"Let's be brutally honest here: if Daniel Bryan drew money like the Rock or Steve Austin, this wouldn't be an issue."
Arguments about HHH aside, WWE follows the numbers much closer than we do (duh) and there just wasn't evidence that Bryan was drawing on top, so it's totally justifiable on their part to pull the plug and go back to Orton and Cena again. Is it good or risky or desirable? No, of course not. But Vince loves money even more than he loves bodybuilding competitions, and if the numbers were behind Bryan than he would get all the protection in the world and no one would ever steal his catchphrase. But house shows are way down, PPV is flat or down, and we all know what the ratings are like lately.
I don't agree with the strategy, but I certainly understand it.
Comments
Post a Comment