Thursday, September 4, 2014

The Booking Sheet

How often is the answer to a question in professional wrestling as simple as just saying ‘Lance Storm’?

Last week, I wrote more than a few words about the Intercontinental title and it’s, shall we say, horrendously atrocious booking done by those who probably have combined IQs equal to a severely retarded walrus.

But that PALES in comparison to the gleeful destruction of the once-proud United States Championship. And this week, we’re going to look at where it belongs on the midcard, and how the title can be rehabilitated….hopefully.

The US championship pretty much became the sullen 13 year old that came with the marriage when the WWE swallowed up WCW whole. While the IC title was a creation of Vince’s and therefore a blessing from the Gods, the US title was a crappy reminder of life in Hell. In the list of the top 10 wrestlers who have held the belt for the most number of days, Dean Ambrose comes in at #8, ahead of Nikita Koloff. I would wager to guess that at least 2-300 of those days came about because he forgot the belt at home and no one really noticed anyway.

Of course, right now, Sheamus is currently using the belt to prop up some loose drainpipes after winning it in a Battle Royale (the culmination of all great wrestling feuds); first things first, we need to get that thing off of him.

WHO SHOULD WIN THE TITLE:

Lance Storm.

See, the one thing that the US title has going for it is that it can be used to tap into the jingoism that the WWE is so effective at coercing from the audience. You can count on the crowd chanting ‘USA’ pretty much on cue whenever presented with one of the following:

-A flag
-A soldier
-A firefighter or police officer (this last is less true in Missouri these days)
-An opponent who glanced at the US flag sideways
-Curtis Axel (gotta chant SOMETHING when we’re bored. See also: Divas, The)

So, get the crowd invested in their own pseudo-patriotism by having a foreigner degenerate the belt in front of them. Of course, the last guy to do that was our answer: Lance Storm, the one and only Canadian heavyweight champion in WCW history. Unless, of course, you count what John Cena did to the belt as degenerating it; if you do, you are correct, but we’re going with Storm’s renaming of the belt for our purposes. The angle drew heat, put the spotlight on the belt, and made it a bigger deal when…sigh….Hugh G. Rection won it from him and rechristened it the United States Championship.

I hate it when my point falls apart because of a Vince Russo dick joke.

Alright, so Storm is out. To be fair, my expert sources claim he’s retired anyway, so we need another guy. Perhaps another foreigner, one who can use the belt as a way to gain even more heat, a way to build on some sort of Anti-USA fervor….



WHY HASN’T THE BELT BEEN WELDED AROUND HIS WAIST FOR MONTHS NOW? (Not Xavier Woods)

It’s amusing to me that this type of booking needs to even be discussed. There has never been a more perfect way to both rebuild a title and to keep building a character.

Rusev, love him or hate him, has been booked extremely well to this point, especially for someone who will in all likelihood be jobbing to Cena soon. There is almost literally no reason that he shouldn’t have won the title from Sheamus by now, rechristened it the Russian Federation Championship, and pissed all over it while singing a Russian translation of Yankee Doodle Dandy.

One of the keys to this booking, especially in rehabbing the United States title, is to wash the stink off the belt that has been associated with its less than frequent title defenses. So, I’m going to suggest a two-pronged approach to this whole idea.

#1 – Rusev wins the belt in convincing fashion, and 2.

RUSEV DEFENDS THE BELT ALL THE TIME:

Let’s face the facts here – Rusev isn’t sniffing the World title anytime soon if anyone up in Stanford has any brains. He shouldn’t be near the inevitable Cena burial either. What we need is to establish a hierarchy of titles in the WWE, with the World and IC belts being defended very rarely on TV, and the US title being the modern equal of the fabled Television belt. That’s pretty much the only way this whole thing can work, if each belt has different levels of importance in the pecking order of the Fed.

So, Rusev wins the belt. And he should defend it. On Raw. On Smackdown. On Main Event if you want. Hell, invent a show called ‘Rusev defends the US title’ and have him defend it there. The point is that Rusev should be dominating and crushing everything in his path for the next, say, year or so.

And after each match, he should gloat to beat the band. He should point out how he has dominated the United States in match after match. Lana can invent more medals to give him, rename the belt a la Mr. Storm as stated above, and just in general be a dick. It always works, especially if you don’t shoot him too far beyond what he can handle.

The enduring part of the whole storyline is that Rusev has to defend that belt all the time to drive home the point that a Russian is holding an American title because…..

AMERICANS ARE GIANT BITCHES ABOUT ‘MERICA:

We’re not exactly fond of people pointing out our shortcomings down South of the border.

I was sort of embarrassed, for any number of reasons, about the Swagger/Colter stuff over the last year; but the thing that BUGGED the shit out of me was the complete willingness of the crowd to chant ‘We the People’ after Colter was saying the most racist crap on the mic he could to incite as much of a reaction as he could. Yes, the crowd knew who the heels were supposed to be, but getting a crowd to chant along like a bunch of monkeys isn’t exactly rocket science.

But here’s what truly disturbed me about the whole thing; Swagger’s face turn didn’t involve ANY TYPE OF TURN. He just started saying racist/jingoistic shit about a BAD foreigner, and the crowd all of a sudden loves the guy, and Colter’s just lovable old Zeb who was kicked in the head by the bad guy and isn’t it swell that he’s back to support Jack and his quest to beat up said bad guy? It spoke terribly, at least to me, about how we have no self-awareness as a culture of people as to when we’re being played, that we’re willing to root for anyone who waves the right flag and boo the guy who waves the wrong one regardless of the substance of their character. It’s not a great reflection of the United States, if you think about it.

On the other hand….



But when there’s a dollar to be made, exploit the hell out of it. It’s the REAL American way. And exploiting American patriotism is so easy, our government does it on a regular basis and not only gets away with it, it’s one of the few things they occasionally get praised for. (Occasionally. Most of the time, we hate the bums so much, we just re-elect them.)

And we walk right into it, every time. As stated above, Lance Storm, not exactly the strongest promo in the world, had quite the thing going in re-christening every title he won in WCW as a Canadian belt. Imagine what Lana could do with the US title on her arm and the mic in her hand.

It would be a thing of beauty.

The fact is, Rusev’s character was made for this belt, and this time. It will allow you to build up a babyface using the ‘Merica aspect of that character if they choose, or they can just use Rusev as a machine to draw the heat. Either way, it actually uses the United States title as something that is, stunningly, relevant; a feat which it has been struggling to accomplish for quite some time now.

And that would be something to salute.

Rick Poehling

@MrSoze on Twitter

33 comments:

  1. Agree - imagine if he had won the belt 2 months ago and started calling it the Russian Federation Championship because the United States was too weak. Throw a couple sickles & hammers on there and you've got some serious heat

    ReplyDelete
  2. Agree totally. And the hell with Jack Swagger.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Totally off topic: Before the WWF took over the contract, WrestleMania 2000 was suppose to be a WCW game.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Lesnar may be a great wrestler, but he sucks at real estate.

    http://www.latimes.com/business/realestate/hot-property/la-fi-hotprop-brock-lesnar-house-20140903-story.html

    ReplyDelete
  5. Sickles and hammers?

    Today you learn that Russia is not the USSR.

    ReplyDelete
  6. So give the IC belt to Rusev?


    Yeah, works for me.

    ReplyDelete
  7. There's some really good booking ideas here once you calmed down with the non-stop jokes and sarcasm, but when Scott has a post about Quality Control, and the next post up has "severely retarded walrus" right before the page break, a lot of people will assume that this is just going to end with another meltdown and move on.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Kyle ruined it for everyone.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Fair enough. I actually liked that one, though. As for the quality control thing, I said in the comments over there and meant it, I'm up for whatever people want to do with those of us who aren't Scott or Bayless. No meltdown from me, though - I do this to have fun, and none of the meltdowns have looked very fun.


    Except for the comments section, that did look fun.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Yeah, I know. Should've said Putin and a Bear or something like that. Was typing the comment while working on other things and not thinking completely.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Yeah, I don't get why people take this so seriously that they just completely lose it. If it's getting to someone that bad, they should move on. It's an online blog that can easily avoided, not an abusive relationship.


    Anyway, I think people deserve a tryout chance on the BoD, and this is a much more interesting concept than some of the other random posts out there.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I admit, it's interesting to me that people want less content - I think I do agree that we should all be on a schedule as to when we post and how often. I think that would help out a lot in seeing who people dig and who they don't. But it's not my blog, so I'm not making decisions here, just going with the flow. Thanks for the kind words, man.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Thank you.

    Thank you very much.

    Wouldn't Meekin's shit parade have more to do with it then my one fuck up pushing things over the edge.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Ha, just put put ins face completely over the front of the belt.

    ReplyDelete
  15. that would have been such an awkward title for a WCW game. WHAT WERE THEY THINKING! #stupidWCW

    ReplyDelete
  16. My booking: Rusev wins this US title and defends it against all comers (wait for it) who aren't American. This goes on for a few PPVs and he loses the title to Swagger at Wrestlemania, huge We the People for that finish and scene.

    ReplyDelete
  17. I know dude isn't hurting for money or anything, but you'd think the 43 acres of land alone would nab him more than $750K

    ReplyDelete
  18. Sheamus hasn't even defended the championship on TV since early July (except for one squash of Poor Sandow), the same time when Rusev began his anti-US run feuds against legit contenders in that range like Big E and Swagger. Trying to understand why WWE even bothers with secondary titles is futile.

    ReplyDelete
  19. People don't want less content. They want less stupidity. Less alps posting to hear himself talk, less qotd bullshit where dude doesn't even bother writing an article, just outsources it to everyone else. Shit I don't mind scrolling sometimes but when I have to go to page 2 or 3 before I see anything I want to read, it speaks a lot about the quantity of quality posts.

    ReplyDelete
  20. No. Meekin is fun to mock. You're kinda the opposite

    ReplyDelete
  21. An emulator mod must exist of that...

    ReplyDelete
  22. I feel like here is an appropriate place to say that Chikara has a team called Bloc Party that has guys named Mr. Azerbaijan and possibly the weirdest wrestling gimmick ever, The Proletariat Boar of Moldova.

    ReplyDelete
  23. I agree, and i hate to piss on anyone writing here, but some of the posts here are beyond redundant. In a world where between the Network and YouTube, almost every match ever is at our fingertips, do we really need "rants" that catalog every match move by move and just restate the obvious about booking? I like it for the current stuff and of course all of Scott's rants but some of this stuff is just relentlessly dull and, not to be a dick, but not really well written.

    ReplyDelete
  24. I'll take that as a compliment?

    ReplyDelete
  25. I know a guy who made a music video for a pigeon who was prominently featured in CHIKARA. It is a weird, weird subculture.

    ReplyDelete
  26. The name was going to be World Championship Wrestling.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Also, WrestleMania Challenge's original name was WWF Survivor Series. There's a screen shot of the title screen.

    ReplyDelete
  28. "The US championship pretty much became the sullen 13 year old that came with the marriage when the WWE swallowed up WCW whole."

    Excellent line, good article!

    ReplyDelete
  29. There's a simple one word explanation: Mattel.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Rusev wearing it and turning it into a Russian title is a funny idea... but there is a better option:

    Just get rid of it already.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Funny you should mention that... I've always wondered - and this has nothing to do with you being a bad writer or anything Rick - why wrestling fans LOVE seeing events reviewed over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over... I know that may have been a little much, but I really want to get across how many review articles I've seen in my lifetime. I'm not even someone who likes them!

    How many times and in how many ways does one need to be told that Razor and Shawn's original ladder match rules but may not hold up, or that Wrestlemania IX is a slow drudge through mediocrity?

    What REALLY goes above and beyond though is the "bad event" wrestling reviews. I could write a bad event review mad lib, I swear. Every reviewer seems to include the whole "act like I've been forced to watch this and sarcastically 'thank' whomever for this show/match/gimmick/team/joke/whatever"...

    I'm not saying there is anything wrong with it. You like what you like. Especially in a culture like we have currently, where we are more in love with sequels and regurgitation like never before (7 or so F&tF and counting, the trillions of Marvel movies), I shouldn't be surprised.

    I'd like to see more articles with unique concepts, maybe perspectives on gimmicks, or... well, I guess it'd be easier to just say what I'd rather not see - event/match reviews and top 10 lists...

    Sorry for the comment novel. ;)

    ReplyDelete