Skip to main content

Tryout #3: Mike Mears

(A quick note before we start: This is is a Raw review that will assume you’ve watched the show. It will not be a straightforward, sequential segment-by-segment, match-by-match review, but it’s not exactly what I thought it would be, either. But walking you through a play-by-play is something I have no interest in doing, and since I’m assuming you watched the show, I’m also going to assume you also have your own opinion on the show as a whole. And I’m open to suggestions for a name if I do this regularly. I thought “Rawtopsy” sounded cute, but it looks dumb when written.)

By Mike Mears

Behind This Very Curtain....

    In many ways, the WWE pulled the curtain back- or broke down the fourth wall, if that’s the metaphor you prefer- decades ago. Some would argue it never truly existed, but that’s neither here nor there.  Starting with the CM Punk “pipe bomb” of June 2011, we entered an era in which backstage machinations- or, perhaps more importantly, our perception of what those machinations are- played a more active, central part in main event storylines than ever before.

    Daniel Bryan’s rise to superstardom, exponentially sped up over the last three months, has seen this trend hit critical mass. We have the actual powers-that-be playing semi-fictionalized versions of themselves more meta than the brilliant Mr. McMahon caricature of yesteryear ever could have dreamed to be. (More importantly, than he would have wanted to be.) Oh, sure we know they actually love Daniel Bryan. But it works on multiple levels. To the kids who weren’t alive yet when Stone Cold was raging against the machine, they don’t know this, plus this is all new. To the rest of us, it plays off of our own insecurities as “smart” fans. We know it, mostly, but even when they’re serving us Daniel Bryan on a silver platter, they’ve created just enough doubt. Was I bothered by him looking like an idiot, walking right into the RKO? Sure. But every babyface pretty much ever has brazenly walked into the heel’s trap like an idiot, with more guts than brains.

    Even if whatever subtlety in this storyline has long since gone by the wayside, they’re still able to play with the sensibilities of the smart fan to create that doubt. That little bit of creeping doubt, that maybe every think they don’t really believe but what we’ve been lead to think they believe- that Bryan doesn’t fit what they want their superstars to be- is all there needs to be.

    Unlike with the Summer of Punk, the worry here isn’t that Triple H is going to steal heat for himself, or cut the legs out from underneath the one-time indy darling turned hottest thing in wrestling. It’s that they might go too far in making themselves out to be supervillians standing in the way of the everyman. It’s a great story, which is why it’s been reimagined countless times in every form of storytelling that exists. But there’s a point of diminishing returns even for someone as absurdly over, and absurdly talented, as Daniel Bryan. I have no concerns about them letting Bryan get his heat back, or even eventually win the title back. Those things will happen. My concern is if they know how to get there. They collected the underpants in step one, and they know step three is profit (in this case, meaning they obviously see money in Bryan). Do they know step two?

    With Cena on the shelf for perhaps the rest of the year and Punk existing in his own bubble outside the rest of the WWE sphere in his feud with Heyman- not to mention others often considered for-better-or-worse Cena alternatives like Orton (turned heel) and Sheamus (himself injured) not available for that role- they’d damn well better.

“It seems like the people here disagree with you on what’s best for business,” Bryan told Stephanie McMahon in the opening promo, shortly before slapping the mic out of her hand in a bit that was just unspeakably awesome. Once again, they’ve successfully involved the fans, empowering them and making it look like they’re taking an active role in the direction of the company. We chose CM Punk, and now we chose Daniel Bryan. Co-opt “reality” all you want, but make sure you have an endgame.

Meanwhile, in an alternate universe....

    As I alluded to, our other hero is kind of existing in his own separate sphere right now. (Ironically, this is the way Cena should have been used starting at least two years ago, as a full-time special attraction of sorts: not necessarily above everyone else, but...separate.) Yes, CM Punk has been back full-time for about two months now, been in featured matches on three PPVs since his three-month break after Wrestlemania. But his feud with Paul Heyman hasn’t really intersected with anything else going on.

    And that’s just fine, because the leader of what Grantland’s brilliant David Shoemaker  dubbed “The Reality Era” in 2011 has stepped aside from the counterculture, revolutionary role for the time being. No, what CM Punk is embroiled in is good, old-fashioned, old-school wrestling hatred. He was involved in one of the greatest Summerslam matches of all-time last night (upon a second viewing, I may be convinced to remove the “Summerslam” qualifier), with a major mainstream star in Brock Lesnar, and somehow the brutality Lesnar brought at him was secondary to his seething hatred of Paul Heyman.

    Punk fought the machine for nearly two years. Now he just wants to rip apart his former best friend. Much like with Bryan, we kind of already know the ending. It’s how we get there that matters. In this case, it’s a wrestler against a fat, slovenly manager who isn’t even a former wrestler. Yeah, we want to see Punk get his hands on Heyman and rip him apart. And we’re fairly sure we will. The brawl with Curtis Axel was as logical a starting point as any- if only anyone cared about Axel, or his title- but assuming we’re headed for a Wrestlemania rematch with Lesnar (which would make sense, because unlike with HHH that’s a rematch and a conqueror of Lesnar we actually want to see) that’s a lot of time in-between for Punk to have to fill. Some sort of prolonged absence would make a lot of sense for him here, except there’s an enormous top babyface void right now and Punk already had one long absence this year. The more logical next step seems to be that Punk destroys Axel and gets to Heyman, leading to a prolonged absence for Heyman, before he brings back Brock for retribution.

    On another note, find me another wrestler alive who can cut a scathing promo on a fan as a babyface, AND BE A BIGGER BABYFACE AS A RESULT. If anyone was in attendance, was this some dude who was just being an unbearably obnoxious asshole?

On stables ripping off ideas from FX shows, and others just taking the names of them...

    Given all the things we know to be true about wrestling’s weird code of ethics, it’s not that hard to believe that Abrose, Reigns and Rollins were being punished for whatever perceived backstage slights to their elders, or for injuring a brittle 50-year old man in a match he probably shouldn’t even have wrestled. No one ever said this was a business filled by intellectual superpowers.

    That said, their actual in-ring work of late has reeked of three dudes who got too much, too soon and started to believe their own hype. We see it all the time in real sports and other forms of entertainment, and wrestling isn’t immune to the disease, either. For all the deserved blue-chipper status they received even before their debuts, for all the awesome, borderline terrorist camcorder promos in the bowels of arenas, for all the main event storylines they were immediately thrust into, the backbone of The Shield early on was the crazy, manic, ROH-meets-Attitude Era blue collar in-ring work. They’ve lost that edge in recent weeks, very much acting like three guys- not the characters, the actual performers- who think just showing up, looking cool and swaggering around is enough.

    As much as I enjoy seeing them reinserted into main event storylines- even if beating dudes up three-on-one isn’t that impressive compared to their separate-and-destroy matches against three men earlier in their run- I enjoy seeing them regain their focus even more. I don’t particularly care for them as HHH’s personal security detail, but it could extend the gimmick’s life span by a few months. Ambrose is ready now to break out on his own, but I’m not sure I feel the same about Reigns or Rollins.

    Meanwhile, after a disappointing Summerslam match, I was fine with Bray Wyatt getting a convincing squash over a “name” guy. In what’s becoming a running theme, I hope they know what step two is. Step one: awesome gimmick/intro upon their debut. Step three: Bray Wyatt is a huge, huge star. How are we getting there? It’s easy to see them start to spin their wheels. And for the love of Christ, does anyone give a shit where Kane is? THEY FUCKING STOLE THE DUDE. Anyone looking into this?

    (The first part of this headline refers to the Wyatt family clearly being modeled after the Crowders on “Justified.”)

Hey, look who has stuff to do!

    Namely, lots of people. Is Vince Russo back on the payroll? Because we have a lot of midcarders doing really stupid stuff. But that’s better than doing nothing. Ryback beating up nerds? OK, at least he’s doing something. Fandango dancing his way through others’ backstage skits? I don’t know why, but I’m getting a kick out of it. That’s probably what the character should have done to begin with. He also had, hands down, the line of the night: “Those right there are beautiful sneakers...but can I dance in them?” Comic gold. More of that from Fandango. I don’t know if you can do a parody of something that’s been around so little time so far, but I like it.

Well, we’ll see how it plays in SEC country....

    But damn, how about the face reaction for Darren Young? I think they went about what to do with him, at least in week one, about as well as could be hoped for. Sure, the PTPers suddenly being faces makes no fucking sense, but no matter. Colter’s promo vaguely alluding to the headlines of Young coming out but then launching right back into an anti-immigrant diatribe also made no sense. Presenting the PTPers exactly as they were before, but in a situation in which we’d want to cheer for them without beating us over the head with the actual headline? A nice way to capitalize on some positive mainstream attention without being pandering or cloying.

I guess most drug counselors ARE former users....

    What, Ricardo is back from a drug suspension, and the idea is to have him hang out with someone who (and I can’t prove this...but come on, it’s probably true) wears ring gear made out of hemp? No matter, RVD and Ricardo is a fun, nonsensical pairing and it works for me as the next challenger for Del Rio. Fuck it, put the belt on Rob. His ring work has been pretty good since returning to WWE and he’s over as ever. It’s not like that belt matters anyway.

Comments

  1. Very much dig this.

    ReplyDelete
  2. davidbonzaisaldanamontgomeryAugust 20, 2013 at 1:51 AM

    To quote one of my favorite SNL skits (Superfans): "I like Mears! MEARS! MEARS!"

    ReplyDelete
  3. I like this one better than the others. More of this!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Victor Rodriguez JrAugust 20, 2013 at 2:14 AM

    loved this.


    At the very least i'd like to see this AND the classic play by play rant posted.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Good stuff. Hope it becomes a regular thing.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I like the writing, but I feel your thoughts should mimic the structure of the show. By all means skip things you don't like (eg. "there was a match with the Miz facing 3mb, Miz won."), but I think there has to be some sort of recap element otherwise it's just a stream of conciousness opinion piece which isn't that different to what everyone posts in the comments of this blog.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I much prefer this to the usual style of "reviewing" shows as you're actually giving thoughts about it, not just summarizing it.

    A little feedback: if you included a summary of the show right at the start, not a detailed run down, just a who fought who and who spoke to who thing, it would give people who didn't watch the show a better framework to understand your thoughts.

    Also, I also feel like you're missing a paragraph giving us concluding thoughts on the show. Did you think it was good or bad? There's no place where I can easily find that.

    But what you've got here is a good start, I hope you develop your style further.

    ReplyDelete
  8. They used to do RAWtopsy (or however it was spelled on 411)


    Outside of the fact it was too wordy, it was good.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I generally agree with this. I'm not saying it's bad but I don't watch Raw so my preference is more recap.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Totally agree. I told Scott I think this will work better in conjunction with someone else doing a more traditional review, rather than as a replacement.

    ReplyDelete
  11. In my defense on the wordiness, I actually compared the word count to one of the tryout reviews and it was 1,300 fewer words. But it was also a totally different style, and I get what you mean. If I do this regularly, it won't be this long. Self-editing has never been a strong suit of mine as a writer (I'm good at editing/copy editing others' work, though) but consider this a prototype.

    ReplyDelete
  12. no need to defend yourself.


    i said it was good

    ReplyDelete
  13. I know, much appreciated. I'm just sensitive to the charge of wordiness because like I said, self-editing is a weakness of mine. Were I ever to do this for real I'd get a legit editor (or at least an old journalism school buddy willing to help out) to keep my long-winded ass in check.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I intentionally left both of those things- a summary of everything and my overall good/bad thoughts- out because I wanted it to be totally different than Scott's style of review. Someone else can do that, and should. If Scott's willing to post two different-style postmortems of Raw every week, I think he absolutely should.


    That said, I realize not everyone who reads these watches the show, so that kind of limits the appeal for those looking for a Smark Rant replacement. I also realized this didn't exactly turn out to be what I wanted it to be. Having re-read it a few times, I'm not unhappy with it. I was hoping it would be more (and I feel between posting about it in other threads and e-mailing this to Scott I'm starting to sound like someone going from studio to studio making a movie pitch) sporting event postgame article meets AV Club episode review. But I found that hard to do for a show so fragmented like Raw, with so many different moving parts that don't have much, if anything to do with each other.

    ReplyDelete
  15. So where does the punk/heyman feud go from here? Punk just convincingly beat up Axel while selling a beating from last night, thus thoroughly burying Axel (for no real purpose) and making a feud between the two of them totally one sided. So is there a new Heyman guy coming? If so, who? Ryback? He's really the only guy I can see on that level that's free.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Oh and gotta love how much heat The Shield has with the office by their push being curtailed. Meltzer really has his finger on the pulse! L to the O to the L!

    ReplyDelete
  17. Judging by the South Park reference being a running theme, my vote for a column name is "First You Collect The Underpants"

    ReplyDelete
  18. Scott, this Mears post is good and should be a regular feature if he's willing. However, I (and I'm sure other BoDers) read the Raw rants because they missed the show. If you could find a good sequential play by play review and supplement it with this, it would be great.

    ReplyDelete
  19. You're spot on about how much this plays off our own insecurities as Smarks, which is probably why I've been so invested in this angle.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Good question. The obvious choice was RVD but it seems they're going a different direction with him. Axel is trying my patience already in this role.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Completely agree. We need more wrestling writing like this, but some of us don't watch the show regularly. I'd read both.

    ReplyDelete
  22. This was great. Very unique. I like it.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Great first post, Mike. I hope Scott gives you another shot.

    ReplyDelete
  24. RVD was too over as a face to pull the trigger on that just yet. I think they'll just stick with Punk basically squashing Axel for now until they find another Heyman lackey. By Survivor Series or so, I expect Punk to be pulled away from the Heyman angle for a bit and be inserted in the Bryan angle in some way.

    ReplyDelete
  25. This is good but you should play with the format so the review follows the format of the show

    ReplyDelete
  26. I endorse this guy's column, great read.

    ReplyDelete
  27. This was an excellent article. I like the concept, and I like the more formal style of writing you bring to the blog.

    In my opinion, it needs to be just a smudge shoter. But honestly, that's my only qualm.
    Great stuff, and I would read this every week.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Charismatic e-Negro Jef VinsonAugust 20, 2013 at 7:49 AM

    This was a cool change of pace.

    ReplyDelete
  29. I'm kind of disappointed they didn't let Bryan get an Austin-like
    revenge on the new McMahon faction to stoke the fire of the feud. It
    would have catapulted him even further into superstardom if it was so
    kick-ass, it's played over and over over the years. But I think it'll be
    difficult for Daniel to ever get one over on HHH since he's virtually
    invulnerable unless wrestling a big dude like Brock or Taker.



    One thing that could be interesting to see is who does Bryan get as his
    back-up. He's up against the McMahons and now the Shield. So does that
    mean Ziggler, Mark Henry and Big Show since they've got issues with the
    Shield now? My pick? Maybe an uneasy alliance with the Wyatt Family. Not
    only because of the beard connection but because to beat the McMahons,
    Daniel has to go with "crazy" (remember, crazy always beats strong in a
    fight). Plus it would help the Wyatts get over to be paired with the
    company's most over guy. And if Daniel wins the title, Bray can always turn on him and become a new contender.



    Imagine a brawl to end RAW where Daniel Bryan gets beat up again by the
    Shield and Randy Orton until the Wyatts of all people come down for the save as a
    horrified and furious Vince, Stephanie and HHH watch.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Yeah, Axel should have pillmanized him last night.

    ReplyDelete
  31. I think Ziggler will definitely be involved...that is clear from all the tweeting stuff and the Shield punishment. I love the Wyatt angle, but maybe that comes later when Bryan is desperate?

    ReplyDelete
  32. Yes this Shield de-push has been fascinating to watch.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Would've really gotten Axel back on track.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Lets see. They never lose, beat up top guys all the time and are portrayed as intimidating killers. What awful treatment!

    ReplyDelete
  35. I am, in fact, distantly related to the Mears racing family.
    As a Bears fan, I both love and hate the Superfans.

    ReplyDelete
  36. I like this but I feel like it could be better organized.



    /feedback

    ReplyDelete
  37. I hope you're right. I actually like the way I structured it, but hopefully it'll get a bit sharper. Appreciate the feedback.

    ReplyDelete
  38. I agree, Ryback makes the most sense to be the next Heyman guy. He's finally built a character with all the backstage bully vignettes (which I personally think have been great for what they are), has an intimidating presence, and can point back to all the times he had Punk beat last year if it wasn't for Heyman. (So now with Heyman in HIS corner, Ryback should be unbeatable.)



    So yeah, Ryback is the perfect guy actually.


    That said, I'd still bet it's Punk vs Axel for the IC title at Night of Champions, with Punk winning the belt. To be honest, Axel looked more like a badass than he ever had before last night, and I would bet that he gets the upper hand on Punk next week.



    Last night was probably a matter of WWE not wanting to book Bryan AND Punk, who have the same fanbase, to take vicious beatdowns on the same show.

    ReplyDelete
  39. I thought it was a good read, I enjoy musings rather than straightforward review, good job buddy

    ReplyDelete
  40. Nice review man, I'd definitely read more.


    So something that I think we've all overlooked on account of the huge Bryan/Corporation and Punk/Heyman storylines last night... what about RVD challenging Del Rio?


    Personally I love this idea. (And yeah, I know, I'm pretty much onboard with everything they're doing right now. I think the product is on fire in a way it hasn't been in God knows when.) RVD is so goddamn over right now they absolutely have to capitalize, and hell, he's in great shape and still bringing it in the ring. I'd wager he beats Del Rio at NoC and headlines Smackdown as the top face (remember, there's no Sheamus or Orton there anymore) through the Fall, before putting over Sandow at some point. And honestly, I'm down with that. We've never gotten a true RVD run on top, he's been gone for awhile and feels fresh, and it's always fun to watch a babyface champ that's actually over and putting on great matches.



    I hope they pull the trigger. PLUS pairing him with Ricardo should be really ridiculous and fun, in a way that Attitude era shit was ridiculous and fun.

    ReplyDelete
  41. He shouldn't get Austin-like revenge on night 1 of the feud. I mean, Triple H and Orton JUST turned heel the night before. For the majority of the audience (people who didn't order Summerslam), this would be the first heel thing they've seen either guy do in years. WWE HAS to put some heel heat on the Corporation for this thing to mean anything.

    I definitely think Bryan is gonna get his "beer truck" moments in the near future— hell, I bet part of this will be building to the spot where Bryan hits the knockout FUCK YOU knee on HHH's face, which could be his "Austin stuns Vince in MSG" moment. But they can't do that shit on Night 1.

    ReplyDelete
  42. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WZLPaT2z05w&feature=youtu.be&t=6m24s



    CHECK THAT OUT GUYS! AWESOME USE OF CONTINUATION!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  43. I hear ya but I think HHH and Orton could have gotten their heat on Bryan in the weeks leading to the next PPV event. I'm not saying that Daniel gets his full revenge on Night 1 but maybe something smaller to show that the "little guy" isn't going to take what happened to him lying down.

    See, my fear is that this is going to turn into a Chris Jericho vs. HHH/DX thing in 2000 where Daniel just gets his ass continually handed to him until Vince and Co. give up on him and put Randy in a feud against Big Show or Ryback.

    ReplyDelete
  44. I dunno, I always see the Wyatts as Swamp People + Manson Family, not necessarily the Crowders. Good thought though.

    ReplyDelete
  45. Glad to hear someone else is enjoying the latest twist on Ryback. He is showing some personality, and I have liked what I have seen.

    ReplyDelete
  46. Chris Jericho in 2000 had people- like HHH- actively working against him. Daniel Bryan in 2013 has the support of, like, everyone whose opinion matters. Jericho had pissed some people off in his first few months and right or wrong, had to convince the powers-that-be that he actually knew how to work. (And he admitted himself that he had trouble adapting to the WWF style at first.)

    ReplyDelete
  47. It's certainly a possibility.

    But on the other hand, he's not Austin. He has a different personality and style. If he had run in and laid waste like Austin did, people would complain that they're trying to make him something he isn't, and trying to just rehash the Austin/McMahon feud.

    Which some people are saying anyway - but while the overall story is similar, at least so far the details are different. Bryan's a different kind of face, and HHH/Steph's condescending "we like you, you're just not main event material" attitude is a different twist on the evil boss. In part because it's playing off of 'smart' attitudes and expectations.

    But...it is night 1. I think it got off to a promising start - but so far that's all it is. There's plenty of time to mess it up, there's plenty of time to turn it into something memorable.

    ReplyDelete
  48. I say rehash the shit out of it. It's been 15 years. The polar opposite nature of the Stone Cold and Daniel Bryan characters will make it different enough right there even if you're following the same basic script.

    ReplyDelete
  49. I'd be shocked, honestly shocked, if this heads in that direction.


    First off, yeah this is still Triple H the Ultimate Dickhead, but the guy owns the company now. It's not about him protecting his spot as a wrestler now, it's about him making sure the company keeps printing money for him and his family. ANd in that regard, I can't imagine even he'd be dumb enough to kill off the absolute most popular guy in teh company. Bryan winning this feud is where teh money is and they know it.


    Secondly, Bryan went over John Cena. 100% squeky clean. And then Cena came out and basically passed the goddamn torch to Bryan. It can't be underestimated how huge this is, and there's no way that they do that unless it's because they see Bryan as a top money superface.



    Lastly, I don't think for a second they give a shit about protecting Randy Orton in this feud. He's the PERFECT guy to be in this spot, because he has tons of main event credibility, he's a perfect bland cypher for the McMahons, but at the same time... it's 2-strike Randy who's been around forever and who otherwise had outlived his main event usefulness. He's totally there to put Bryan over in the end.


    Also, one other thing: the Meltzer rumors had been that they want Austin vs HHH at Mania. This storyline sets that up PERFECTLY, with Austin doing a repeat of his role in the "Mick Foley wins his first title" match to help Bryan defeat the Corporation.


    If they can't get Austin, then Rock makes perfect sense in that role. Either way, what I'm saying is that the end game is that the faces win in the end. I'd be shocked if that's not where it ends up.

    ReplyDelete
  50. Exactly. Daniel Bryan in 2013 is a million times bigger star, in the company's eyes, than 2000 Chris Jericho ever was.

    ReplyDelete
  51. It's fun, old fashioned wrestling stuff. It's the Million Dollar Man kicking the kid's basketball, or Mr. Perfect catching passes from himself.



    Ryback's bully vignettes, or Fandango dancing through a Foot Locker commercial, or Bray Wyatt cutting Manson promos from a rocking chair— that's the kind of periphery shit that makes wrestling characters.

    ReplyDelete
  52. Scream09_HartKillerAugust 20, 2013 at 9:49 AM

    The impression I'm getting is that they're trying to really, really drive home the underdog point by throwing shit after shit after shit on him - from Stephanie verbally putting him down, to Triple H taunting him, to him having to fight the Shield just to get in the ring, to finally managing to get to the ring and stagger in only to get drilled with an RKO - it's burying him, knowing that it'll make the fans support him more.

    ReplyDelete
  53. This is a lot of work for each show. I hope you don't feel the need to try to top yourself. Anyway, this was excellent.

    ReplyDelete
  54. I appreciate it.
    I don't yet know if I'm going to do this weekly, or if Scott will even want me to. I might make it monthly or more sporadic, whenever there's an angle to write about instead of trying to use this format on a weekly TV show.
    If I were to do it regularly, it'd obviously get easier and easier. I took notes as I watched this week and realized I probably used less than 10 percent of them. I could probably write some of this as I'm watching the show.

    ReplyDelete
  55. Really good work. This is much faster-paced and more straight to the point than a routine play-by-play review would have been. Good job, Mike.

    ReplyDelete
  56. Wyatt's cannot be face right now.

    ReplyDelete
  57. I'd like to echo the sentiment someone mentioned elsewhere, that this could be an interesting time to let the Shield progress toward bad-ass faces alligned with Bryan. They don't have to act any differently, but they could emphasize the whole "justice" thing and back up Bryan's battle with the new Corporation. Ambrose is a natural heel and I think we could eventually get back there, with him turning and feuding with Bryan, Punk, etc. But I think Bryan will need SOME sort of reinforcements and the Shield is could make another jump by raging against the Corporate machine

    ReplyDelete
  58. I was kinda hoping theyd stay "corporate mercaneries." Youre right, it doesn't really fit into their mission statement of "justice" but I think if they tweaked this they could be great in this scenario. Then in a few months have one or the stable break off into a face role.

    ReplyDelete
  59. I dig. This would be a more than welcome weekly read.

    ReplyDelete
  60. For what it's worth, I absolutely loved this.

    I've always said that I'm more into the "entertainment" than the "sports" part of pro-wrestling (which, by its nature, is what separates it from real sports), and musing on things like subtext and story possibilities is a great interest of mine. I found your takes on things like the meta-McMahons and the disjointed Wyatt push to be well thought out and entertaining.

    Here's hoping for more of these. Great work.

    (I also enjoyed this other two "try-outs, but this wad certainly more unique.

    ReplyDelete
  61. davidbonzaisaldanamontgomeryAugust 21, 2013 at 1:12 AM

    Oh, no shit! That's crazy.

    ReplyDelete
  62. This was my favorite of the 3 tryouts. I found it to be a more enjoyable read than an itemized review. My only real gripe is that it jumps all over the place as far as when things occurred on the show versus where they are placed in the review. I think correcting that may satisfy those who are looking for a more traditional style Rant.

    ReplyDelete
  63. I did that because I wanted to write it kind of inverted pyramid style. Covering it sequentially could, depending on said sequence of events, bury the lede. I was intentionally trying to do a drastically different style from what Scott does.

    ReplyDelete
  64. I actually enjoy the wrestling and the storylines equally, but I find the story more interesting to write about.

    ReplyDelete
  65. I see what you're saying, I just don't know how well that style translates to reviewing a show that's in a sequential format. I still liked it nonetheless though.

    ReplyDelete
  66. This was great. My only "complaint" would be that your paragraph titles/lead-ins should be bolded or underlined, or set apart from the other text in some way. Otherwise, fantastic stuff, the tone and attitude of the piece was spot-on, and I look forward to next week.

    ReplyDelete
  67. They were bolded in the document I sent Scott, but that was also some free knockoff Word program I quickly downloaded when I realized I hadn't re-downloaded Word after my buddy fixed my crashed laptop earlier this summer (I haven't been using my laptop for work anyway, so it hadn't crossed my until I actually needed it for this).
    So I don't know if that's why it didn't show up as bolded, or what.

    ReplyDelete
  68. Much appreciated. If I do this as a weekly thing I really hope someone's still doing a tradtional Raw review. For those that just want a straightforward, dry review of what happened, from start to finish....this isn't going to be that. Like I said in the disclaimer at the top, this is going to assume one has seen the show, hence the postgame, big-picture analysis rather than straightforward recap.

    ReplyDelete
  69. I'm coming around on the idea of them as HHH's security detail. It's better than wrestling the fucking Usos in good-but-who-gives-a-shit PPV preshow matches or the middle of the second hour of Raw.
    That said, within a few months I could absolutely see them turning face in the way ATL2013 described. The idea of an uneasy alliance with the Wyatts a bit down the road for DB also intrigues me, but they haven't been around long enough for that quite yet. The Shield? They have, and can you imagine the pop if The Shield came out to help Bryan after tiring of being HHH's lackeys for several months? Better reinforce the roof, because it's otherwise getting blown off.

    ReplyDelete
  70. Ah, I gotcha. Either way, I enjoyed the hell out of it.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment