Skip to main content

BoD Daily Update

Hulk Hogan Update

Today is the last day of Hogan's contract with TNA. According to sources, TNA does want Hogan to return but is only able to offer a certain amount of money.

Credit Mike Johnson, PWInsider.com



When is Brock Lesnar Returning?

According to sources, Lesnar will be returning to the WWE towards the end of the year, perhaps for a match at the Royal Rumble

Credit Mike Johnson, PWInsider.com




WWE Producing a Randy Savage Documentary?

There is talk within the company that they will be producing a documentary about Savage that will be released in 2014.

Credit Mike Johnson, PWInsider.com



Wade Barrett Update

There has been talk within the company that Barrett will return with a new character and a push in the next few weeks.

Credit F4Wonline.com

Comments

  1. Its really strange to me that Hulks contact status isn't bigger news. Guess thats what happens when you work for a company with tens of fans for a fan base.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Man, I really feel bad for Barrett. This guy has the look, etc., but after the Nexus he's just been floating from repackaging to repackaging, with alleged pushes.

    Maybe he should cut ties for a bit, freshen up back in the UK scene. Might be good for him at this point.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hogan family drama is a far bigger deal now than Hogan wrestling news.


    (That is, unless he is in WWE.)

    ReplyDelete
  4. It was never winning the title in the first place that killed Barrett dead. As leader of this hot new group they gave him the big push but always came up short with regards actually winning the title.

    Well that and the fact he banished john cena for one whole week.

    He's just never been able to shake the loser tag off since and is one of the biggest casualties of the wwe's ridiculous stop/start pushes.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I liked Barretts legit tough guy gimmick.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Wade "the Barber" Beefcake!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Me too. A Barrett-Cesaro-Regal alliance would have been pretty cool in my eyes.

    ReplyDelete
  8. And the main problem is the WWE's failure to make mid-card talent interesting and strong. With TV replacing house shows there's no more idea of working "A" towns "B" towns and "C" towns so no one other than the top top top guys need to be booked strong.

    Back in the day if the WWF is working two house shows a day with two different groups the secondary champions had to be strong and have really intriguing programs because they were needed to sell tickets.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Doc on Mach, eh? This may smack of Charlie Brown making a run at the football, but I think this sets up nicely for Savage headlining the HOF class leading into Mania 30.

    I imagine they'd want a big name for that and there's no one bigger who represents the lineage of wrestlemania (not already inducted)

    ReplyDelete
  10. Yea, if they would have just booked him strong and given him a direction, that gimmick would have gotten over

    ReplyDelete
  11. I'll say it again: get Wade a Ricky Gervais for his own Chris Finch.

    ReplyDelete
  12. YankeesHoganTripleHFanOctober 1, 2013 at 10:36 AM

    The Doc should be pretty good but the interesting question will be the matches, seeing as how most of his really good ones are on the first DVD.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Praying for Bad News Barrett (with cat)

    ReplyDelete
  14. Just to play Devil's advocate, could it be argued that the WHC is basically the IC champion and is booked about as strong? I mean, I'd say Del Rio is booked about as strongly as IC-level Rude, Perfect, HBK, etc were.


    If you really look at it, WWE now probably books about as many guys "strongly" as they did back in the Hulkamania days. Punk/Bryan/Cena/Orton/Shield/ADR (and the part-timers) would be the equivalent of Hogan/Savage/Warrior/Rude/Dibiase/Snake in say '89. And then everyone else is trading wins. The differences are:
    - Today there's no squash matches, so a midcarder NEVER gets a super convincing win. Just an occasional "oh that guy missed a move, I hit my finisher" win against another midcarder whom he'll probably trade the win back to in a few weeks.
    - There's only ONE federation/brand/whatever so there's only one main event scene and one midcard. This is huge. As ridiculous as the fake brand split was in WWE, I think losing it has done a ton of damage to midcarders because now there is only ONE main event scene instead of two, which in the end means "less spots for guys to regularly win matches on TV."


    So what am I saying? I'm saying the conditions of WWE programming (no squash matches, no brand split) makes it really tough to do anything with the non-main-eventers. Not saying they CAN'T still do a much better job, but those conditions (self-imposed though, sure) make it tough.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Would he be a scrappy underdog?

    ReplyDelete
  16. Hogan: It's TNA, of course there's contract drama/stupidity involved
    Lesnar: So Ryback's push has no more than three months left. Cool.
    Savage: If true, about fucking time.
    Barrett: Over/Under on failure: 30 days. I'm taking the Under.

    ReplyDelete
  17. To to get to Bakerish, but couldnt a solid play be blowing off Punk/Brock at say Rumble by Heyman costing Brock the match either inadvertently or on purpose. Then go with a face Brock vs the newest Heyman guy, Ryback at WM. I know its a rehase of the Punk/Brock storyline but it gets Ryback in a high profile feud that actually makes sense.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Barrett's story has been such a pity. The guy can talk, has a good look, and can work a match well enough. If they'd just get behind him soldily for more than 5 minutes then he'd be successful. Probably one of the best examples of a guy that would benefit from a legit second option to go to.

    ReplyDelete
  19. I don't know if they are booked as strongly. I don't think so.

    Back then you needed the I-C guy to draw money. He was likely headlining all the 'B' shows and he needed to be a legitimate draw with a legitimate program. At times I can argue that the Savage-HTM program of 1987-88 was booked higher than whatever Hogan was doing until the Megapowers thing started to gain traction.

    Now you can say that Del Rio is booked as strong as the I-C title guy was but they don't need him to draw a dime. He's on the same card with the Cenas, Punks, etc. so he's just a guy filling out a card.

    Otherwise I agree about the squashes and brand splits.

    ReplyDelete
  20. I'm sure Ernest Miller would love the pay day.

    ReplyDelete
  21. It's amazing how "this guy is tough and likes to fight and beat people up" is a gimmick now.

    ReplyDelete
  22. I think it would have been funny if "The Real Americans" became a faction of non-Americans:
    Caesaro
    Barrett
    Leo Kruger
    Regal

    ReplyDelete
  23. It helps that hes a legit bareknuckle fighting badass. Loved those vignettes they were showing when they were reintroducing him.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Ultimate Warrior

    ReplyDelete
  25. They're not going to waste one of Brock's appearances on Ryback.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Meltzer reported they were thinking about putting Ryback vs Taker. Thats more prestigious then a Brock match. Ill agree its not a probable scenario but its far from impossible

    ReplyDelete
  27. They can always throw Christian in there for a mouthpiece.

    ReplyDelete
  28. davidbonzaisaldanamontgomeryOctober 1, 2013 at 12:12 PM

    THE BARRETT BOMBARDMENT

    ReplyDelete
  29. Face Brock is not good.


    also, I mean, dude just doesn't want to talk, so Heyman serves a more integral role for him than he did for Punk.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Introducing... Corr Blimey Wade Barrett the Cheeky Cockney and his merry crew of homeless orphan thieves!

    ReplyDelete
  31. If they do it, Meltzer is right. If they don't, they changed their minds, so Meltzer is still right.

    ReplyDelete
  32. I had legit forgotten about Poor Wade. Would've made a good Heyman guy. That arm injury really dicked him over.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Punk and Heyman are proving right now that you don't need the brand split, to effectively have your own, well told story. It's an interesting model for what you could do.
    Imagine if the people going for the IC belt had zero interactions with anyone else. Or even the U.S. title, WHC is sort of doing it, but they're doing it poorly. No idea why they can't just throw the belt on RVD. (Contract "issues" aside.)

    ReplyDelete
  34. I thought Savage's brother wouldn't allow it unless they were both inducted? (Which has never made sense to me. Baseball players don't get to choose to be in the hall of fame, do they? Like. They always say that Owen will never go into the hall of fame because his wife hates the WWE. But, really. What could she do about it?)

    ReplyDelete
  35. Barrett had a video teaser for his new character during Raw last night, finally going with the bare knuckled boxer gimmick he should of had from day 1.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Another new gimmick for Wade? His career peaked with Nexus, it's time to move on

    ReplyDelete
  37. It's time for Hulk to come home.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Meltzer's not there to magically tell you what is GOING TO HAPPEN. He can report what possible plans are, what people are discussing backstage. He isn't there to use sorcery and see the future.

    ReplyDelete
  39. In Owen's wife's case, Sue them.


    In Randy's, they just don't want the bad pub of the family trashing them

    ReplyDelete
  40. But what could she sue them for exactly?

    ReplyDelete
  41. She sued them for using footage of Owen in the "Hart and Soul" DVD. something about the settlement where she had to approve using his likeness IIRC

    ReplyDelete
  42. YankeesHoganTripleHFanOctober 1, 2013 at 1:05 PM

    I'll second that

    ReplyDelete
  43. YankeesHoganTripleHFanOctober 1, 2013 at 1:09 PM

    Lanny does not deserve to go into the HOF. It would be like Joe DiMaggio refusing to going the baseball Hall of Fame unless Domenic DiMaggio got to go as well.

    ReplyDelete
  44. YankeesHoganTripleHFanOctober 1, 2013 at 1:10 PM

    How exactly did they wrong the Macho Man? Vince wanted him to be a commentator. Randy wanted to wrestle. Randy asked for his release. Vince gave it to him.

    ReplyDelete
  45. I fully admit its a brilliant scam. He can say anything and never be wrong.

    ReplyDelete
  46. So Meltzer's reporting is only worth whether he's able to correctly predict match results ahead of time?

    ReplyDelete
  47. You have to admit, its a pretty good racket.

    ReplyDelete
  48. Get outta here! I WOULD have Warrior second on that list, buts its a distant second. Machos legacy, especially in Mania, is just on another stratosphere.

    ReplyDelete
  49. OK, so rather than conversing you're just gonna troll. Cool.

    ReplyDelete
  50. Are you saying it isn't? I get that you keep trying to change the subject. I just choose not to go along with it.

    ReplyDelete
  51. Home meaning the retirement home?

    ReplyDelete
  52. What I'm saying, and what you're willfully ignoring, is that his wrestling reporting isn't just about "this is what's gonna happen next week on the TV show." There's a lot more to what an Observer reader has gotten out of his coverage over the years than that. So when you boil Meltzer's coverage to match/storyline predictions, you're just changing things to fit your argument.

    ReplyDelete
  53. The fact they even WANT to keep Hogan gives me zero hope for their future.

    ReplyDelete
  54. There is something far more than that involved but nobody knows for sure what it is.

    ReplyDelete
  55. What I'm boiling it down to is:
    Dave: I really hate wrestling, but my sources tell me that such and such and such and such is all going to happen.
    *three months go by*
    Public: Hey Dave! What happened to all that stuff you said was going to happen?
    Dave: They changed their mind.
    I'm just saying that's a pretty amazing way to make a living. Built in excuses when you're wrong.

    ReplyDelete
  56. YankeesHoganTripleHFanOctober 1, 2013 at 1:47 PM

    Yeah I suppose. The Stephanie urban legend, nonwithstanding.

    ReplyDelete
  57. And again what I'm saying is that the Observer, and Meltzer's coverage of pro wrestling, isn't about the part where he says "this is what WWE is going to book." That's you want to pretend what his content has been about all this time, then fine. We're talking circles now. Peace.

    ReplyDelete
  58. You do realize that the story being discussed is a prediction story?

    ReplyDelete
  59. I always felt the Savage/Vince/WWE heat was overstated. Even former employees say that it was an unspoken word never to mention Savage's name, but there's so much evidence, although circumstantial, to the contrary. Even before his death, he appeared quite frequently in video packages on WWE television. He was mentioned a great deal in WWE Magazine, even being interviewed in an early edition of Smackdown magazine. And he appeared on WWE.com (even before it turned into the fun page it is today) no less than anybody else from that era. It just seems like Vince wouldn't allow that if the hatred was THAT significant.

    ReplyDelete
  60. There are dozens of us!! DOZENS!!

    ReplyDelete
  61. Just like you with your obsessive "Miz was scheduled to have all these big matches, but they were given to Punk instead"?

    ReplyDelete
  62. I love that you still don't understand that.

    ReplyDelete
  63. There's nothing to understand, you're just "pulling a Meltzer" as I'm sure you would probably call it.

    ReplyDelete
  64. And you still don't get it.

    ReplyDelete
  65. Im not so sure they want someone DEAD headlining/leading a HOF class.

    ReplyDelete
  66. No it'd be like Domenic DiMaggio refusing to let Joe in the HOF unless he got in as well.


    Theres a difference.

    ReplyDelete
  67. You're just trolling. Nothing to get.

    ReplyDelete
  68. Stop using my line Douglas.

    ReplyDelete
  69. Trying to enlighten you is what I imagine teaching conversational french to sponges is like.

    ReplyDelete
  70. Lanny says that Savage didn't WANT to go in without the family, and particularly his Dad.
    It might be true, and if it is then Lanny is doing the right thing in honouring his wishes.
    We have no idea.

    ReplyDelete
  71. It wouldn't exactly make for a joyous celebration to induct a deceased man against the wishes of his heirs.

    ReplyDelete
  72. that im not discounting.


    Im just saying that the analogy he is using is on the right track, but needs to be tailored a bit

    ReplyDelete
  73. And as for Martha, even of she has no legal grounds, it would be pretty dickish to induct Owen - not only deceased, but someone who they kinda sorta killed - into their silly hall of fame against the wishes of his widow.

    ReplyDelete
  74. Alright Ricky, I'll give you that.
    If that's even your real name.

    ReplyDelete
  75. Don't forget Punk making him look like a total schmuck. Leading to the Corre. Which proved Punk was right to make him look like a schmuck.

    ReplyDelete
  76. Okay, so enlighten me. Explain these stupid Miz stories that had absolutely no merit to them?

    ReplyDelete
  77. Yet another wrestler in Barrett who would get over just by messing up some enhancement wrestlers. Let George South come to Florida and train a generation of businesspeople.

    ReplyDelete
  78. Back to the WWE and get that Legend pop at Wrestlemania 30 and be a talking head in their documentaries. Their upcoming Randy Savage one won't be complete without hearing from the Hulkster.

    ReplyDelete
  79. He did? I didn't even notice.

    ReplyDelete
  80. Totally agree that he would have been a fantastic "Heyman Guy". A billion times better than Curtis Axel.


    Come to think of it, a stable of Ryback, Barrett, and Langston would be pretty good. Similar big, bad-ass type guys. Maybe even have one of them oust Axel, and give Axel a shot as a face (under his given name, preferably).

    And wouldn't the three of them make quite the opposing "back-up members" of a Brock-lead Survivor Series team?

    ReplyDelete
  81. This may sound ridiculous, but I really think that - on a subconscious level - one of the things that kept the "Bare-Knuckle Brawler" gimmick from getting over was that he didn't really look like a bare-knuckle brawler. He looked like a wrestler and was booked like a wrestler. He wore wrestling tights and did wrestling moves.

    I really think that if he just entered the ring wearing jeans, and just knocked people out left and right with, well, lefts and rights, I think he would have "looked the part" and seemed more credible in the role.

    Of course, that's relatively minor compared to not actually being booked well (repeatedly losing to Orton on free TV), but I do think that the new character never really "clicked" entirely for the above reason.

    ReplyDelete
  82. Ahh. See, that I had no idea about.

    ReplyDelete
  83. Ditto.

    Throwing more money at him when he's PROVEN to not benefit the company in any way is just asinine.

    ReplyDelete
  84. Any you can never say anything and be correct. So, Meltzer is the anti-Osiris.

    IT ALL MAKES SENSE.

    ReplyDelete
  85. According to Lanny, it was Randy's wish the family be inducted as a group, and he's just trying to honor his brother's wish. But he's also said he doesn't care if they induct Randy without the rest of the family.... Just don't expect him to be a part of it.

    ReplyDelete
  86. Warrior seems a lock to be inducted this year, deservedly or not.

    ReplyDelete
  87. But... but... he did more things for them than ever before! I mean, he got them overseas stuff or something like that!

    ReplyDelete
  88. Barrett and Christian would make a hell of a tag team, I think.

    ReplyDelete
  89. Damn, thanks for catching that.

    ReplyDelete
  90. Bad News Brown and Fit Finlay made careers out of it.

    ReplyDelete
  91. More like that's what happens when you constantly outstay your welcome.

    ReplyDelete
  92. Bryan/Lesnar at the Rumble for the title. Book it!

    ReplyDelete
  93. "Creative" kinda dicked him over, too.

    ReplyDelete
  94. They just need to release Wade Barrett already. It's time to admit he's never ever going to recover from getting buried by 100 folding chairs by John Cena and then getting mired in the midcard for three years.

    ReplyDelete
  95. Wasn't that Jeff Jarrett's doing far more than Hogan?

    ReplyDelete
  96. I don't know if its happened before, but I'd mark out to see Hulk, Austin and Cena all standing in the same ring at Mania.

    ReplyDelete
  97. He should go to Japan for a few years and come back to a $400,000 contract.

    ReplyDelete
  98. 80% of old school wrestlers made a career out of it. That was my point. Wrestlers used to be big, mean, burly, tough guys. Now being a guy that is actually tough is rare enough that it can be a gimmick for one guy.

    ReplyDelete
  99. Also Dom DiMaggio is much more deserving of any HOF consideration than Leaping Lanny.
    7 time all star
    Career .298 BA, .383 OBP as a very good centerfielder.

    ReplyDelete
  100. I really thought that they were onto something with the mini Bryan/Barrett feud a few months ago - if Barrett hadn't been booked to look like a loser (again), I think the feud could have had legs, at least for the C-level shows like "Battleground".

    ReplyDelete
  101. If they're gonna do it, may as well go all out - Bryan/Lesnar at "WM".

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment