Skip to main content

The Postgame: 9-9-13

YES! ....and No.


“Here’s the thing they don’t understand: there is satisfaction in the struggle," Daniel Bryan said in the opening segment, hosted by a SyFy show-promoting Edge. "Because I know no matter how many times Randy Orton attacks me from behind, no matter how many times The Shield triple powerbombs me, no matter how many knockout punches I eat from giants, and no matter how many times Triple H tries to hold me down, I will beat Randy Orton, I will regain the title, and I will be the WWE champion! YES!”





It was another excellent promo in a summer full of them from Bryan, and elegance of the "satisfaction in the struggle" line in particular crystallized not only his motivation, but why it's OK that this isn't quite like Austin v. McMahon:

Because Daniel Bryan isn't Stone Cold. And Triple H isn't Vince McMahon. Austin and Vince were cartoon characters. Yes, Austin was portrayed as the "everyman," and Vince was playing off his real-life owner status. But Austin wasn't an everyman. He was John McClane or Jack Bauer with a Texas twang. And while Vince was playing the role of himself, it was obviously a highly caricatured version of it. As I've said before, Bryan and Triple H are playing believable versions of themselves that exist on that thin line that separates real from "real."

So it worked for Bryan to get beaten down on seven straight shows. Look at your own reaction, you jaded, snarky smark! You were getting legitimately upset that they were ending every show with Bryan getting screwed over and beaten down. When was the last time they've been able to establish this level of heel heat with no ironic, detached cheering from the meta section of the fanbase? It's nuclear. Bryan is, at worst, equally as over as Punk. And you could easily argue it's much bigger than that, that these are the biggest, purely visceral face reactions since Austin and Rock's heyday.

But...is a long-term, slow burn to an epic Bryan/HHH match at Wrestlemania XXX going to make for must-see, monthly PPVs? On the show where they did more to establish Orton as a viably dominant heel champion than at any other point in the last month- as opposed to merely Triple H's avatar- it happened to be the show in which Bryan needed to get a modicum of momentum back. Frankly, it would have been interesting to see Bryan never get the upper hand, and still get screwed at Night of Champions.

Now it seems highly telegraphed that Bryan, with his momentum back heading into the big show, will again get screwed. (With nowhere else to put this, let's make the perfunctory but necessary note that Bryan/Ambrose was, as you'd expect, very good, probably somewhere in the ***1/4-ish range; however, something was clearly and rightfully left on the table for when they inevitably have a one-on-one PPV match, much like the Punk/Bryan TV affairs of 2012.) And, if this is going to be as slow of a burn, as long of a con, as it looks like...shouldn't he?

It makes for a terrific long-term storyline if it ends with the heels getting their comeuppance. (Though we're all aware that for whatever reason- and the reason doesn't matter, because you're going to choose whatever reason fits the narrative you want for the polarizing figure that is Paul Levesque- that the heel getting his comeuppance isn't a guarantee in a Triple H storyline).

But it's unclear, despite Bryan's brilliance and Orton turning in the best work of his career, if it's going to make for must-see pay per view on a monthly basis.

From Killer to Kitsch

The Punk/Heyman/Axel storyline....I'm enjoying watching it, I guess is the best I can say? What started out as a vicious blood feud that Axel's involvement as Heyman's heavy was deemed as tolerable has devolved into kitschy, campy silliness. 

It seems like it's a necessary development, because Axel has been exposed as woefully unready for this level. One almost wishes this was the time that Punk could have taken off, instead of earlier in the year, savaged by Brock Lesnar's brutal Summerslam beating in their all-time classic. In the meantime, maybe they could have taken actual steps to get Axel ready on a personal performance level- and establish him more on a storyline level- to do this part of the story at a time closer to Lesnar's return to build to a Wrestlemania rematch.

As it stands, it seems like there's too much time and not enough important things that can happen in this story between now and Lesnar's return. While it's rare to have this much long-term focus in what are normally lean fall months, I'm fearful they'll get restless without enough compelling television to bridge the long gaps between now and what could be an epic Wrestlemania buildup in both of their top storylines. 

Is Depth Overrated? 

Sorry, it isn't college basketball season yet. That's when I make the argument against the importance of depth. (Which isn't to say you can't run a team off the floor with the right kind of depth, but few teams recruit enough really good players to do that. And I digress, fully aware how few of you probably give a shit about college basketball.) In professional wrestling? Yeah, it kind of is. 

Having a huge storyline establishing a guy who hits the trifecta of being massively over with everyone/IWC darling/elite worker as your tippy-top guy is terrific. Using big (no pun intended) players like Big Show and midding players like the Rhodes brothers to supplement it is smart. Having a storyline with your other top babyface that exists in its own world separate from the other goings-on is also shrewd, giving us something else that matters in an exhausting three-hour show. (I know I'm reviewing it, but sorry, the fast-forward button is still getting used. Those who do the tedious labor of detailing every last segment are doing saintly work, but that'll never be me. It's three fucking hours. I'm not pretending every segment deserves our time, or our thoughts.) 

But while it's given Show, Rhodes and The Shield a purpose and an important spot on the card, it's leaving players like Dolph Ziggler, Bray Wyatt, Ryback, Alberto Del Rio and Rob Van Dam toiling in garbage minutes. Regardless of what your opinion may be on any of these peformers individually, there is no doubt that they've seen diminished roles in recent weeks as the focus has been on a huge, star-making storyline. We aren't getting an opportunity to find out if Bray Wyatt can work. And it's early; he has time. But that was a lot of buildup to simply let them kind of exist, and grow into their own in time. Dolph Ziggler was almost as on fire as a new, main event babyface as Daniel Bryan a few months ago, and now he's jobbing nearly clean to Wyatt in nothing matches. 

Meanwhile, I almost forgot Del Rio and RVD were having a title match on Sunday. We spent their buildup seeing ADR beat R-Truth for what seems like the 85th time (in reality, I don't even remember if they've wrestled each other at all; what's important is it SEEMS like we've pointlessly seen it that many times) and RVD's momentum-building into NoC consist of being fodder for the furthering of Ryback's bully character. Is there no one RVD couldn't have gotten a win over going into the PPV? Is there no one expendable for Ryback to have shoved around? Couldn't we have gotten a heated, pull-apart brawl between Del Rio and Van Dam to even pretend like they want us to care about that match? Listen, whoever's buying this show is doing so for Orton/Bryan and maybe to see if Punk tears Heyman apart, but at least pretend there's something else you want us to part with our money over. 

You've Still Got It

Now, THAT'S building some heel heat. Hats off to Goldust for putting his working boots on to the tune of a legitimately great TV match with Randy Orton. It accomplished multiple goals: it put the focus back on Randy Orton as a killer heel- even subtly alluding to his Legend Killer past without anyone saying a word about it- heading into the PPV, it built even more heat for the new Corporation, it gave us our requisite good, long match to kill a chunk of these interminable three hours, and it also built heat for a fascinating sub-story with Cody Rhodes. Even if it's left too many guys with too little of import to do, if the McMahons and HHH take a personal involvement in a story you know it's going to get their full attention.

There are plenty of semi-legends who are still spry enough to fill the roles that Edge and Goldust filled this week: give us someone for Randy Orton to destroy, someone for Triple H to step on verbally who doesn't need to worry about getting heat back. This is where we could have used a Kevin Nash fall cameo. This is where Mick Foley's supposed real life heat with Levesque could play out on the meta level. This- as Edge referred to- is a spot for Chris Jericho's next comeback to have some meaning. 

So we head into a traditionally lifeless September show with one more major storyline worth caring about than we usually have this time of year, but little certainty that it will manifest itself in a show anyone actually needs to see. 

See you next week on the Postgame.







Comments

  1. This is something that Stephanie, as head writer, has never really wrapped her head around: she has a great idea for the top story and puts everything into that, and it hurts everyone not involved because they don't get any attention. How Punk has managed to be the exception to this is uncertain, but I'm willing to bet he and Paul Heyman are given time and the instruction to get over, with no other clarification. As it is, it's a shame that Dolph Ziggler, who seemed to be a major part of the story, now is going nowhere and putting over Bray Wyatt, who -- and I can't believe I'm saying this -- gets more over by NOT wrestling than he does by wrestling.

    ReplyDelete
  2. raw is so much more fucking enjoyable without cena

    ReplyDelete
  3. i liked the feeling that the top angle reached down and affected even the jobbiest of jobbers, and ziggler (though of course not technically jobbiest of jobbers) was a big part of that. it gave the entire show a sense of purpose and believe it or not actually makes the 3 hrs more bearable



    i was convinced theyd do ziggler/ambrose for the us title at the ppv, but i guess not unless something happens on sd

    ReplyDelete
  4. It would've been so easy for Ziggler to have also gotten a Cody-esque push via this big Bryan/McMaHHHons angle. Simply have Dolph 'break ranks' in the very first week and try to attack the Shield, leaving Dolph fired. His logic in doing so would've been something like, "I'm the best talent on RAW, no way they'll leave me unemployed," which plays into his Showoff persona. Then in the ensuing weeks, have Dolph "buy TV time" on Raw and cut promos in 30-second spots. It'd be an easy way to let him build his face persona so when he finally did re-emerge in the ring, he'd be super over.

    ReplyDelete
  5. My biggest problem is how they handle the bit players in this angle. Because despite how much Keller and his kids whine about it, this angle is hot and everyone knows it. The bit players who even briefly come into contact with it get elevated. Miz had his Miz TV segment on Smackdown and got more over as a face than he had in his whole face turn just by having HHH crap on the last 2 years of his career and having a decent to good match with Orton. Cody Rhodes is more interesting a character now than he's probably ever been before and I'm including his heel run when it looked like he was almost going to break through.

    WWE has to notice this. But the most involved character outside of the primary characters (Bryan, HHH, Orton, Shield, basically in that order) is a guy who needs no help whatsoever, the Big Show.

    Why can't Dolph or Miz or Kofi or Truth or any of the mid-card faces who have nothing going on step up and be a part of the angle. I get that when Show loses it and punches out HHH is going to be a huge pop. But why waste that on the only one who doesn't need it.

    ReplyDelete
  6. That spot is Show's because he can pull it off. Of course he doesn't need it, but he is really good at it. Truth and Miz suck, Kofi is meh, and Dolph wouldn't work because it doesn't fit his character. He gives zero fucks about everything.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I doubt Stephanie has anything to do with this storyline, this is Vince and HHH's baby.

    ReplyDelete
  8. How amazing would it be if the next few PPVs featured Punk essentially needing to sell his soul to get his hands on Lesnar and Heyman again. Triple H says if he wants his rematch, he NEEDs to beat Daniel Bryan in a best of...5 series or something. Friend against friend, that sort of thing.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Bravo, Mike.

    What I appreciate about you is that you're actually recapping the product for what it is - or rather, the important segments - and that is a show which has a worth greater than the sum of its parts.


    Wrestling fans are fed with so much shit by WWE that when they finally strike gold, their taste buds are as useless as Kevin Nash's quads. They only remember what quality was like before it turned Cena-- I mean, sour, so they yearn for the past.

    Yes, Bryan/HHH is an iteration of Austin/McMahon, but they're different characters and thus the dynamic is different. But of course, people can't help but bitching about the few good things on a three-hour show. I can understand if people can't last three hours because over half of it blows, but if you watch the whole thing (which people quite clearly do, check the live threads) and then bitch then you probably don't have good taste or decency to begin with.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Except that involves Dolph cutting promos. Which has been proven to not get him over. In fact...it gets him less over.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I hate how protected Big Show is, but you're right. He's the only guy that can pull this angle off.


    But I would in fact say that's a good bit of evidence to put in the "Dolph sucks" camp.


    Look, I enjoy Dolph's ringwork and I found his heel stuff endearing. But his complete ability to make himself in anyway likable, or even get himself over a face (for brief periods of time) without shameless, soulless pandering is going to make him a perennial B-player.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I know nobody cares about female wrestling, but I actually sat through that segment. And boy is WWE absolutely clueless on what they're trying to do.


    AJ cuts her promo like a heel (in terms of vocal inflection and tone) but says face shit. She mocks the commentators, but they respond with Lawler calling her ugly, and JBL asking if she's jealous. And when AJ responds with "I'm the champ, what reason do I have to be jealous?" they basically laugh at her and call her nuts.


    AJ's still enough of a stuck-up bitch with a chip on her shoulder to be heel. But the face alternative seems to be creepy old men who say incredibly sexist shit with no respect for the art form we're paying (well, supposed to be paying) for.


    AJ got a tattoo to commemorate her title win, and I think we're supposed to boo her for that.


    Fuck me I don't know.

    ReplyDelete
  13. That's the beauty of this angle: the wealth can be spread over so many things.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Christ I love this type of analysis of Raw--great stuff Mike.

    Daniel Bryan is getting close to '96 HBK for me--stepping into the ring at anytime almost guarantees ***+

    ReplyDelete
  15. I don't think the issue is even so much that Show is in the role, just that he's the ONLY one in the role. Yes, we're waiting for Show to snap and pledge allegiance to Bryan, but the company has seemingly already dropped the other guys that were going to be a part of it (Miz and Dolph originally, and maybe Kofi if last week's "Smackdown" was any sort of indicator).


    Maybe it's because I'm actually a fan of Show, but he's perfect for the role - he's the giant teddy-bear that Trips is getting off on manipulating, Trips KNOWS that Show could rip him to shreds, but is enjoying being able to boss this much bigger guy around. That dynamic means that the audience is just waiting for Show to actually do what we all know he's capable of: rip Trips to shreds. Couple that with the fact that Show is a pretty good actor by pro-wrestling standards (even if the constant crying is a big much), and it's easy to see why the role isn't just something that anyone could fill, but rather something tailor made to Show's strengths and abilities.


    That said, two guys against the establishment isn't going to be enough, this SHOULD be leading to an army of disgruntled employees rising up against the oppressive upper-crust, and any glimmer of whom that army may be (Miz, Dolph, Kofi, RVD) has already been thrown away. Sure, it's probably only temporarily, we'll get our "army" eventually, it'll probably be those already named, but it would seem to make more sense if we got to see the potential members slowly make the legitimately huge decision to put their own security on the line to do what's right. If I were in the same position, would I risk losing my job just to tell my boss that he's wrong? Probably not, and that's what could make it such a great dramatic story. At the moment, we're missing out on seeing what kind of morals and conviction these guys actually have, missing out on watching them weigh the pros and cons, trying to decide if helping Bryan is worth not bringing home the big paychecks for their families, or even if it's just worth giving up their dream jobs (since their dream jobs have - or could - become nightmares).


    They're doing it with Cody, let's hope they do it with a few others.

    ReplyDelete
  16. I agree that promos aren't Dolph's strong point, but Buster's idea could still work - just instead of Dolph saying what a great talent he is, the other wrestlers could say it. Just have Bryan or Show point out what a waste of talent it is to have Ziggler sitting at home.

    ReplyDelete
  17. I watched a few minutes of Raw last night for the first time since WM - Goldust put my ass in the seat, BTW. I saw most of the Goldust - Orton match, and most of the main event and they were both great matches. I might watch a bit again next week.

    Great article, incidentally.

    ReplyDelete
  18. First time reader of "The Postgame"...


    This is an awesome read, great stuff.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Just some smart mark fantasy booking that gets one of my favs on TV: Edge comes out and continues his tirade about HHH being terrible at his choices regarding talent. HHH comes out and tells him he couldn't do any better, and Edge brings out Canada's own (while still in Canada where he's getting good reactions) Sami Zayn! Then, Zayn can tag with Christian as Edge's avatar. Maybe Smackdown we get Shield vs Christian/Sami.

    ReplyDelete
  20. I will never understand someone who sits through all 3 hours and 15 minutes of Raw. I'm a much more optimistic/positive fan of today's WWE than most people here and I've watched Raw live maybe 2 times in the past 5 years. It's way too much of a chore to watch everything, especially knowing that the technology exists for me to skip commercials/fluff. So it boggles my mind that people who are clearly more cynical/snarky than me choose to watch it like this.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Everyone has heard Einstein's quote that insanity is 'doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results'.

    Watching Raw is insanity.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Did you fail to mention SANTINO?

    ReplyDelete
  23. AJ is the heel in this feud. I think it's pretty obvious. It's only 'face shit' to us. This almost the exact same angle they ran before with Trish Stratus/Christy Hemme, the Diva Search, and several other times. In the 'WWE Universe' being women's champ isn't nearly as prestigious as modeling/posing for playboy/starring on a TV show.

    The dynamic with the announcers is almost exactly the same as it has been for a decade now. Announcers ogle woman and Lawler flirts with them. Faces flirt back because they're cool and enjoy showing themselves off, heels get angry because they're stuck-up prudes. This is just the latest iteration of it, the only difference is that AJ actually got a good line in against Lawler (and she'll probably get punished backstage for it).

    ReplyDelete
  24. I'm happy HHH or his team have been taking notes watching JCP episodes. Daniel Bryan is channeling that Dusty/DDP Working Man's Hero persona, and it's great.

    ReplyDelete
  25. It's been mentioned before, but Stephanie's role mainly involves coordination. The actual creative direction still comes from Vince.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Yeah, I think Stephanie is in charge of consistency and making sure the direction is reflected across all media properties.

    ReplyDelete
  27. That's pretty much what HHH said in his interview with Grantland.

    ReplyDelete
  28. It's legitimately embarrassing a person who writes recaps for this site thinks any direction for this angle is coming groom anyone besides Vince McMahon and HHH.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Haha, I did. I actually very much enjoyed that match; I just didn't have anything to say about it.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Not my point. My point is that she, or whoever is in charge of WWE writing, has never -- NEVER -- been interested in midcard. This has gone on basically since 2007 and the destruction of brand-specific PPVs. This angle is another symptom of it.

    ReplyDelete
  31. If the WWE needs a hand in punishing aj backstage, I'd be happy to help...

    ReplyDelete
  32. The thing is, it doesn't have to be that way. As tired as we all are of him, John Cena is still an excellent performer, both in-ring and on the mic when he wants to drop the poopy jokes and sell something.
    It's fatigue of having him on top (newsflash, I know). I've written about this before, but I think it would be great if Cena's clean job to Bryan represents a passing of...if not THE torch, then at least THAT one. Does he ever need to hold that title again? That should be, at this point, a "break glass in case of emergency" type of thing. If Bryan and/or Punk and/or whatever other breakout star is hurt, or ratings/buyrates/attendance just tanks without Cena on top.
    Otherwise, Cena needs to be existing on his own plane of existence, kind of like how Punk currently is in this feud with Heyman: apart from the WWE title picture and/or top storyline. Not above it, not below it...just apart from it. A special attraction, if you will.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Yeah, I can get into this type of recap. Well done, Mike, looking forward to future weeks.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Wonderfulbeing in the States for a few weeks instead of home in Asia, though. Fully enjoyed last night's RAW. A few full shows a year is very tolerable.

    ReplyDelete
  35. hi cena and nikki!

    ReplyDelete
  36. Was gonna say this but you said it perfectly. Show is a very good actor, and I would say a much better actor than just about anyone else on the roster so he's the best to fit this role. Hopefully those other guys are taking some notes from Show.

    ReplyDelete
  37. I just want to point out, in the wwe, the only time you see a slow-burn angle with a dominant heel is when hhh is the heel.

    ReplyDelete
  38. That's kinda taking a shit all over codys awesome heel work, but otherwise I agree.

    ReplyDelete
  39. I'm in the cenation...I kind of miss him

    ReplyDelete
  40. This punk vs heyman feud is fantastic and I also love how its in its separate universe. That segment last night was classic. This kind of reminds me of the old Bret hart vs Lawler feud. They wanted to keep a gigantic babyface away from the main angle so they pair him up with a shitbag heel everyone hates, and you get gold.

    ReplyDelete
  41. Just caught the whole Raw from last night, and I am giddy over the NWA-ness of it all. If Survivor Series is a 4-on-4 of Orton and the Shield vs. D-Bry, Cody with his last chance at getting back his job, uh let's say RVD and a mysterious masked man who happens to be 7' tall, we're in bidness.

    ReplyDelete
  42. The reluctant, good at heart giant is a tried-and-true staple. Andre's face turn on Heenan is still classic.

    ReplyDelete
  43. To be fair, Punk was a pretty dominant shitbag heel from Summerslam 2012 through Rumble 2013. He pinned Big Show, Cena, Ryback, beat Lawler in a cage and then took credit for his heart attack, had Heyman cutting promos about he was better than Hogan and Bruno, etc. Hell, he even had the Shield doing his dirty work.


    I mean, for the most part its true, heels never get to look as dominant as Trips does, but Punk last year was a strong as fuck heel.

    ReplyDelete
  44. True, but the fans just love him even if he can't string 5 words together. He just has IT.



    I'm just shocked at how badly they're botching what I thought was a homerun selling point for Night of Champions. If they were pushing how this is RVD's first title shot in like 7 years, and pushing him as a big star the way they did going into Money in the Bank, well shit, that absolutely would have sold some PPVs. They gave Christian more of a push going into Summerslam, and Christian doesn't mean shit to the fans compared to RVD.

    ReplyDelete
  45. YUP. I put Raw on at about 9:15pm every week, and always catch up to the live feed by the last segment. As a 2-hour show with no commercials (and no Great Khali, and no Miz's fucking entrance for the millionth time, etc) it's always a fun watch.



    Watching it three hours live is just asking for something to complain about.

    ReplyDelete
  46. Expect for the fact there was still a bigger act on the show. Punk had one of the best heel runs ever (and it was certainly 100x more entertaining than any hhh heel run) but he was still booked as the #2 guy behind cena. Hhh is presented as the guy.

    ReplyDelete
  47. I'm loving it too. If you consider it havening started back when Heyman was setting the match up with Jericho in late May, it's already been an almost 4 month story that has produced several awesome matches and great promos just about every week. Feud of the year without a doubt, and there's still lots of ways to heat it up even further.


    So Jobber, where do you think they go from here? I'd say the logical move on Sunday is to have Punk eliminate Axel, start beating on Heyman, and then a new Heyman guy (Ryback? Big E? Mattt Morgan?) runs in and attacks Punk, and there's Punk's opponent until Lesnar gets back.


    OR they could have Punk destroy Axel and Heyman on Sunday and put Heyman on the shelf for a few months. (Punk then finally gets involved in the Coproration feud.) And then in a few months Heyman returns with Lesnar and we get the blow-off then.


    Either way, one would think Sunday is Axel's final ever trip above the midcard.

    ReplyDelete
  48. Eh, I'll give you Punk being presented as the #2-Guy-While-Champ during the face half of his title run. But I definitely think that Raw was 100% the CM Punk Show from Summerslam til Rumble. Punk was getting shitloads of mic time, he was the instigator of all teh big angles, he was closing every PPV on top, and he had the big angles with Vince, Shield, Rock etc. Yeah Cena was still there, even through the injury, but I think if you look back you'll see that Punk was absolutely the main attraction of Raw after the heel turn, especially once Heyman was there.

    ReplyDelete
  49. I think this is getting stretched out at least one more ppv. I can see punk getting screwed somehow or beating up Axel so much he gets dqed and this gets blown off at hell in the cell bad heyman gets destroyed. That Bret vs Lawler feud went like 8 months so they could even stretch this out till survivor series. I think Axel is all we're getting so hopefully this gets him over

    ReplyDelete
  50. Yeah he carried the show, but hhh is always the top guy above all others when he plays heel

    ReplyDelete
  51. I'd love to see Heyman-Punk stretch out (and stay in its own parallel universe every week), but to do so I think they really need to bring in someone else on heyman's side. Punk absolutely needs a decisive win on Sunday, which pretty much takes Axel out as a serious member of the feud. I mean, Axel comes off as such a loser that having Punk feud with him any longer would actually start making Punk look bad just for being there with him. At least with Ryback, it would give Punk a new challenge. Continuing things with Axel just makes Punk look bad.

    ReplyDelete
  52. Stephanie McMahon is in charge of *all* creative for WWE: not just the TV shows, but the magazine, website, all of it. It's a big-picture job she has and pinning blame on her for individual storylines...I mean, yeah, if you want to blame her because she's in charge of the whole thing, I guess that's kinda fair in a sense, but it seems silly to me. That would be like blaming the general manager of a football team for a special teams breakdown.
    Saying that there has been no interest in the midcard since 2007 is...I mean, that's just not true. I don't know what else to tell you. You'd be well-served by dropping this whole thing where you let your hatred of anything within shouting distance of Triple H color your opinions so heavily. Just my advice.

    ReplyDelete
  53. Yeah - this is really good stuff. More please.

    ReplyDelete
  54. Normally I would agree with you, but I think things are a little different this time around. Think about Ivory in Right to Censor. They were completely over the top/wwe women are heathens, etc so they were obviously heels and obnoxious while saying so. AJ, while being somewhat obnoxious, (although frankly when compared to the other divas, her promos are MUCH more intense and believable), is bringing up real points, in a way people can actually believe unlike the RTC. I get what they're going for, but AJ's points are too "real", so she's always going to get some face heat for that.

    ReplyDelete
  55. It could be one of those cases where the 'writers' and AJ are going for one thing, and the announcers are either unaware or can't figure out how to go along. Lawler in particular seems incapable of talking about any female without drooling and/or being condescending.

    ReplyDelete
  56. These reviews remind me of Grantland's writeups, and I mean that in the best possible way. Really enjoy someone who gets the psychology of what's being presented rather than getting hung up on wins/losses and "their guy" going over.

    ReplyDelete
  57. Ignore history for a second here.


    WWE has to know that people cheered AJ's promos. I refuse to believe them to be that ignorant. And if they want to go with heel AJ. Why not say "Well Nattie's a real wrestler, and Aksana is a model".


    AJ can work heel, but the commentary is just awful at getting her over.


    Plus JBL should be blowing her like he blows every heel.

    ReplyDelete
  58. Yeah, it could just be what I said below - the commentators may not know how to sell the story. Lawler in particular is incapable of doing anything with women wrestlers other than talking about how hot they are.

    ReplyDelete
  59. I think you might be on to something here, it's so rare there's a semi serious angle among the divas that the default is (insert Diva name here) is HAWT. Then again, I'm not sure if any of the other divas have the chops to pull off and keep up with AJ...but then again, they're never really given the chance to. It's just a really odd angle at this point, I think it has the potential to be interesting, but they just haven't figured it out yet.

    ReplyDelete
  60. Very good review. Mt takeaway from the Santino match was Cesaro twirling him for what felt like forever. It was awesome.

    ReplyDelete
  61. Fair point. Commentary just kills women's wrestling. If they don't care, why should we care.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment