Skip to main content

Chael Sonnen fails drug test, off UFC 175

image
Sonnen fails drug test, out of UFC 175 bout
UFC light heavyweight Chael Sonnen has failed a random drug test and will not fight Vitor Belfort at UFC 175 on July 5.
Preview by Yahoo

Wow. Talk about a card that's had its deck shuffled more times than an all-night poker session. And I can't imagine Chael escaping this one unscathed.

What a fuckup.

​The funny thing is that Chael was looking like the good soldier after all the stupidity with Wanderlei went down, and now he looks like an even bigger clown.  

But let's face facts, there's no way Vitor Belfort was getting cleared for that fight without having Ronda Rousey pee in a bottle for him.  So the whole thing was pretty much doomed from the get go.  

If this was wrestling, it'd be a hell of an angle, though.​

Comments

  1. Speaking of, it is probably time for him to finally make the switch.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Therapeutic use ban was bound to hit someone

    ReplyDelete
  3. I wish Dr Hous-Farva, I MEANT FARVA was around to tell us if anyone besides athletes consistently use this testosterone therapy deal. I think this Dr Google is a quack, and I don't trust him.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hasn't Sonnen been busted before?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Wasn't Chael like 30 lbs. overweight anyways for the fight?

    ReplyDelete
  6. He can always compete in a rigged Smackoff on the Jim Rome Show again.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Amsterdam_Adam_CurryJune 10, 2014 at 6:17 PM

    For being a giant douche? Yes, many times, and on camera.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Chael has been my favorite for years, but it's getting harder and harder to support him.

    ReplyDelete
  9. One of the most entertaining heels of the UFC.I wanted to see him take a beatdown from Silva in the rematch,after those racial comments,that motherfucker drawed tons of heat in Brazil.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Hugh Laurie would actually know more.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Chael's always been known as more of a character than a fighter and he's been outclassed in his biggest fights. Go to WWE already and get summa dat Brock Lesnar money, dawg.

    ReplyDelete
  12. See, I saw him as the babyface. "Anderson Silva, you absolutely suck!" is my favorite post fight interview ever. I think it was after Chael beat Bisping. Fucker knew how to sell a fight. The rematch broke the million mark... but I remember Chael being grossly underpaid.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Sonnen choose the wrong profession,he should've stayed in his wrestling career.

    ReplyDelete
  14. How can a babyface can do racial shit?

    ReplyDelete
  15. Because everyone agreed with what he said.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Well, maybe I just liked him so much I was delusional.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Amsterdam_Adam_CurryJune 10, 2014 at 6:41 PM

    He should have fucked off to a profession that makes sure he never appears on camera, unless it's a mug shot.


    Fuck Chael Sonnen, and fuck his parents for giving him a stupid name, among other things.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Really well said. It always puzzles me when people make these comparisons between the WWF and WCW in the late 1990s on this point.

    The WWF had hard workers on top (terrible midcard) in 1995 and 1996, but made no money because nobody liked the booking. With good booking it'd been 2000.

    The WWF wrestling product in 1998 and1999 was horrible, with guys having an open invitation to dog it via the Russo garbage style and their limited skill sets, but it's the most successful era ever because the booking was so good. The lack of guaranteed contracts didn't save us from a year of hundreds of bad matches.

    It's all booking -- the WWF was better for longer at getting the most out of their roster and putting guys in the position to succeed.

    ReplyDelete
  19. This is all wwe rhetoric. If you can honestly tell me that you don't think 99.9% of people that have been on tv in the last x years have not been on some sort of gas, you're fooling yourself.
    These measures are not done for wrestlers "safety"
    They're done so Linda McMahon can blow tens of millions on a political campaign without dead wrestler questions.

    ReplyDelete
  20. but was that lack of motivation due to the environment of WCW or guaranteed contracts? I might be less motivated if know my performance doesn't matter because the top spots are spoken for no matter what (although that didn't seem to affect the Radicals, the cruiserweights, etc.). The environment of WCW was toxic even in 98 when they were still making money hand over fist due to the stuff going on with Hogan, Nash, Hall, later Goldberg pulling power plays, etc. That environment wasn't a result of guaranteed contracts but a result of a head guy who wouldn't stand up to talent and wasn't a leader. It was a result of a disorganized backstage system where different bookers didn't know what each was doing. A system where road agents weren't around and most guys simply got a finish with no suggestions on how to work the match (see Jericho's first book for a description). Paying people a set amount of money for a set amount of dates (and remember you got paid for working extra so there WAS incentive to work more or better to get booked more) is a good thing. Arbitrarily deciding who "drew" for each show based on the whims of Vince is not a good thing. It wasn't then and it isn't now. JJ Dillon's book provides a great rundown of how payoffs went as well as quick snippets in Bret's book and Jericho's book when they got ridiculously small checks for their alleged role in a ppv. With no set formula, Vince can pay guys what he wants for shows.

    ReplyDelete
  21. The Ghost of Faffner HallJune 10, 2014 at 7:32 PM

    It went downhill rapidly once they put Zodiac behind the counter.
    "Are your crullers freshly baked?"
    "YES! NO! YES! NO! YES! NO!"

    ReplyDelete
  22. Another sign of a not-well-planned heel turn?

    ReplyDelete
  23. Flair's full-time role is as pyro.


    Not a "pyro controller" -- actual pyro. He'll lay on the ground, wait for the wrestler to enter, and then -- lighter to mouth and breathe out.

    ReplyDelete
  24. It's rhetoric backed up by data.


    Wrestlers WERE dropping like flies 10 years ago.


    They aren't now.


    If you think otherwise, prove it.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Eh, they got a lot of it together when Nitro started.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Odd: most of the upvotes seem to be from Canadians. Hmm...

    ReplyDelete
  27. Dude, they're all dead or look like Bret Hart. I don't have Kurrgans EKG results or Joe Legend's proctology exam to prove their health. But like...you think Cena looks that way naturally? How clueless are you?
    And if you agree he's not, why hasn't he got busted for this "wellness policy?"

    ReplyDelete
  28. I know that Foley got his SAG card for a year after appearing on some USA show. I just don't get how the SAG isn't in these guys' corners when the WWE chairman himself has deemed that theirs is not competitive sports, but entertainment...

    ReplyDelete
  29. Was Hogan supposed to lose to Flair at Wrestlemania?

    ReplyDelete
  30. But Flair did lose, to Savage. If he was supposed to go over Hogan, why job him to Savage?

    ReplyDelete
  31. But would have smart fans accepted a Hulk Hogan in WCW that would have done count out jobs in the 1990's as a way of building up opponents or would they have turned on it since they would have expected Hogan to get with the times and job by pinfall? Hogan did a bunch of jobs in 1996-97, but most would say they counted for nothing due to the way Hogan was booked shortly after.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Even more egregious because the WWE now calls them "actors."

    ReplyDelete
  33. Scott,

    Do you really think Hogan jobbing to a guy who had been booked as such a monster for years in WCW would have hurt him one bit? I say screw that DQ nonsense. Give Vader that first win clean and do the big money rematch down the line with Hogan going over.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Imagine if Austin found the character earlier and his neck didn't get fucked up.

    ReplyDelete
  35. You're completely confused by storyline and reality. The storyline was always that Sid's jealousy over not getting the title shot would lead him to turn on Hogan, and Hogan would demand Sid in return.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Only 2-3 guys in the world would know for sure. But Ric was the champ and Hulk was eager for some time off so it seems probable.


    Hogan was probably angling for a DQ win just like what ended up happening with Sid.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Because Macho was sticking around hence they could run re-matches and more importantly have the champ actually compete on the roster. Plus Vince having another one of his last minute mind changes on how Slick Ric was drawing/would draw as champ.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Nope. The match was never gonna happen. Flair/Hogan was barely drawing decent house show numbers by the end of 1991, let alone be big enough for a Mania main event.

    ReplyDelete
  39. While speculated by Meltzer at the time, that 'factiod' was applied retroactively. Judging from all of the crazy booking that year, I really wouldn't be surprised if Vince didn't really know himself until after the Rumble what he was going with. He set himself up with a number of options going into the Rumble.

    Whatever the case may be -- The "this could be Hogan's last match" angle came out of nowhere. I'm pretty sure when the sex scandal hit and the steroid talk picked back up that all potential plans led to getting Hogan off of TV and out of the hotseat for awhile.

    ReplyDelete
  40. I think there’s more than enough circumstantial evidence to
    point towards Hogan/Flair never being the main event. The match already being
    used on a daily basis at house shows all through the latter part of 1991, Hogan
    taking time off to do movies after Wrestlemania and thus not being in a
    position to win the title, Sid’s alleged guarantee of the main event in
    Wrestlemania as incentive to jump ship from WCW, Sid eliminating Hogan from the
    Rumble rather than Flair… The Sid heel turn had begun before the Hogan/Flair “announcement”,
    why would they do that? Such a big angle involving Hogan could only detract
    from a Flair/Hogan buildup.

    ReplyDelete
  41. Well 3 hours of boring matches where nothing happens is worse than 2 hours of boring matches where nothing happens is worse than 1 hour of boring matches where nothing happens. The more tv time you have, the more variety the shows should have and the faster the pace has to be.

    ReplyDelete
  42. Had a feeling that would shut you up..

    ReplyDelete
  43. I refer you to Lesnar, Brock. When you bring somebody in and make a big deal about them, you DON'T job them in their first match. Even if it's to a mega monster or the top star.

    ReplyDelete
  44. I'll give you biggest draw but not most famous. EVERYONE knows who Hulk Hogan is. There are a lot of people who would see a photo of Austin and not know who he is.

    ReplyDelete
  45. That period was like the complete anti-thesis of the Hogan stereotype. He was putting everybody over, he was losing clean, he was working in the midcard, he was helping younger guys become stars. Hell, he even made fun of the fact that he was bald. It was really strange.

    ReplyDelete
  46. Uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.....................Pretty sure Flair was his first opponent unless in your alternate universe 1994 comes after 1995

    ReplyDelete
  47. I'm not so sure. Rock is a house hold name past the level of hogan. As for Austin he had the single biggest run of any wrestler ever. Hogan is not at the same level of popularity or drawing power of Austin or Rock.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment