is Michael Landsberg.
ReplyDeleteThe Disney/etc apps are pretty much done like Netflix, only with an extra subscriber login. Is there anything I'm missing?
ReplyDeleteMy memory isn't what it used to be, but didn't Cena score a pin on Taker during a tag match at NWO 2007? I'd have thought for sure then that that would have led to Cena/Taker at that years mania.
ReplyDelete