Skip to main content

Six Million Pageview Request: King Lear

(2012 Scott sez:  As requested by Steve Sindar, who got the six millionth pageview on the blog, here’s another look at what is probably my most popular and famous essay, originally written in 1999 for Wrestleline.) 

King Lear (The Fall of the WWF)

I was never good at this sort of thing in high school.

I read King Lear in Grade 12, and was quite impressed with it. It was very dark and cynical, and as a cynic myself I could appreciate that. But the whole "understanding Shakespeare" thing always went over my head. I'm a very superficial person at heart, and I dislike symbolism and allegories and boring stuff like that. It was meant as entertainment, says I, so entertain me.  (Probably why I’m a lifelong fan of pro wrestling, come to think of it.  I also hated poetry and couldn’t write it to save my life.) 

Despite that shortcoming, I still managed to turn in a critical essay of King Lear that earned me 100% on the provincial diploma exam for English and impressed the hell out of a bunch of teachers. (The “dips” as we called them are kind of a non-binding Canadian version of the SATs, but subject-specific and without the life-altering nature.  Basically if you want to attend Canadian university and you have the money and an 80% high school average, you’re good to go. The mania about getting into the right schools in the US always mystified me growing up because none of it applies up here.)  But being the person that I am, I quickly forgot about the subject matter and filed the play away in the endless Rolodex of useless knowledge that is my brain.  (I wish I had kept more of my stuff from high school, actually.  Now that I have a daughter who is only 2 and already loves books, I feel like it’s my responsibility to make sure to foster that as much as possible.) 

Skip ahead more than a few years, to late 1997. As a side project for my spare time, I decide to write a big epic work on the Monday Night Wars and what led to them. (Also toyed with doing a book on the subject for a while too, much later on of course.)  While writing the WWF part of things, it struck me how closely Vince McMahon resembled the tragic figure of King Lear, although the ending to HIS story was certainly anything but tragic.

For those who haven't read King Lear, here's a summary of what happens:

King Lear is a once-wise, aging ruler of a large kingdom who is in need of an heir. He summons his three daughters to him and decides that whichever one loves him most will be given his kingdom. Regan and Goneril lie and profess their love with various hyperbole, while Cordelia simply states her loyalty to him and no more. Lear loses control and punishes Cordelia for her answer, denying her the kingdom and giving it to his other, more "loving" daughters instead. As Lear moves away from his ruling duties, he is shuttled back and forth between his two daughters, both of whom are using him for their own gains. Soon Lear's only true friend is the fool, who ironically is the only one who speaks the truth. Cordelia is courted by the King of France, who soon invades the weakened Lear, nearly costing Lear his entire kingdom. The invasion is barely held back by Lear's army, and as his other daughters desert the kingdom, Lear reconciles with Cordelia and finally realizes who his true allies are, only to discover that it's too late...Cordelia has been mortally wounded by the battle, and Lear has gone so mad that he is unable to see that, and thinking that she is still alive and able to rule his kingdom, he gives up and dies.

Rather gloomy little play, isn't it? So what does that have to do with the WWF? Well, let's re-write it, substituting some names...

Vince McMahon is a once-wise, aging promoter of a large wrestling company, who is in need of a new long-term draw. He summons his three biggest names to him and decides that whichever one kisses the most ass will be given a run as champion. Diesel and Shawn Michaels lie and profess their respect for Vince with various hyperbole, while Bret Hart simply states his loyalty to him and no more. Vince loses control and punishes Bret for his answer, jobbing him to Bob Backlund and giving the WWF title to Diesel instead. As Vince moves away from his creative duties, he is manipulated back and forth between his two champions, both of whom are using him for their own gains. Soon Vince's only true ally is Jim Ross, who ironically is the only one who speaks the truth. Bret Hart is courted by Eric Bischoff, who soon invades the weakened Vince, nearly costing him the WWF. The invasion is barely held back by Vince's loyalist workers, and as the Clique deserts the WWF, Vince reconciles with Bret Hart and signs him to a 20 year deal, only to discover that it's too late...Bret has been morally scarred by the changing face of wrestling, and Vince has gone so mad that he is unable to see that, and thinking that Bret is still a viable draw and able to carry the WWF title whenever the need should arise, he gives up and instead allows Shawn Michaels an extended reign as champion, thus effectively conceding defeat in the Monday Night Wars.  (Also note years later that Vince really is losing his mind compared to his younger days, and pretty much kicked heir apparent Shane McMahon out of his “kingdom” and replaced him with HHH instead.) 

Heavy, no?

So this, then, is why the WWF died, and how they got there...

THE STORY

Part One: Vince McMahon 1, Federal Government 0.

The first player in our little tragedy is a guy you've probably never heard of, but who single-handedly changed the WWF nonetheless: Dr. George Zahorian. (I think we’ve all heard of George by now.)  See, from the mid-80s until the early 90s, steroids were legal for use in the US as long as they were prescribed by a doctor. So Vince McMahon simply hired himself a doctor, under the pretext of having them there on behalf of the state athletic commission, and away he went distributing the juice to any WWF wrestler who had the cash. And even if they didn't have the cash, no problem, he'd just advance them some money on their next paycheque.

Problem: In 1991, Dr. George Zahorian is sent down the river by the government, and arrested on several charges of distributing steroids. Suddenly, the WWF is *very* nervous, and rightly so. Just as they feared, upon his arrest Zahorian squeals to the feds that Vince McMahon has been using and distributing steroids himself for years, and now the government has a solid and tangible way to nail McMahon on felony charges, something they'd been waiting to do for years.

And so, on Friday, November 19, 1993, the Brooklyn, NY office of the U.S. Department of Justice handed down an indictment against Vince McMahon and Titan Sports Inc. The indictment contained charges of conspiracy, possession and possession with intent to distribute. Vince was, in a word, screwed.  (Really, in retrospect he had little to worry about, because the government’s case was ridiculously circumstantial and was based on accusations in one part of the country while WWF was very publicly running shows in another part of the country entirely, thus giving Vince an airtight alibi.  But we certainly didn’t know that at the time.  The courtroom transcripts are really fascinating stuff if you ever have a few years of your life to burn.) 

The effect on the WWF was immediately noticeable. Pat Patterson took over most of the major creative endeavours in Vince's absence, and the result was Royal Rumble 94, a card featuring 10 guys teaming up to put the Undertaker in a casket, and Undertaker subsequently rising to the ceiling after delivering a soliloquy. It was widely considered one of the stupidest things ever seen in wrestling. (Some people, ON THIS VERY SITE IN FACT, have since started defending it.  No accounting for taste, I guess.)  Ridiculous gimmick wrestlers like Doink the Clown and Men on a Mission were pushed down the fans' throats, and the overall quality of Monday Night RAW declined at an alarming pace.

One of the bright spots of the early 1994 period was the feud between the Hart Brothers -- Bret and Owen. Vince was all for transitioning the WWF title from Undertaker to Ludvig Borga, who would then lose it to Lex Luger at Wrestlemania X while Bret fought his brother in the undercard. (This has of course been debunked several times since then and likely came from Tony Halme himself.)  However, when a tied result of the Rumble was booked, with Bret and Lex both hitting the floor at the same time (although sharp-eyed fans pointed out that Lex clearly hit first), the crowd so decisively voiced their approval for Bret that the WWF had no choice but to drastically alter plans.  (I wouldn’t say “drastically alter.”  By that time they pretty much knew they were going with Bret as the top guy.)  Bret was given the title in the main event, Luger was buried. Owen was subsequently pushed into the main event as a foil for Bret. It was the first real sign that the WWF was willing to change with the times. That proved to be premature hope.

On July 22, 1994, after deliberating for 16 hours, the jury found McMahon and Titan Sports not guilty of the charges. Despite testimony from Zahorian and Hulk Hogan, there proved to be too many flaws in the evidence, holes in the stories, and reluctance from wrestlers to testify and thus be branded a traitor in the locker room, and Vince was a free man. And with the Dark Period looking to be over, Vince triumphantly returned as the creative force behind the WWF.

The first major storyline to emerge after this was the Fake Undertaker one. Ted Dibiase had "found" the Undertaker (after he "died" at the Rumble, remember), only it was SMW mainstay Brian Lee with his hair dyed red. (Not to mention one of Mark Callaway’s best friends in real life.)  The "real" Undertaker returned soon after the imposter debuted (in reality he was on vacation with his wife) and a match was set for Summerslam 94 with little buildup or interest from the fans. The real Undertaker won the match, Brian Lee disappeared, and Undertaker went back to his usual act again, a state in which he'd remain until 1996.

Meanwhile, another interesting thing occurred: WWF veteran Bob Backlund was given a title match against Bret Hart on WWF TV, and lost. At the end of the match, Backlund snapped and attacked Hart, then stared at his hands in awe. The original idea was possession by the returning Papa Shango, but to everyone's surprise, Backlund managed to get himself over as a monster heel using only the "crazy old man" gimmick and his largely untested heel interview skills. The fans were hugely into the character, so he was pushed into the main event with Bret Hart at Survivor Series 94...and won the title. Backlund was the most interesting heel champion they'd had in years, and was hugely over. Best of all, he was still a great wrestler at 41, an age that seems downright young compared to the people on top of WCW these days. So what happened?

The Clique happened. And nothing would ever be the same again. (Sorry if this is getting a little too “Behind The Music” for everyone.  I was really into that show at this point.) 

Part Two: The Clique

(I was also into sub-headings.)  Let's backtrack a bit.

In 1993, Shawn Michaels hit his stride as a singles wrestler, winning the Intercontinental title for a second time from ex-partner Marty Jannetty. In order to give the character the last ingredient lacking, the WWF decided to give him a bodyguard. So, as a favor to WWF star Razor Ramon, WCW jobber (and good friend of Ramon) Vinnie Vegas was hired and repackaged as the monster Diesel. The three men became friends and started working together on a regular basis. Around the same time, independent wrestler The Lightning Kid was brought in and repackaged as hard-luck underdog The 1-2-3 Kid, getting his first win by going over...you guessed it...(Frank Stallone?) Razor Ramon. He soon joined their little group. A contract dispute with the WWF left Shawn out of action in late 93 and Diesel out of luck, but by the end of the year Shawn was back and Diesel was tossing out 8 straight wrestlers in Royal Rumble 94 to win over the crowd. (That was a pretty awesome moment for him.)  Ramon was Intercontinental champion, and set up an issue with Shawn Michaels over who was the "real" champ that led to the show-stealing ladder match at Wrestlemania X.  (I’m kind of omitting Shawn’s drug suspension here, which TO THIS DAY he claims was a setup to smear his good name, which was the reason behind switching the title to Ramon in the first place.  Because if you’re looking for someone dependable and drug-free, think Scott Hall.) 

Now they were using each other to get more over, and the push escalated. Diesel and Shawn were given the tag titles shortly before Summerslam, while Ramon and the Kid were positioned as buddies. The four men had a ****1/2 tag team match with each other on an early episode of WWF Action Zone that only served to demonstrate how good they could be together and how lazy they tended to get otherwise. (Look it up on YouTube!  It’s AWESOME!  It’s not on DVD and it totally should be.)  The booking was starting to center almost exclusively on those four, and as a result they were the only ones getting enough airtime to be significantly over. (That’s what the kids call a “self-fulfilling prophecy.”) And so, at Survivor Series 94, Diesel and Shawn finally split up in order to begin the parallel singles pushes of both men. And mere days later, with almost no warning, Bob Backlund made his first title defense against Diesel after beating Bret Hart in a gruelling 40 minute marathon. Diesel won the match against Backlund in 6 seconds with a kick to the gut and a powerbomb, taking the title and kicking off the wretched "New WWF Generation" era.  (He was like Hulk Hogan, but with less moves and better hair.) 

Suddenly, the entire direction of the promotion shifted to Shawn Michaels v. Diesel. Shawn was put over several bigger men in order to build him as a viable contender. (Specifically he beat Adam Bomb clean with the superkick to not only show he could beat a bigger guy, but to establish that as his finisher once and for all.)  He won the 95 Royal Rumble and faced Diesel for the title at WrestleMania XI...and that was the first sign of a major problem for Vince McMahon, and the first sign that he was unwilling to change with the times.

Part Three: Vince <heart> Big Talentless Slugs

For you see, the WWF had now done the impossible and made Shawn Michaels MORE over than Diesel. (What, someone more over than Kevin Nash?  That’s unpossible!)  It was undeniable. For the first time in his experience since the Hulk Hogan era, the fans were actively demanding that a smaller man be given the World title push at top of the promotion, and Vince didn't know how to deal with it. He jobbed Shawn to Diesel at Wrestlemania, which only served to make him more over than he was before. (I don’t think as the heel champion in 95 would have worked particularly well anyway.)  He gave Shawn a new bodyguard -- Sid Vicious -- and then had him turn on Shawn, hoping the babyface push would steer the fans toward a Sid-Diesel showdown instead. It didn't work -- the fans clearly wanted Shawn v. Diesel again, and the WWF was unwilling to provide that for whatever reason. Instead they provided Diesel v. Sid, Diesel v. Mabel, Diesel v. Yokozuna, trying everything in their power to build Diesel as a Hogan-like babyface to recapture lightning in a bottle.  (Story of their life.) 

The ultimate example of this is King of the Ring 95, one of the most depressingly bad cards ever put together by either promotion. The point of it was to make the fans fear Mabel as a legitimate title threat, but what the arena was screaming for was Shawn, and by the time Mabel defeated Savio Vega in the finals the crowd was so deflated that none of them could possibly have gone home happy. Meanwhile, the Diesel v. Sid program dragged on, playing to houses of 1000 people or less much of the time. (Yeah, even up here in wrestling-crazed Western Canada, they went from arenas to large halls.  It was pretty sad.)  And when the focus was shifted to Diesel v. King Mabel and set up as the main event for Summerslam, the groans of pain from the fanbase were almost audible. Matches like Michaels v. Ramon in a ladder rematch and Kid v. Hakushi were blowing the roof off the arena, while fans snored through Diesel v. Mabel or Undertaker v. whoever. The old formula of building up a big fat heel to lose to the virtuous champion was dying fast, but that didn't stop the WWF from beating it into the ground all of 1995 and 1996, once Shawn got his run at the top. In Shawn's case, he got fed to Vader and a heel-turned Diesel. Vince's fascination with big men had killed the house show circuit so much and left Monday Night RAW such a pathetic shell of it's former self that the WWF was now almost begging for a challenge to it's throne.

In a word, Nitro.

Part Four: "He beats the big guy with three superkicks"

With those eight words, the Monday Night Wars were officially launched, and WCW had the lead. In the early days of Nitro, Eric Bischoff counter-programmed everything that the WWF did almost to the minute, putting matches at the commercial breaks during the WWF's big matches. And most notably, the first example of Bischoff thinking "outside the box" was to simply give away the results of the very stale taped RAWs during the Nitro broadcast, as RAW was taped four shows at a time once a month. Did it work? That's debatable at best. (82 weeks of ratings dominance say it did.)  But people *did* talk about Nitro now, whether it was good or bad, and that translated into viewers, enough to cause the WWF to take notice.

So what did they do? Refine their approach? Push new stars? Adjust their way of thinking about the wrestling business as a whole?

No, even better...they mocked Ted Turner.  (That’s Vince for you.) 

Yes, in early 1996, an increasingly desperate WWF began an infamous series of sketches called "Billionaire Ted's Rasslin' Warroom", using very slightly changed versions of Ted Turner, Hulk Hogan, Randy Savage and Mean Gene to illustrate how much hipper and with it the WWF was. However, the sketches had two fatal flaws:

1) The WWF was doing the same repetitive nonsense that they were mocking WCW for, (Example:  They ragged on WCW for using shoes and hot coffee over and over, but RAW was filled with screwjob finishes and run-ins just as frequently) and;

2) The sketches ended up becoming so bizarre and mean-spirited that Ted Turner's lawyers issued a cease-and-desist order against the WWF, something which much of the WWF fanbase agreed with.  (It was one thing when they were pointing out logical fallacies in their booking or how old their top stars were, but taking very personal potshots at Ted Turner just left people feeling dirty after watching them.) 

And now, with the failure of the Billionaire Ted sketches, things were falling apart more rapidly than Vince could keep up. Diesel's contract was up and he made it known that he would rather ply his trade in WCW for more money. Razor Ramon was suffering from a severe drug habit and was no longer welcome in the WWF. (Although even with all the rehab troubles it really just came down to money and he probably would have been re-signed if they could.)  The 1-2-3 Kid's attitude was becoming so disruptive that he was also asked to leave. (That’s saying it politely.)  And so, in the ultimate slap in the face to the WWF, the departing Clique members lost their final matches one night in Madison Square Garden, and then engaged in a group hug to close the evening, before departing for WCW the next day.

Vince was enraged, and punished the only available target for his anger: Hunter Hearst Helmsley, who had joined the Clique in mid-95 after coming over from WCW.  (There’s some dispute over whether this “punishment” was a real thing or just urban legend, but HHH himself worked it into his character later on so that’s good enough for me.) 

Now desperate for anything to gain the edge back, he started doing completely the wrong things -- he re-signed the Ultimate Warrior and gave him free reign, he put a major title on Ahmed Johnson, and began pushing has-been Jake "The Snake" Roberts on a nostalgia trip. Goldust's quasi-gay character was stretched to the absolute bounds of good taste, and then hastily turned face for political reasons. (They were getting major, MAJOR heat from gay rights groups over the character as presented.)  Untested Olympic weightlifter Mark Henry was signed to a 10 year deal, and immediately pushed. None of it worked. Nothing. The only bright spot of the bunch was Shawn Michaels carrying everything on two legs to **** matches at every turn, and even that could only go so far because of Vince's reluctance to give a smaller wrestler like Shawn a proper run as champion.

And so finally on Memorial Day, 1996, Scott Hall showed up on the first two-hour edition of Nitro, kicking off the nWo angle, and essentially shovelling the last bit of dirt on the WWF's grave, as WCW grabbed the ratings lead and didn't let go of it until 1998.

The World Wrestling Federation, 1984-1996, RIP.

Now, let's cut open the body and see what the causes of death were...

Part Five: Garbageman By Day, Wrestler By Night.

If you could boil Vince's major problems (and there were lots) down to one simple reason, it is this: Gimmicks sell t-shirts, characters sell tickets. (That’s the one lesson that Vince Russo actually learned and put to good use.)  Vince's inability to make that distinction cost him dearly as fans became smarter and expected a different product as a result.

See, the problem was Hulk Hogan. For years before the big crash, Vince could just stick some guy out there with a dumb gimmick, put him against Hogan, and the fans would have a reason to hate them right there. He's fighting Hulk! Boooo! Easy, right?  (Yup.  Sounds simple, but it worked for FOUR YEARS.) 

Well, now Hogan was gone and fans needed another reason to care. Want an example of what I mean? Take Bob Holly, for instance. When he started in the WWF, he was called "Sparky" Thurman Plugg, which is a semi-clever play on "STP" and "spark plug". Hah hah, right? But just looking at that gimmick, do you cheer him or boo him? And why?  (You boo him because he’s a dick, although we didn’t know how much of one at that point.) 

It was that "why" that really got to the fans. Because Vince would just keep sticking guys out there with silly names and silly costumes and pretty soon no one cared anymore. Vince produced the evil martial artist Kwang, who didn't get a reaction because he didn't do anything particularly evil. So he repackaged him as the good Caribbean legend Savio Vega, and again he didn't get much of a reaction because he didn't do anything particularly good. Vince, ironically, was the last to "get it". The fans were asking "Why should we boo a plumber? Why should we cheer a garbageman? Why should even bother to care one way or another about Jerry Lawler's evil dentist?" The WWF's answer was basically "Because we told you so" and that's where it all went bad. (Doesn’t THAT sound familiar?)  Because now they had to TELL the fans what they wanted to see, when in fact the fans were already telling the WWF what they wanted, and it was Shawn bumping like a madman for Razor Ramon, or Bret Hart going 30 minutes with his brother, or Mankind and Undertaker beating on each other in a boiler room. The fans didn't care about the backstory for Mankind (he was a prize-winning piano prodigy as a child, but he never met the lofty expectations of his upper-class parents, and one day his mother slammed the lid shut on his fingers and sent him to live in the sewers and be raised by rats...just in case you were wondering), they cared because he was a dominant heel, and oh my god did he just BEAT THE UNDERTAKER?

The people knew who they cared about all along -- it was those who had characters they could relate to, or personalities they could connect with. It didn't matter what color the tights were or what profession they held (and why would someone as well-paid as a plumber bother with wrestling, anyway?) outside of wrestling, it was the wrestler that counted. That's why Sunny got over and the Bodydonnas are a footnote of history, and that's why the Goon was doomed to only doing a couple of RAW tapings before getting shuffled out of wrestling history. And most tellingly, that's why fans at the 1996 Slammy Awards chanted "Kill the Clown" when Vince had Doink make an unscheduled (and unwelcome) appearance during the course of the show.

But most telling and sad of all is the treatment endured by the WWF's brightest star during this whole period, and the one who could have saved them all along...

Part Six: This Week On RAW: Bret Hart v. Barry Horowitz!

No, not Barry Horowitz.

Following Bret's loss to Bob Backlund in 1994, he was almost immediately de-pushed into the mid-card at the request of the Clique, who didn't want their heat to be reduced via Bret. And so Bret got to face Backlund in a boring rematch at the biggest show of the year, Wrestlemania XI. Then he got to put over newcomer Hakushi and Jerry Lawler. Then he got to have "Kiss My Foot" matches with Lawler. Then he got to wrestle Lawler's evil dentist Isaac Yankem in his first match at the second biggest card of the year, Summerslam. Then it was off to a feud with the evil pirate Jean-Pierre LaFitte. Man, can't you just FEEL the excitement Bret must have had all year with that lineup?  (An unmotivated Bret is not a pretty sight.) 

Thankfully, Vince came to his senses in late 1995 and decided that Diesel was doing his company more harm than good, and jobbed him to Bret Hart at Survivor Series 95 to end the Clique Era once and for all. Bret ended up being a transitional champion to Shawn Michaels, a situation which enraged him so much that he ended up taking 6 months off and nearly jumped to WCW in the process as the famed "third man" for the nWo. (That is not correct.  Bret was never even considered for it.) 

Hindsight says that Bret probably should have left when he had the chance in 1996. (Well, Owen for sure.)  The two obvious questions, "Why was he treated so badly?" and "Why did he then stay?" are harder to deal with, but both answers, whatever they may be, speak volumes about Bret's loyalty to the sport in general and to Vince McMahon specifically.

When Bret finally returned in the fall of 1996, with the WWF far behind WCW in the war, he was put into a program with upstart WWF newcomer Steve Austin, and then, finally, Vince McMahon made the decision to start listening to the fans, one that would slowly but surely swing the balance the other way and cause the WWF to rise from the grave like Lazarus and wreak vengeance on those who put it there.

But that's another rant.

Part Seven: Checkmate.

The death was slow and painful -- from mid-1996 until early 1998, the WWF was essentially a zombie, a walking corpse that no one had noticed was dead yet. It took a total cleansing of the heel-babyface system, the gimmick system, the lockerroom, and a reinvention of what weekly episodic TV (ROYALTIES!  I FUCKING WANT ROYALTIES!)  was with regards to wrestling in order for the WWF to return to it's former glory. Had ECW not been around to provide a template, it's sketchy at best as to whether or not Vince would have known how to go about recreating himself and his promotion, and it's even sketchier whether the WWF fanbase would have been receptive to those changes. In fact, given how close to total bankruptcy the WWF was at the point where Diesel lost his title to Bret Hart, it's sketchy as to whether they could have even survived another year.  (I still think Vince overstates his own financial woes around that time in order to make himself look like the poor underdog against big bad Turner.) 

But with wrestling, as with the stories crafted for it and upon which they are based, it is often darkest before the dawn for the protagonist and there is usually much soul-searching and spiritual realizations to go through before redemption can be found.

I'm sure Shakespeare would agree. In fact, he'd probably be watching RAW, too, and wearing an Austin 3:16 t-shirt...

Comments

  1. I once wrote a term paper comparing Shakespeare performances at the Globe to pro wrestling now. Thank God I wrote back when the WWE was good.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I can't find the Action Zone match that you mentioned, and you really have me wanting to see it. Has anyone here found it?

    Anyway, it was a pleasure reading this again, especially with the Scott Sez material thrown in... especially the part about an awesome Kliq match that I can't find, fucko!

    ReplyDelete
  3. If you live in the good old US of A, you can watch it on WWE.com

    Shawn Michaels and Diesel vs. 1-2-3 Kid...

    ReplyDelete
  4. This is still incredibly relevant. And I think you can boil it all down to a line of yours Scott, about the company telling the fans what they want to see. That is easily the biggest plague in wrestling since WCW went out of business. The WWF turned their back on listening to the fans when they refused to push RVD as a top guy and WWF Champion despite him being a more popular babyface in late 2001 than Rock, Undertaker, Kane, and any of the old WWF guard.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The dream was over.


    Coming up: Was the dream really over? Yes it was. Or was it?

    ReplyDelete
  6. You could extend the King Lear analogy to Vince's relationship to Stephanie and Shane. Shane states his loyalty while Stephanie professes her love, so naturally he gives the kingdom to Stephanie and we're seeing the effect of that move, while Shane is gone and doing his own thing successfully and is likely never going to come back to the company.

    ReplyDelete
  7. The saddest part about rereading this essay (and it remains a favorite to this day) is the name drop of ECW as the template. There's no template around that the WWE can really draw off of unless they look to the glory days of Ring of Honor or Puroresu, neither of which seem very likely at all.

    The more time goes by, the more and more I start to feel like Vince is going to have to die or have some incident which drives him out of the day to day running of the company, leading to Triple H and Steph taking over. Which at that point will accelerate the collapse and lead to someone purchasing the company out of its bankruptcy and starting from scratch. The one thing that feels increasingly true however is that Vince has lost all touch with how to turn this ship around, and I don't know how much faith we can have in those serving under him at the moment.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Great rant -- after reading it, I had to go and look up those old Billionaire Ted skits. They seemed pretty lame then, but man they are downright embarrassing now. It's a nice time capsule though and a piece of insight into Vince's mindset at the time. It really shows how far off the mark he was in hitting the right tone with the whole "New WWF Generation" direction.

    You had some seriously low hanging fruit with WCW all bogged down with Hogan and the Dungeon of Doom feud and yet the best Vince could come up with was "The Nacho Man" and "Scheme Gene". He got in a few good ribs on Hogan, but otherwise the whole thing was so ridiculously juvenile that it never really came off as the skewering of WCW he was going for. Vince liked to see himself as the progressive guy in the industry, but he really had the same problem -- he was still trying to do the 1980s WWF formula, he was just trying to do it with younger guys.



    It's a good thing that Bischoff got aggressive when he did and that the NWO was as dark as it was and broke the mold of grinning babyface heroes vs cartoony heels, because you gotta think wrestling as an industry was sliding right out of relevance in 1995 and early 1996.

    ReplyDelete
  9. What is the general consensus on the WWF/E deciding in 1999 to go public and carrying out the plan in 2000 (even after the dot com bubble burst)? It certainly pumped millions into the company, but longterm it seems they would have been a whole lot better just sticking solely to wrestling and not having to answer to anybody but the networks/advertisers. Seems like Vince and company in general spread themselves too thin.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Best line of the entire post: and a reinvention of what weekly episodic TV (ROYALTIES! I FUCKING WANT ROYALTIES!)

    ReplyDelete
  11. I dispute that pushing Ahmed Johnson in '96 was a bad idea. He was a pretty good worker for a big guy, and if he didn't get injured like all the time, he would have been something special.

    ReplyDelete
  12. As far as impacting the entertainment value of the product -- I absolutely think it hurts it.

    One issue is that wrestling has always been slow to adopt to cultural changes -- it always seems to be a bit behind the curve with the rest of the entertainment industry. Every promoter milks their good ideas far beyond the point of diminishing returns. As a public company, I think that gives them even less flexibility as far as that goes, because now they have investors to please and sponsors who are able to dictate their content.

    ReplyDelete
  13. "It took a total cleansing of the heel-babyface system, the gimmick system, the lockerroom, and a reinvention of what weekly episodic TV (ROYALTIES! I FUCKING WANT ROYALTIES!) "


    So the longest weekly episodic television bullshit is SCOTT'S FAULT?!?!?

    ReplyDelete
  14. Isn't it also on a Coliseum Video?

    ReplyDelete
  15. They have had a template to steal from over the last 8-10 years, that of MMA (particularly UFC). And this is coming from someone who has no use for MMA. But even I wouldn't deny its success or how it has taken some of what used to make pro wrestling work.
    You might have seen that had Shane become the chief creative force rather than Stephanie, as he is a well known fan of MMA. He was also an important solicitor for going with a more aggressive approach in '97, which of course turned into the Attitude era. Makes you miss him a little more, doesn't it?

    ReplyDelete
  16. This was Scott's moment where he went from RSPW midcarder to someone
    that you know would be a star...

    "Also note years later that Vince really is losing his mind compared to his younger days, and pretty much kicked heir apparent Shane McMahon out of his “kingdom” and replaced him with HHH instead."

    To be fair, HHH wanted it more. And I think we're better off, don't forget that Shane was the guy that convinced Vince to give Russo more power.

    "I’m kind of omitting Shawn’s drug suspension here, which TO THIS DAY he claims was a setup to smear his good name, which was the reason behind switching the title to Ramon in the first place. Because if you’re looking for someone dependable and drug-free, think Scott Hall."

    You know, I kind of believe Shawn here. After all, he's come clean about things far worse than this, and he was such a gigantic asshole back then that's it's not to far-fetched to think that someone would try to fuck him over, and it's not like no one else was on the gas.

    "The four men had a ****1/2 tag team match with each other on an early episode of WWF Action Zone that only served to demonstrate how good they could be together and how lazy they tended to get otherwise. (Look it up on YouTube! It’s AWESOME! It’s not on DVD and it totally should be.)"

    It IS awesome! Would give it the full monty if the match actually meant something.

    "Diesel won the match against Backlund in 6 seconds with a kick to the gut and a powerbomb, taking the title and kicking off the wretched "New WWF Generation" era. (He was like Hulk Hogan, but with less moves and better hair.)"

    That's not fair. Nash was a pretty good worker in 1995, it's only when he signed with WCW again and stopped giving a fuck that he got really shitty. And it's not like he was given good opponents.

    "The WWF was doing the same repetitive nonsense that they were mocking WCW for, (Example: They ragged on WCW for using shoes and hot coffee over and over, but RAW was filled with screwjob finishes and run-ins just as frequently)"

    THANK YOU!

    "Take Bob Holly, for instance. When he started in the WWF, he was called "Sparky" Thurman Plugg, which is a semi-clever play on "STP" and "spark plug". Hah hah, right? But just looking at that gimmick, do you cheer him or boo him? And why? (You boo him because he’s a dick, although we didn’t know how much of one at that point.)"

    This is why whenever I hear "Be A Star!" I just think "Fuck you, Vince!" See also: JBL, Orton.

    "Bret ended up being a transitional champion to Shawn Michaels, a situation which enraged him so much that he ended up taking 6 months off and nearly jumped to WCW in the process as the famed "third man" for the nWo. (That is not correct. Bret was never even considered for it.)"

    I still maintain that Bret wouldn't have worked in that role, and I think everyone knew it. I'm willing to be even Bret himself will admit it.

    Great read. Any way you can 2012 Scott sez the Lazarus rant, Scott?

    ReplyDelete
  17. Agreed. I was marking out for him at the time, and I normally hate faces by default.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Oh yeah, it definitely hurts the product. One advantage (really the only advantage) that TNA has over WWE is that the can do whatever the hell they please, because they don't have shareholders to worry about. Plus they don't have to devote valuable time and money to non-wrestling bullshit to keep revenue up. Yet another example of Vince refusing to just accept being a good wrestling promoter.

    ReplyDelete
  19. My favorite moment from the Billionaire Ted skits just might be the biggest irony of all time: Vince Russo struggling to think of a good idea.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Thank you to Steve for making the request. Now all we need to do is bug Scott for a Scott says take on Lazarus (perhaps a Christmas present for all of us, his loyal BOD readers:)


    As for the inference that Bret was unmotivated during much of '95, well I won't argue that he didn't have much reason to be fired up for most of the year. However, he actually had a lot of good matches during that stretch. His Rumble match with Diesel was top drawer, his IYH match with Hakushi was very good, and they had an even better follow-up on Raw in July. Yes, his WM match with Backlund was boring, and the Kiss my Foot match with Lawler was nothing great, but at least their feud was good. He carried a very green future Kane to a good match at Summerslam, and had a hell of a match with Jean-Pierre Lafitte at IYH 3. They even had a good follow-up on Raw a week later. And it would all lead to him getting the title back in November.
    I'm not saying that when Bret dogged it, it wasn't an ugly sight (see his match with Taker at the '96 Rumble for a good example). But that long stretch in '95 wasn't really the case, and Hallelujah for that.

    ReplyDelete
  21. THREADJACK!: Manny Pacquiao just got KNOCKED THE FUCK OUT! HA! Bigoted asshole!

    ReplyDelete
  22. wouldn't it be awesome if Marquez came out in the post fight press conference for the icing on the cake?

    ReplyDelete
  23. Shit like this is why I read Scott Keith.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Oh yeah, that would be hilarious. Not nearly as funny as that idiot Mayweather's comments that we'll hear soon. Should have just taken the fight when you had the chance assholes, the amount of money thrown away by him and Pacq over the last couple years is just astounding. Couldn't have happened to 2 nicer guys...

    ReplyDelete
  25. That was a SergioMartinez-Williams or Hearns-Duran level KO. That was boxing at the highest of levels, too. Conspiracy theorists may point to the former Balco dude training Marquez (and Marquez looking the strongest he ever has), but this was still a great, great fight. Pacman was way too aggressive and active (more than any of the other previous three fights) and it was his downfall. Marquez, to his credit, has always been an extremely intelligent fighter and sharpshooter. He was ducked by Naseem Hamed for the first half of his career. He was severely underappreciated in the second half of his career. Now, he has himself a KO that will live on in the annals of boxing history.

    ReplyDelete
  26. "Had ECW not been around to provide a template, it's sketchy at best as
    to whether or not Vince would have known how to go about recreating
    himself and his promotion, and it's even sketchier whether the WWF
    fanbase would have been receptive to those changes."

    I think we have our answer to this. Vince has been unable to recreate his promotion nowadays when there is no hot indy promotion to rip off and they can't really rip off ECW again because going extremely violent would be more controversial today in an era when many people want to ban football because its too violent. WWE was fortunate that the incident involving a certain unperson happened before the media started to care about concussions because the media would have talked about concussions instead of steroids if it happened a few years later. Anything WWE does that increases the risk of concussions increases the risk of an incident that could get the media after WWE and it'd be much harder to weather that storm due to the previous incident.

    ReplyDelete
  27. RVD was/is also an unreliable druggie.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Hopefully Marquez will finally get his due, I've always thought he was the better boxer over the series, and this proves it. And while Marquez will have the Balco trainer thing hanging over his head (and with good reason, out of all the people in the world why him?) the fact that Pacman didn't take a rematch of his last screwjob loss says on it's own that he was just here for the money, and it showed.

    ReplyDelete
  29. I think some of the posters here are overstating the influence of ECW just a little bit. I enjoyed ECW while it existed, but I can't stand the notion that they spawned the Attitude movement somehow. They helped some of the head honchos of WWF and WCW to think outside the box and they helped polish Foley and Austin--I don't think I can give them much more than that as far as credit goes for the wrestling explosion of the late 90s.



    I also think that as cancerous as the Clique was, they were also spearheading the movement towards realism and shades of gray in wrestling (and definitely had Vince's ear more than a syndicated wrestling show that might come on at 2am Sunday morning). It was Diesel who really wanted the tweener gimmick after the loss to Bret and made it work until they had to turn him heel on his way out. It was Shawn in late 96 to mid 97 who started his own version of the tweener in wrestling. It was Nash and Hall who made the nWo in the Summer of 96, and wrestling as a whole, cutting edge TV. ECW, if you'll recall, had the bWo because, ya know, they changed wrestling n all.


    I disagree with 1999 Scott here with the benefit of hindsight: WWF was not a walking corpse in 1997. Bret Hart and Steve Austin changed the way we thought about faces, heels, and what real feuds (for the WWF, at least) should be. I know most of us here on the BoD want to time travel to 1997 or 2000 on a weekly basis, it seems.



    Don't get me wrong here, however--legendary rant. I read it twice when it first came out and never forgot it.

    ReplyDelete
  30. I thought it might be on the Stars of the 90s DVD they put out a while back, but I could be wrong. Pettingil and his metaphors to Power Rangers and Crash Test Dummies are awful, but this was Shawn starting to realize his fullest potential and it's a beautiful match to watch.

    ReplyDelete
  31. ... and after King Vince McMahon won the Monday Night War and got fat and full he never ever listened to the fans again.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Agreed, I believe that ECW and the Clique were both tapping into the same zeitgeist of the 90s. I mean, heroes being anti-social badasses was hardly an invention of ECW.

    ReplyDelete
  33. absolutely. 1995 Bret Hart really reminds me of how he handled being shoved back into the midcard two years earlier - by trying to have better matches than everyone else on the card (although by 1995 the landscape obviously had changed and it was a lot harder than in 1993).

    ReplyDelete
  34. but I am pretty sure that's not the reason why they didn't give him a real main event spot in 2001.

    ReplyDelete
  35. it is. "Slamfest 95".

    ReplyDelete
  36. I'm pretty sure alien bugs have nested inside Hulk Hogan's head.


    No, I don't have any proof, but neither do you, so I can sleep soundly.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Some sources suggest that Shane is a fuckup and while leaving the reigns to Stephanie isn't the perfect choice, it's still better than leaving it to Shane.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Anyone else chose to talk about wrestling for their school projects? I did and always ended up getting an average mark for it even though I knew what I had written was good, but I guess I was marked down because I chose to talk about wrasslin'. I bet if I did a crappy project on Martin Luther King, I would have got top marks for it and the teacher would have fapped all over the paper.

    ReplyDelete
  39. does anyone why Shane isn't working for WWF anymore? I had just assumed he stepped away because he didn't want to stay in the business, but perhaps it's more than that?

    ReplyDelete
  40. The strongest thing I've heard is that he wanted to become his own man, not being handed the business by his dad. Honestly, when Vince dies, I could see Shane coming back to help on the business end of things, much like Linda used to to the majority of before she left to fail twice running for office.

    ReplyDelete
  41. I always got the impression was good at what he does but he just wasn't as obsessed with the business or as much of a workaholic as Vince and Stephanie was. In Vince's world you're a fuck-up if you don't devote 80 hours a week to the job. By all reports Shane is successful in his new job. Then again who really knows what really goes on in Titan Towers.

    ReplyDelete
  42. Unfortunately, it's not. Though it darn well should have been.

    ReplyDelete
  43. I think that comes from a lot of people here - myself included - being "Heyman guys." I'm sure that ECW had some part in reshaping the WWF in the mid-90s, but you're right, it's more likely that Heyman had ideas similar to the guys that were already on the payroll.

    ReplyDelete
  44. it's hard to say how much influence ECW had because the WWF guys have a motivation to deny it. It is important to remember that time slots, ratings, etc. don't necessarily tell the whole story for influence. Wrestlers like Jericho, Hart, and Foley have noted in their books the influence of the so-called dirtsheets, even though they had miniscule subscription rates. They say bookers paid an inordinate amount of attention to them. I can imagine ECW was similar. Guys may not have been watching ECW every week, but they read about it and knew what was going on.

    ReplyDelete
  45. yeah but it's not like WWF and WCW weren't still running with superheroes and dumb gimmicks in the mid-90s. I think it's entirely possible to believe that they noticed the success, although on a limited basis, of ECW with an edgier product. I find it hard to believe that WWF's transition to the attitude era was a coincidence at the same time they were hearing ECW chants at their events, had signed guys with ECW experience, and put Heyman on the payroll.

    ReplyDelete
  46. exactly. Since I'm not a boxing fan anymore (I was a huge one in the 90s, had a subscription to Ring magazine, watched Tuesday night at the fights on USA, etc.) I just laugh at the money those two idiots threw away. Both are complete jackasses and aren't worth rooting for.

    ReplyDelete
  47. I think Bret could have worked as the 3rd man. Not as well as Hogan of course, but Bret's heel mic work in 97 showed me he could have done some great promos on the crowd in WCW just like he did in WWF. The bigger issue would have been ring work. Hogan played Honkytonk Man in 96-97 and it was huge. Fans knew he couldn't beat anyone but he still escaped with the belt. That made them hate him more. Doubtful Bret could have played that role. Having Bret actually BE better than the WCW guys as the head of the NWO would have had a completely different dynamic. Probably not as successful but also pretty interesting IMO

    ReplyDelete
  48. except that these days WWE would be better off if Vince devoted 8 hours instead of 80, at least the on-screen product.

    ReplyDelete
  49. yeah because Vince has never put a belt on a druggie before. {{insert eyeroll}}

    ReplyDelete
  50. Caliber_Winfield_69420BoobiesDecember 9, 2012 at 9:41 AM

    For my GED testing, we had to write an essay. Well, the subject was about whether or not forced retirement is a good thing.

    I chose to talk about Hulk Hogan and that whole aspect with wrestling. 100 out of 100, baby.

    ReplyDelete
  51. Caliber_Winfield_69420BoobiesDecember 9, 2012 at 9:42 AM

    No need for thread-jacks if you use....

    http://boardforpeople.proboards.com/index.cgi

    ReplyDelete
  52. I was thinking the same thing. Ahmed was over enough with the fans to justify a push.

    ReplyDelete
  53. Reading these old rants is fascinating- both for the era-specific comments (this was written DURING the Pro Wrestling Boom/Attitude Era), and for how right some of it turned out to be. It's also funny to see Scott correct himself over time- I know he gets some guff from the serious news-people like Meltzer because of the factual errors that get repeated over time (the Borga Title Run, Bret going nWo, etc.), but obviously a business as mired in bullshit and egotism as this tends to breed mistakes and false promises.

    ReplyDelete
  54. Oh, definitely ECW was involved, but I don't think it was Vince who really noticed. I could easily see the Kliq realize that maybe ECW was doing something right and also try to turn Vince onto "edgier" (I hate that word) programming.

    ReplyDelete
  55. BUT SHANE IS OUR WRESTLING JESUS!!!

    ReplyDelete
  56. How many times has Vince made a drug addict their TOP guy. Shawn Michaels and uh...? I hope you aren't comparing the two, RVD was over, yes, but he also had a lot of downsides to him, Shawn Michaels may have been a drug-addled douche, but at least HBK could y'know....cut promos....and not injure people.

    ReplyDelete
  57. I know we all have fond memories of Bret Hart, but if they had of done things Brets way we would have gotten him defending the title against bad guys until he retired. He just didn't get it when wrestling started to change. Case in point, he was a great heel in 1997, but that came about because he thought he was still the good guy, complaining about how he was wronged.

    ReplyDelete
  58. yeah because he was never told by the bookers to complain and whine {{insert eyeroll}}



    That was the character he was told to play. It was done for a couple possible purposes. Either to undercut Bret or to turn him heel. It did both actually.



    Now that said, I do think Bret didn't get the changes in the business in some ways. But it's not like he wasn't doing great work and solid business with Austin, who was along with Shawn the poster children for the changing business. He may have adapted, he may not have. Bottom line is Vince decided he couldn't, made up a BS story about not being able to pay him and sent him of to WCW with a screwjob. The rest is history.

    ReplyDelete
  59. I always assumed that was the case. I've heard many rumors that Vince is too busy to pay attention to other promotions. Stories about talent being introduced to Vince and realizing that everything he knew was what Cornette or JR or whoever told him. My understanding is that Shane and Vince Russo were big proponents of an edgier product. I'm sure the Kliq and others (Austin and foley for sure) were also involved.

    ReplyDelete
  60. RVD smoked pot. Compare that to 3/4 of the roster being coked up in the 80s. compare that to Orton or Mysterio being busted for wellness violations and in Orton's case being a major hassle backstage. He put the IC belt on Razor when he was an issue.
    Kerry Von Erich too.



    If he thinks it will sell and it doesn't offend his political sensibilities (big key) then he looks the other way for bad behavior and/or drugs.



    I mean honestly, can you give me some facts about RVD being unreliable? He got busted in a car one time. Bad timing for sure, but the guy showed up, worked his matches, and was reliable. That's more than you can say for some other Vince favorites like Sid, Warrior, and Shawn.

    ReplyDelete
  61. The roster was a lot deeper in 2001 than it was in 1995. He didn't have other options.


    RVD wrestled a fairly injury common style (how long was he out with the busted ankle?) and while he worked his matches, he cut shitty promos and he did injure people.

    ReplyDelete
  62. Uh, I fail to see how Vince didn't do anything but help Bret in that scenario.


    He gave him a great babyface angle and got him the opportunity for a million dollar a year contract. Plus it was all "real". If Bret could remove his head from his ass and realize that it was fiction, he really could've taken advantage of the gold-mine that Vince gave him instead of bitching about being screwed.

    ReplyDelete
  63. that wasn't my point. My point was Vince gave him a contract in 96 with no talk of turning him heel. almost from the minute he came back, the commentators ran him down, they had him start whining, and they jobbed him out most matches. Either they were screwing with him (my theory) or they planned on turning him heel from the beginning and just didn't bother to tell him (not cool with a star of his caliber with the time he had put in with the company). My comment about Vince's true motives in ditching Bret and sending him off to WCW have nothing to do with whether Bret failed to take advantage of it or not. that point is debatable as he was certainly a victim of horrid booking and politics in addition to his alleged issues.



    But again my point was not about how Bret reacted when he got to WCW, it was about how he was treated from the minute he came in 96 until he left and how Vince BSed about money when in reality he felt Bret wasn't a good fit for the attitude era, both on camera and backstage.

    ReplyDelete
  64. he stayed pretty darn healthy save one bad injury in the dying days of ECW. shitty promos have nothing to do with your belief that he was unreliable. As far as injuring people, every "outsider" that came in to WWE was accused of injuring others or not being able to work the WWE style if they got over. jericho, the radicals, Booker T, DDP, heck all the WCW guys, etc. It was a defense mechanism for guys threatened by newcomers who were over. If RVD accidentally potatoed someone, it was a giant issue and he was "unsafe." If HHH, UT, Edge, etc. potatoed someone, it was just an accident and them trying to work close.



    Double standard.

    ReplyDelete
  65. I wasn't really responding to your general post. Vince's shitty booking of him and the lies are one thing to be angry about, but Bret being pissed about the screwjob itself, when it was such a golden opportunity from a commercial and critical standpoint kinda boggles my mind.


    And Bret had to know that he was being portrayed as an idiot and a goof, why didn't he y'know...do something about it instead of bottling it up and acting like a passive aggressive creep.

    ReplyDelete
  66. Double standard? He kicked in Triple H's larynx! You talk about if's and maybe's, but name a time when Triple H injured someone, name a time Undertaker injured someone.


    RVD sucks and he didn't have what took to be a main-eventer, not now and certainly not then, when WWE was loaded with talented guys who could work, cut promos, have an interesting character and not smoke weed everday.

    ReplyDelete
  67. "(You boo him because he’s a dick, although we didn’t know how much of one at that point.)"



    Lines like that keep me coming back...

    ReplyDelete
  68. Here it is on DailyMotion

    http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x7t6n9_diesel-shawn-michaels-vs-razor-ramo_sport?search_algo=2

    ReplyDelete
  69. Caliber_Winfield_69420BoobiesDecember 11, 2012 at 5:10 AM

    Yup. Got my Good Enough Diploma when I was 16. Got my degree when I was 19.

    I dropped out after 9th grade because the school system was pathetic. Teachers didn't care, I wasn't challenged whatsoever, and I didn't feel like putting up with the bullshit of highschool anymore. So I left.

    ReplyDelete
  70. *applauds* Considering the shit I went through in high school, I wish I'd had that option.

    ReplyDelete
  71. Caliber_Winfield_69420BoobiesDecember 11, 2012 at 1:01 PM

    I was very fortunate to have really understanding parents. I sat them down and explained my reasons, and what I had planned. They talked it over, and let me do it.

    ReplyDelete
  72. Yep. Would have been a great monster heel

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment