Skip to main content

Undertaker Questions

1. When/how was it decided that Undertaker would go back to his goth gimmick?

2. Were there ever rumblings of him jumping to WCW? While he tended to be a major part for the 90s, he had so many dull feuds I'm curious if WCW pondered luring him too.

3. Was there ever anyone else in the running to portray Kane that we know of?

1.  It was just a thing for Wrestlemania XX and I guess he liked doing it.  It was more of an undead cowboy thing anyway, not really a "goth" gimmick at that point.

2.  Nope, never.

3.  Nope.  We all knew it was gonna be Glen Jacobs from the moment it was teased.  

Comments

  1. Scott's complex feelings on the Undertaker always keeps me coming back.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Not sure how serious they were, but there were rumors that Undertaker wanted to quit unless he got a world title, which is why he got the title at WM13 and while Glen Jacobs was the favorite to play Kane, there were also some small rumors that the gig would go to Dan Spivey.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I remember some very strong iwc buzz al snow was being considered for Kane

    ReplyDelete
  4. You're wrong on the 3rd one Scott ... Scott Levy (Raven) was heavily rumored to portray the role of "Cain" once Bearer started carrying on about Undertaker's long lost brother.

    ReplyDelete
  5. This earns a rarely given upvote from me. Well done.

    ReplyDelete
  6. That would have been awesome. The psychotic psychological promos from him would have been great. Hes also like 6 feet and probably would have been fired in 2 years but whatever.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I don't believe that would have been possible. Levy signed on for WCW about five minutes after Barely Legal 97 ended, and Bearer didn't start talking about undertaker's long lost brother until May/June.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I recall hearing a rumor that Callaway tried to investigate his options with WCW, but Bischoff wasn't interested since he felt like he was nothing without the gimmick.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I remember sid vs taker always being the back up plan when shawn bailed

    ReplyDelete
  10. Kane The Undertaker was always going to be Mark Calloway.

    4. Why did Pauk Bearer name both of his kids Kane?

    ReplyDelete
  11. He took notes from George Foreman

    ReplyDelete
  12. By God thats gotta be Kane. Best debut ever IMO, yes better then Y2Js bc he actually did something of importance rather then cut a ten minute promo.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I have never once heard that. Plus Vince hated Raven and wouldn't have possibly pushed him in a high profile program like that, especially against someone so much bigger.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Bonus question...was it known Kane was going to debut/interfere during that HITC match?

    ReplyDelete
  15. Cant say I completely disagree with that.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Yeah, I heard that as well. It was never anything past Undertaker asking around at one point IIRC.

    ReplyDelete
  17. No people were legit surprised. And because the match was so good and hbk went over Kane got a lot of inital good will

    ReplyDelete
  18. He seemed pretty over as the biker. He could've just done that as Mark Calloway.

    ReplyDelete
  19. I remember being absolutely convinced during SummerSlam 1996 that both Taker and yokozuna were heading to WCW, just based on how badly they lost to Mankind and Austin respectively. I was still a year away from any internet access, but I could already see the "Time Honored tradition" patterns when a guy was done with the company.



    I was pleasantly surprised when both guys (especially Taker) were on Raw the following night.

    ReplyDelete
  20. He was over, but I think alot of that were wwe fans who were loyal to calloway. I dont know how well that gimmick gets over in wcw.

    ReplyDelete
  21. I think Kane had already started doing the gimmick/character at house shows though, so I think people knew he'd be showing up 'soon'.

    ReplyDelete
  22. It was heavily rumored that Paul McCartney died and some impostor took his place in the Beatles. In the wrestling world, it was rumored that Jim Hellwig died and somebody else took his place as the Ultimate Warrior.

    Just because something was rumored doesn't mean there's any truth to it.
    There may have been a rumor going around the 'net that Raven was going to play Undertaker's brother: that doesn't mean anybody in the WWF had any plans or desire to put Raven in that role.

    ReplyDelete
  23. According to Wikipedia you are correct. Raven showed in WCW in April, and the first hint of Bearer having some 'terrible secret' about 'Taker was in May.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Not to mention that Rock completely buried him and turned him into a joke in that very segment. If Cena did something like that, he'd be crucified. But I guess the Rock gets a free pass when it comes to how many people he turned into jokes during his prime years.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Even with the biker gimmick, he still had the 'Undertaker' name

    ReplyDelete
  26. Rock 'burying' him wasn't that a big of a deal, because Rock did that to everyone. He could easily have recovered.

    What killed Jericho was everyone else treating him like a joke, having some crappy matches out of the gate, accidentally pissing off Undertaker backstage, and getting saddled with Mr. Hughes.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Diesel and Razor Ramon did ok without their gimmicks.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Rock killed everyone, and yeah, Rock got a pass because he was awesome.
    HHH making him his personal whipping boy is what slowed Jericho down.

    ReplyDelete
  29. I agree that Rock should have just let Jericho "get one over on him". Rock definitely ended up looking better in that exchange.

    I gotta disagree on the Rock/Cena comparison. Rocks shtick was always the same in promos...coolest guy in the room, thats kinda a dick who will make fun of anyone. Cenas a white bread dorky babyface. When he puts a legit dig at someone it REALLY stands out. When Rock did it, it doesnt really hurt that person since its part of the narrative.

    ReplyDelete
  30. I remember reading stuff on the net about how they had Kane do his gimmick at some house shows in order to test out the character before he officially debuted. At least that's what I remember. It's been over 15 years.

    ReplyDelete
  31. It's interesting that for as much praise as Jericho's debut gets, Jericho admits in his book that looking back
    he hates it because he acted way too goofy and comedic
    in his facial expressions which basically solidified him as a joke character right from the start.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Wow, didn't know that. That would have been fascinating to see live.

    ReplyDelete
  33. I remember that too.

    ReplyDelete
  34. True. Id argue that they were never "gimmick" performers they way calloway was. I think they were better workers and better on the mic at the time they jumped then Calloway would have been also (guess Nash is debatable), which helped in their transition alot

    ReplyDelete
  35. I forget if I was subscribed to keller or meltzer at the time but one of them claimed his debut was supposed to be a promo exchange with the road dogg instead of Rock.

    ReplyDelete
  36. HAHAHAHH.... HHH is once again to blame for all of the world's problems!!! This is incredible!

    ReplyDelete
  37. Then why did he hire Scott Levy back after the Johnny Polo stint?

    ReplyDelete
  38. Dude, are you a HHH mark? While hes not solely responsible for everything that went wrong with Jericho (not working the wwe "style" is up there) but hes held back, buried, or just sucked the heat off of: RVD, Kane, Y2J, Goldberg, Punk, Bryan, Booker T. Im sure there are others im forgetting as well

    ReplyDelete
  39. That one, specifically.

    ReplyDelete
  40. That earns a rarely given downvote from me.

    ReplyDelete
  41. I think youre just upset I dont have an avatar for you to make an emoticon with.

    ReplyDelete
  42. Don't pay him any mind, he's an anti smark.

    ReplyDelete
  43. I think it would've went over well, considering the audience.

    ReplyDelete
  44. Yea maybe. Never thought of the big biker contingent wcw attracted

    ReplyDelete
  45. Yeah basically Idiot is the genus, anti-smark the species.

    ReplyDelete
  46. Well, he didn't as per the "Who the fuck hired Johnny Polo?" comment he made when he first saw Scott Levy back on the roster.


    And also, Raven was never pushed in a high profile program, so what Scott said wasn't wrong.

    ReplyDelete
  47. yeah I seem to recall something around then about Taker possible jumping to WCW...I also recall something about him possibly coming back in all-white.

    ReplyDelete
  48. Oh don't get me started on the Goldberg thing... Of all of those HHH myths, him allegedly "burying" Goldberg is the one that makes me laugh the most. I could go on a 10 page rant about it....



    They had 4 PPV matches, 2 wins each. Both of HHH's wins were by total fluke in a multi man match, while Goldberg's 2 wins were 100% clean in 1 on 1 matches. All 4 made it crystal clear that HHH was no match for him. How in the BLUE HELL did HHH "bury" him? lol

    ReplyDelete
  49. He sucked off his heat by not putting goldberg over when the time was right, summerslam. That was when goldberg was really getting over and him taking a pedigree and sledgehammer cooled him off. When goldberg finally went over, he had cooled off and people werent as excited and care about him as much

    ReplyDelete
  50. He didn't have the biker gimmick then. I have a feeling that was part of the reason he went to the biker gimmick and held on to it for so long.

    ReplyDelete
  51. For 1, I thought it was Vince. Have read multiple things where Vince absolutely despised the Bikertaker gimmick. Basically the only thing that tops it with WWE retconning is Benoit.

    ReplyDelete
  52. -The money is in the chase! The money is in the chase! The money is in the chase! OMG THEY DID NOT GIVE GOLDBERG THE TITLE ON HIS VERY VERY FIRST CHANCE IN A MULTI MAN MATCH! HE IS BURIED FORREEVVERRR!!!


    -But Umm... He won the title 100% clean the very next month, in a perfectly logical and well built chase.


    -BUURRRIIEEDDD!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  53. This earns and easily given upvote from me.

    Well played sir, well played.

    ReplyDelete
  54. It was actually a couple months iirc

    ReplyDelete
  55. Exhale.

    I didnt say he burried Goldberg, I said he sucked the heat off him. The time to put the belt on anyone is when theyre hottest as a face, the reason babyface chases are successful is because it builds sympathy for the face so the face can go over and have a successful mmoney drawing run on top. Not every feud needs to follow this. The fans clearly showed they were ready for goldberg to go over, there was need for a chase here. Not giving it to him cooled him off.

    ReplyDelete
  56. Yeah but he was a huge star. If he'd kept even some of the mannerisms and been booked half as invincibly, he would have stayed over like gangbusters.
    I don't think that he would have jumped because of the politics. He might have done ok that way, but in WWF there was really no one in his way at all, he was a well established top dog and respected by the other top dogs.

    ReplyDelete
  57. Goldberg didn't need a chase, he walked in the door as hot as he was ever going to be.
    And he had limitations, he was best used as an unbeatable killer.

    ReplyDelete
  58. All good points. Either way it would have been interesting to see how it played out. The botched Bret Hart run makes it hard for me to give them any benefit of the doubt.

    ReplyDelete
  59. ***bows graciously***

    ReplyDelete
  60. Yeah, true, I still wonder how they managed to screw up with him. He was one of the most over guys in the business, at his hottest point ever.

    ReplyDelete
  61. The gave the audience blue balls in a spot where they had FINALLY accepted him. It was dumb on two fronts.


    1) If he was only going to work a year, they pissed away the most heat they were ever going to get for him.


    2) If they had long-term plans beyond a year, he never really recovered from it and left in a very meh fashion.

    ReplyDelete
  62. If they didn't intend to do the change, they should have called an audible after he murdered everyone and the crowd went insane.

    ReplyDelete
  63. Yea, ive heard the same. One of the ex writers on Kellers podcast said you werent allowed to mention the biker taker gimmick around Vince, because he hated it so much. Dont know if he proactively changed the gimmick back...

    ReplyDelete
  64. Agreed. That was the time to pull the trigger, especially if you only have him for a year.

    ReplyDelete
  65. The HHH/Goldberg 1 on 1 match was originally set for Summerslam, it was even officially announced on Raw. Hunter got injured, and wasn't able to work a full match, so they made it a chamber match to add "smoke and mirrors" around Hunter's injury. I truly believe that the original plan was for the title change to happen at Summerslam, and I also believe that the chamber setting would have cheapened the win.



    I feel like the HHH/Goldberg 4 month feud was perfectly fine booking. And Goldberg was just as over the following month when he did win the title. Again, all in your heads. You're all just trying WAY too hard to make HHH the devil, he's not even 1/10 as bad as you all make him out to be.

    ReplyDelete
  66. Explain why it cheapens the win when he destroyed Jericho, murdered Orton, and then made HBK look like a jobber, probably the kayfabe worst loss he took since he was a tag-team schlub? He murders Trips in a 5-6 spot match and that's that. Bottom line, Rock, Jericho (twice), Orton and HBK can be disposed of by Goldberg, but Trips has to be booked to outsmart him.


    They only had a year, they fucked up, they should have called an audible. Screw "properly putting him over." Properly putting him over was jobbing like a bitch there.

    ReplyDelete
  67. "getting caught by a f'n sledgehammer by a desperate guy who is fully aware that he is outmatched" equals "Jobbing like a bitch" now?? *facepalm*



    The story was clear that Goldberg was the better man but Hunter barely escaped with the title due to an extreme fluke. So they had a 1 on 1 rematch at the next PPV, where goldberg won 100% clean and got a huge pop.


    Then Hunter, again aware that he has no chance against Goldberg put up a friggin $100k bounty on the guy.... Batista pillmanized his ankle... And Goldberg won 100% clean AGAIN at the Survivor Series, even with a busted ankle.


    Following Month, Hunter regains the title in a triple threat match, where Kane Chokeslammed Goldberg, Orton and Batista pulled kane out of the ring and restrained him, and HHH crawled and got a totally undeserved fluke pin after Kane did all the damage.


    Bottom like, if anyone looked like a bitch during this 4 month feud, it was HHH. But he never shows weakness right? He totally buried goldberg!! lol

    ReplyDelete
  68. The other newz was that Taker was supposed to do it a year earlier, but "conveniently" forgot to grow out his hair. You look at his feuds on Smackdown before they started the angle that led to the death of the Bikertaker, and it kind of holds up.


    Seems like the kind of thing that would drive Vince nuts. Rock and Austin were utter flops under their Vince gimmick, so when they do the "play yourself up to 11" gimmick and make money, that's not a big deal.
    But the Undertaker gimmick worked, so for him to ditch it for "Stone Cold who happens to have a motorcyle" and stay completely over had to piss him off a bit.

    ReplyDelete
  69. No, Triple H should have sucked it up and jobbed like a bitch, just like everyone else in that match, other than Nash, but he lost to Jericho so that's probably worse. Goldberg didn't job like a bitch, he got outsmarted.

    ReplyDelete
  70. "The money is in the chase" is unfounded. The company's most successful periods had babyface champions.

    ReplyDelete
  71. The guy he was arguing with was a joke character. That shouldn't have been an issue in 99, half the roster were joke characters. Jericho drinks the koolaid a bit too much. The one thing he's guilty of is maybe not studying up on the product and how the company worked, but playing his WCW character was not a mistake.

    ReplyDelete
  72. Sort of. Jericho's on-and-off feud with Hunter in 2000 was probably the best thing to happen to his career up until that point, and until his feud with The Rock the next year.

    Their 2002 feud, however, is a different story. Also, it didn't help that Jericho was made to look like a wimp against just about everybody at the time, and not just HHH. His two PPV wins over Austin, for example, are great examples of a wrestler doing the job for another wrestler multiple times without really giving them any sort of rub.

    ReplyDelete
  73. The HHH/Rocky feud was a VERY successful feud which featured Rocky spending a lot of time chasing the WWF title. I believe their Backlash match got the highest B-PPV buyrate ever up until that point.

    ReplyDelete
  74. You realize that Trips is the only guy who beat Goldberg (TV/PPV) in the WWE, right? At least in none 3 on 1 matches and such. That says alot. And he did it twice.

    ReplyDelete
  75. *starts rumours that Luger was the original choice for Kane*

    ReplyDelete
  76. I agree, but I keep reading this sentence all the time on this site. Yet whenever WWE does it, they are apparently burying the face when he needs more than 1 try to win the title. It's like they say it, but don't actually believe it.

    ReplyDelete
  77. I think sticking Jericho in the middle of the card with Chyna & Hardcore Holly slowed him down more. Granted, it would have been weird to put a Cruiserweight Title Guy over top-tier guys immediately. I forget if all the other top guys were busy- they COULD have theoretically given Jericho a huge push immediately (thereby pissing off the rest of the locker room).

    ReplyDelete
  78. Point is, he was able to get over doing something that was a clear departure from the Undertaker gimmick, name change or not. The loyalty card is a good point, but I think he would've been fine.

    ReplyDelete
  79. "I'm one of the biggestreddestmachineseverinthis.... GAH!"

    ReplyDelete
  80. It's not like it was an accident that Bikertaker was over. They did everything they could to keep him over. He had a Kid Rock entrance song, rode a motorcycle to the ring, and every heel was terrified of him. Almost anyone would have been over with that.

    ReplyDelete
  81. You're assuming WCW would have booked him as a biker, instead of calling him "Mark the Mortician" and then giving him off of TV once Vince started to sue them.

    ReplyDelete
  82. I thought Jericho got enough of the Rock in that segment that he could be perceived as not too far out of Rock's league. I was surprised and saddened to see him busted down to feuds with Road Dogg, Ken Shamrock (who I liked, but was winding up in WWF at that point), and X-Pac, but I guess they had to let him get his sea legs in the WWF.

    ReplyDelete
  83. I thought Spivey's back was busted up in 95 when he was playing Waylon Mercy and he couldn't wrestle anymore?

    ReplyDelete
  84. If HHH was too. injured to do the match, he was too injured to be champ. If you were worried about the chamber cheapening Goldberg's moment, then drop it to one of the other people in the match and have Goldberg get the one on one victory over him later.

    ReplyDelete
  85. At the time I thought that pairing him with Hunter was a legit move to elevate him, and I even bought (and still do in the right circumstances) that a hard fought loss to a higher level guy can be an elevation.
    In this case, it was not.

    ReplyDelete
  86. They NEVER tested the "Kane" character at a live event. He was working Memphis and the Greenwich Trax facility to work out the kinks but he was never the "Kane" character live. Meltzer reported that they were going with a mask and full body suit at the time but that was because someone saw the costume designs. I went back a few years ago to my old Newsletters (Torch and Observer) and the reader pages were just BURYING the Kane debut. They thought it was a such a goofy costume (ala Giant Gonzalez failure), that "Fake Diesel" will never draw and he even "botched the tombstone" at the end. Some were even saying 'Yeah Vince, that's a good nWo counter--Glen Jacobs playing Michael Myers." haha, it's amazing. I loved the original Kane character up to 2000. Jacobs was really great with somehow showing emotion by moving his head and neck.

    ReplyDelete
  87. What looks better:


    Goldberg plowing through the entire Elimination Chamber, eliminating such stars as Jericho, Orton, and Shawn on the way to beating Tripe? Or Goldberg getting hit in the ass with a sledgehammer, being pinned, and looking like a choke artist?


    Mind you, Triple H was injured to the point where he was only able to perform one move.

    ReplyDelete
  88. Whether or not it was intentional, I think Jericho was definitely elevated in his 2000 feud with HHH. His Last Man Standing loss to Hunter at Fully Loaded 2000 is a near-perfect example of what you describe, with Jericho being made to look very strong in defeat.

    ReplyDelete
  89. Absolutely. 'Taker in his first babyface run as Bikertaker was one of the most cringeworthy, attemptedly cool characters I've ever seen.

    ReplyDelete
  90. I remember hearing that they were considering WCW's Ron Studd for Kane, but I feel like that might just be something my friends and I started saying (due to the fact that the dude was 7+ feet) and then took as a fact.

    ReplyDelete
  91. I'm not an Observer subscriber, so it's difficult for me to find 16 year old news ... This link is not what I'd call a "source" exactly, but enough to show I'm not completely delusional that there was talk.

    http://www.oowrestling.com/columns/timeline/20020215.shtml

    ReplyDelete
  92. Oh jeez, yeah the all-white thing. I think it was also rumoured he was going to be renamed "The Saviour".

    ReplyDelete
  93. And he's right. He needs that gimmick and all the protection that came with it. Otherwise he's just a guy

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment